Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x Copilot+ PC Review – Snapdragon X ARM With OLED Display

I recently had the opportunity to test out the new Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x, an ARM-based Windows laptop featuring the Snapdragon X Elite processor. You can check it out in my latest review.

The Yoga Slim 7x is priced at around $1,200 (compensated affiliate link). My review loaner came equipped with 16GB of LPDDR5x RAM and a 512GB NVME SSD. There’s also a ThinkPad variant available at a slightly higher cost, offering similar performance.

The core distinction between this laptop and its Intel or AMD counterparts lies in its ARM architecture. While Windows has supported ARM processors for years, it often came at the expense of performance and compatibility. However, the latest Snapdragon chips have significantly closed this performance gap, delivering a much-improved experience, albeit with lingering compatibility issues. Not all software runs seamlessly, and the success of running different applications can be unpredictable.

One of the major advantages of this ARM-based machine is its battery life. The Slim 7x houses a 70-watt-hour battery, comparable to those found in Apple’s MacBook Pros. In my tests, it performed admirably, offering battery life on par with ARM-based MacBooks, making it a solid choice for users prioritizing battery life.

One of its standout features is the 14.5-inch OLED display with a 3K resolution (2944×1840). This screen supports Dolby Vision and boasts a peak brightness of 1,000 nits, with a typical brightness of 500 nits. The display also supports a 90Hz refresh rate which would be great for gaming if the compatibility with games wasn’t so bad. But in day-to-day use the 90hz display does make the computer feel faster and more responsive.

The laptop’s build quality is impressive, featuring an all-aluminum design that weighs in at 2.82 pounds (1.28 kg). The keyboard is well-designed, with good key travel and backlighting, making typing a comfortable experience. The large trackpad is responsive, although I preferred turning off the tap-to-click function for better accuracy.

In terms of connectivity, the Yoga Slim 7x has three USB 4.0 ports, all capable of 40Gbps data transfer and supporting display output and power delivery. Unlike the HP Omnibook X laptop I reviewed earlier, this Lenovo device handled a Thunderbolt-connected external hard drive reliably, although the performance was slightly below typical Thunderbolt speeds.

For those considering external GPUs, the current state of ARM drivers does not support this functionality, although future updates and driver compatibility may change this. The 1080p webcam is adequate for video calls, though not exceptional, and the speakers are sufficient for conference calls and casual media consumption.

The laptop’s performance in web browsing and Microsoft Office applications is excellent. The ARM optimized Brave web browser, for instance, ran smoothly, and media playback was flawless, including 60fps YouTube videos. The device also supports Wi-Fi 7, ensuring compatibility with the latest wireless standards.

For more demanding tasks like video editing, the ARM optimized version of DaVinci Resolve performs well, handling a simple 4K 60fps project without issue with similar performance to Intel and AMD based machines. However, this level of use does reduce battery life more significantly.

Gaming on ARM-based laptops remains problematic due to compatibility issues. Titles like No Man’s Sky, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Doom Eternal either failed to run or encountered significant glitches when they did load up.

While Linux is not yet compatible with the Snapdragon X Elite processors, Qualcomm has promised future support.

The Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x shows considerable promise, but its ARM architecture still faces significant compatibility hurdles. It’s suitable for users primarily working with Office 365 and web-based applications, providing excellent performance and battery life. However, those requiring a broader range of software compatibility may still find Intel or AMD-based laptops to be a safer bet as compatibility is just not guaranteed.

Copilot+ AI Features Are Meh…

The new ARM-based CoPilot+ PCs (compensated affilate link) have generated a lot of buzz, but the reality of their exclusive AI features is far less impressive that marketed. HP loaned me their Omnibook X 14 for my recent review and I put Microsoft’s heavily marketed AI features to the test. The verdict? Meh.. See more in this video.

Starting with the Paint application, the “Co-create” feature allows users to enhance their drawings with AI with images generated on-device using the new Snapdragon Elite X processor. The feature will generate artwork in a number of different styles based on the user’s original drawing but it also requires a text prompt.

Because the image generation happens on device, the Snapdragon isn’t capable of generating the types of beautiful images found on cloud-based solutions like OpenAI’s Dall-E. Still the images generate quickly and without the complex UI of some of the open source on-device solutions I’ve played with. In short, it’s a gee-whiz feature that sorta works but is not very useful.

My big gripe is that although this AI does its work on-device, it still requires an Internet connection to execute. The reason? Microsoft’s servers review each request to make sure users aren’t doing something the company finds inappropriate.

In the Photos app, the AI enhancement feature can add fun background elements to portraits but struggles with more complex tasks. Like the Cocreate feature, it will require a prompt (and server approval) but will do its work on an existing photo. But the results are lackluster at best. Images without people get mangled up pretty decently. When people are present the AI will only add background effects as safety policies will not allow the user to do any manipulation of images with human faces.

Live Captions, another CoPilot+ feature, offers real-time translation of video and audio content. This feature stands out as genuinely useful, accurately translating spoken language during video playback and calls. However, it only translates into English and does not support two-way translation just yet.

Copilot+ adds a few more webcam Studio Effects like eye contact adjustment, making it appear as though the user is looking at the camera even when they’re not. This subtle feature, along with improved background blur and creative filters, enhances video call experiences but remains a minor improvement of a feature already found in recent Intel and AMD based devices.

Notably absent from these devices is what was supposed to be the flagship AI feature called Recall. This feature takes screenshots of the user’s activity along with associated documents and applications open at the time and allows the user to search through their history using plain language prompts. If, for example, a user was planning a trip and lost track of a website they had visited a simple text query could pull it out of the usage history.

Recall is a great task for the limited capacity of the on-board NPU but it raised a number of privacy and security concerns that forced Microsoft to pause the feature’s release. Without Recall the AI functionality Microsoft built their Copilot+ PC marketing campaign around falls way short in this reviewer’s opinion.

Overall, while the AI features on CoPilot+ PCs are interesting, they are not compelling enough to justify choosing these devices over traditional Intel or AMD-based machines. The promise of superior battery life and performance improvements will be the real test for these ARM machines. You can check out my review of the HP Omnibook X here to see how well it does in those key areas.

HP Omnibook X 14 Review – ARM Based CoPilot+ Windows PC

I recently had the chance to test out the new HP Omnibook X14, one of the first set of PCs marketed under Microsoft’s Copilot+ line. This model is powered by the Snapdragon X Elite processor, an ARM-based chip similar to those found in smartphones and MacBooks. Historically, Windows on ARM has struggled with performance and compatibility issues, but this new chip aims to bridge that gap.

You can see it in action in my latest review!

The Omnibook X14 is priced at around $1,149 (compensated affiliate link), placing it in the mid-range of the laptop market. It boasts several AI features, although these seem underwhelming and not a significant reason to choose this model over Intel or AMD alternatives. I demoed those features in my previous video. My focus for this review is on its performance as a standard laptop.

In terms of hardware, it comes with 16 GB of LPDDR5x RAM and a 512 GB NVMe solid-state drive. The 14-inch display runs at a 2.2k resolution and is a touch panel, although it doesn’t support full 360-degree rotation. The build quality is solid, with an aluminum body and a weight just under 3 pounds. However, the keyboard tends to lift with the display, a minor inconvenience not seen in more premium laptops.

The Omnibook features a decent 1440p webcam with a manual shutter, suitable for video calls. The speakers are adequate for conference calls but not impressive for music. The keyboard is comfortable, with good key spacing and travel, and the trackpad works well once tap-to-click is disabled. It supports facial recognition for quick logins but lacks a fingerprint reader. In terms of ports, it includes a 10 gigabit USB-C port and a faster 40 gigabit USB 4.0 port, although compatibility with Thunderbolt devices is hit-or-miss in my testing on the USB 4.

Performance-wise, the Omnibook X14 handles productivity tasks well. Running Microsoft Word and browsing with the Brave browser was smooth and responsive, comparable to mid-range Intel or AMD laptops that cost about the same. This is a major improvement over prior ARM windows PCs I’ve tested where performance was well below comparably priced PCs.

Battery life is the standout feature here, with reports suggesting up to 24 hours on a single charge. In my experience, it easily handled a full day of work without needing a recharge, aligning it with the longevity seen in MacBook Air models. I have yet to hit a batter warning even with leaving it unplugged throughout the day.

For more demanding tasks, such as video editing, the laptop performed admirably with DaVinci Resolve when using the ARM-optimized version of the software. This marks a significant improvement over previous ARM-based machines, although the availability of optimized applications like this one remains a limiting factor.

Windows is doing a much better job of emulating Intel & AMD x86/x64 code on ARM processors – applications run without much fuss provided they’re relatively simple applications. But as before gaming remains a weak point. Popular titles like No Man’s Sky and Red Dead Redemption 2 failed to run properly due to compatibility issues. Doom Eternal did boot up but experienced significant glitches and inconsistent performance. All three games run at surprisingly good framerates on similarly priced Intel and AMD hardware.

Benchmark tests, such as 3DMark Wildlife, suggest there is potential for great performance once games are optimized for the chipset. But, like the video editing example above, developers have to make some effort to port their games over to the new platform to realize the performance potential. The Windows emulation layer simply doesn’t cut it.

I also attempted to run Linux on the Omnibook but was unsuccessful. The ARM version of Ubuntu did not fully boot, though it reached the GRUB screen. The Omnibook does run with a standard UEFI bios so it should be possible to get Linux up and running in the very near future.

The HP Omnibook X and the other Snapdragon Elite X PCs released this week represent a step forward for Windows running on ARM processors. Previous iterations sacrificed both performance and compatibility for battery life, but these new machines only struggle with compatibility.

For now, if your needs are basic productivity applications and super long battery life, the Omnibook X is a solid choice. However, if gaming or specialized software is a priority, you’ll want to stick with more traditional hardware unless there’s a specific ARM port of the application. By comparison, Intel and AMD battery life is much better than it was a few years ago (although not as good as the new Copilot+ line), and the latest iteration of x64 processors also have NPU hardware acceleration for AI applications.

Robo & Kala Windows Tablet Review

My latest review is of a new Windows ARM device, the Robo & Kala tablet/laptop. This product is the only one this new company is currently manufacturing.

While they call it a laptop, it’s essentially a detachable tablet with an OLED display. The tablet boasts some intriguing features, but I couldn’t help but feel that the Windows ARM experience still has some way to go.

The tablet is priced at $799, which includes the keyboard and trackpad component. One of the standout features is its 12.6-inch OLED display with a resolution of 2560 by 1600. The display is vibrant and offers a brightness of 600 nits. But it doesn’t support HDR video.

Under the hood, the tablet is powered by a Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 processor, paired with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of solid-state storage. Weighing in at 2.34 pounds with the keyboard attached, it’s relatively lightweight and portable. However, I did notice an issue when using it as a tablet. Often, my hand resting on the tablet would result in inadvertent inputs due to its very thin bezels, which was a bit frustrating.

In terms of build quality, the tablet feels premium with its all-metal design. The kickstand at the back is reminiscent of the Surface devices, allowing for adjustable viewing angles. A unique feature is that the detachable keyboard switches to a Bluetooth keyboard/trackpad when detached, allowing for continued use.

The keyboard itself feels pretty nice. The keys are large, well-spaced, and offer a good amount of travel. The trackpad is responsive and offers a firm click. For security, there’s no fingerprint reader, but an infrared camera facilitates facial recognition for logging in.

When it comes to ports, the tablet is equipped with two USB Type-C ports. However, there’s no headphone jack, so you’ll need to rely on Bluetooth headphones or a USB dongle. The speakers, unfortunately, left much to be desired. They sounded tinny and lacked depth. The tablet’s webcam offers decent quality with a 5-megapixel camera on the front and a 13-megapixel camera on the back.

In terms of performance, basic tasks like web browsing felt smooth, especially on an ARM-optimized browser like Edge. Video playback on platforms like YouTube was also satisfactory.

Like most ARM devices battery life here is excellent. This tablet can easily hit the 10-12 hour mark for basic tasks and video watching if display brightness is kept low. The OLED does consume more power than LED displays so other 8cx Gen 3 laptops may do a little better.

When it came to gaming, the experience was mixed. Older games like Half-Life 2 ran smoothly, but more demanding titles like GTA 5 struggled to maintain consistent frame rates. This is a reminder that while the ARM architecture offers benefits like improved battery life, it still lags behind Intel and AMD in terms of raw performance at this price point.

In conclusion, the Robo & Kala tablet is a well-constructed device with a beautiful display. It’s ideal for basic tasks and offers impressive battery life. However, the ARM architecture still has compatibility limitations, especially when it comes to more demanding applications and gaming. If you’re looking for a device primarily for office applications and light tasks, this could be a good fit. But for more intensive tasks, you might want to consider other options.