This Retail GPU Works Great for Local AI !

I recently began exploring the practical applications of local AI by integrating a new GPU into my hardware configuration. I purchased an Asus card equipped with 16 gigabytes of video memory (compensated affiliate link) that by today’s standards is at a fairly “budget” price.

Check out what it can do in my latest video!

16 gigabytes is enough RAM to house the Gemma 4 26-billion parameter mixture of experts model. This specific model provides a balance of performance and efficiency that mirrors what many users expect from cloud-based subscriptions, but without the need for external data processing and costs.

My current setup involves an external GPU configuration using an Oculink Thunderbolt dock connected to a GMKTec mini PC. While the computer itself contains 64 gigabytes of system RAM, running these models exclusively on a GPU is necessary for maintaining acceptable speeds. For the software interface, I am using LM Studio, a free cross-platform application that allows for fine-tuning performance settings. One useful feature of this software is the ability to offload portions of a model to system memory if the GPU’s capacity is exceeded, though this results in a significant reduction in processing speed.

During initial testing, the Gemma model generated text at a rate of approximately 45 tokens per second generating a short fiction story. While the system consumes about 200 watts of power under a full load, it idles at 36 watts. Beyond simple text generation, the setup is capable of visual analysis. In one test, I provided the model with a photograph of some friends and I in front of Space Shuttle Atlantis. It accurately identified the shuttle and the attributes of the individuals in the frame, correctly processing the visual data without external assistance.

I also tested the model’s ability to handle complex document analysis. I combined a 24-page FCC proposal regarding prepaid smartphones with a transcript of a video I had previously recorded on the topic. Because LM Studio does not currently support PDF files, I converted the information into a single text document. After increasing the context length to its maximum setting to ensure the AI could “see” the entire file, I asked it to draft testimony for the FCC based on my specific concerns raised in the video and attributing those concerns to a specific portion of the FCC’s draft proposal. The model successfully identified my points regarding the privacy of whistleblowers and reporters and was mostly correct in its attributions.

The model demonstrated further utility in coding tasks. It managed to write a functional browser-based Space Invaders clone in a single attempt, including basic game logic and sound effects. Later, I used it to generate a Python script designed to scrape education statutes from a state website. When the first version of the script returned an error, the AI analyzed the problem and provided a corrected version that successfully consolidated numerous legal chapters into one searchable document.

For datasets too large for a standard chat interface, I utilized an application called Anything LLM to perform retrieval augmented generation, or RAG. This process involves indexing and embedding documents locally so the AI can query them efficiently. I uploaded five megabytes of state statutes and asked the model to calculate a specific school grant amount based on a complex formula. The model performed the necessary math and returned the correct figure of $2.2 million. I found that while the local model sometimes requires more specific prompting than cloud-based alternatives like Google’s Notebook LM, it is capable of providing high-fidelity results.

Running larger models, such as those with 31 billion parameters, reduces performance to about five tokens per second when the GPU memory is exceeded. However, the flexibility to swap between various models from Google, Qwen, or other developers allows for a customized approach to different tasks. These tools have reached a point where they are functional for data analysis and automated workflows while keeping all information on a local server. For anyone with a modern video card and a sufficient amount of VRAM, these local models offer a viable way to experiment with AI without relying on the cloud.

Fox to Acquire Roku in a $22 Billion Deal.. What’s Next?

The landscape of streaming TV shifted Monday with the announcement that Fox Broadcasting is set to acquire Roku. What will the implications of this $22 billion deal be for the average television viewer?

In my latest video, I dive into the details the two companies released during an investor call.

Roku’s current position in the market is a primary driver for this acquisition. The company currently accounts for 44% of total hours spent viewing connected TV content by brand in the United States. This dominance is not just limited to their standalone streaming sticks but extends to the numerous television sets that use the Roku operating system.

Over the last year, Roku reported approximately $5 billion in revenue, with advertising accounting for half of that figure. The business has transitioned away from hardware, which now represents only about 11% of their revenue, toward a model built on ad sales, data collection for targeted marketing, and a share of subscription fees from third-party services like Netflix.

For Fox, the acquisition provides a path to the top tier of the streaming market. By combining its existing viewership with the Roku Channel, Fox moves into a competitive position alongside industry leaders, trailing only YouTube in terms of market share and gaining ground on Netflix and Paramount. The company expects significant growth in both connected TV advertising and streaming subscriptions through this integrated platform.

Based on the details provided in the investor call, users should expect noticeable changes to the Roku interface. One of the key shifts involves the promotion of Fox-owned content and properties. The current “top picks” and algorithmic recommendations will likely favor Fox programming over other partners. The sports section is also expected to feature a heavier concentration of Fox Sports content. There is a possibility that the traditional grid of apps, which many users prefer for its simplicity, may be moved further down the screen to make room for these promoted recommendations and additional advertising spaces.

While Fox representatives stated they intend to maintain a level of “neutrality” toward other providers like Disney—partly because Roku earns revenue from selling those subscriptions—the emphasis on organic-looking Fox recommendations suggests a more curated experience. The core functionality of the devices is expected to remain intact, as the value of Roku has always depended on its ability to host a wide variety of streaming services. However, the path a user takes to find their preferred apps is likely to require navigating around Fox’s priorities.

The acquisition is structured as a mix of 60% cash and 40% stock, valuing Roku at $160 per share. Once the deal is finalized, Fox shareholders will own 73% of the combined entity, while Roku shareholders will hold the remaining 27%. Anthony Wood, the founder of Roku who previously established ReplayTV, is slated to remain on the board.

The deal still requires approval from shareholders and government regulators. with the companies anticipating the deal closing sometime in 2027. Watching how the interface evolves as we approach the closing date will provide the best indication of what the future of this hardware will look like in a Fox-owned ecosystem.

Let’s Talk About Windows 11’s Bloated Notepad and a Fix!

A few weeks ago, I published a video about Microsoft’s recognition about how bloated Windows has become. You don’t have to look much further than the current status of the Notepad app to see that bloat in action.

In my latest video, we take a look at Notepad.exe’s feature creep and how you can download a free alternative that brings the simple version we have all come to know and love back.

Upon opening Notepad now, the software automatically loads every document previously accessed, syncing them across a Microsoft account and putting each one in its own tab. It includes formatting options, a tabbed interface, and even integrated AI tools like Copilot.

This shift moves away from the utility’s original purpose. When I first used Notepad on Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s, it was a straightforward tool for taking quick notes. It handled one document at a time, requiring the user to close one file before opening another. This simplicity remained largely unchanged through several iterations of the operating system, from the original Windows 1.0 through Windows 10. The utility functioned effectively for decades because it remained focused on basic text entry without additional overhead.

The technical demands of the current version are also notable. In my recent observations, running four small text files in the updated Notepad consumed roughly 87 megabytes of RAM. This footprint appeared to grow the longer the application remained open, adding 10 megabytes during my testing period without opening any additional files, which may suggest background telemetry or memory management issues. To put this in perspective, the entire computer system I used in 1992 operated on only 4 megabytes of total memory. While some users might find the added features beneficial, the increased resource consumption seems high for a simple text editor – especially as Microsoft’s more robust text editor, WordPad, has been removed with its features now added to Notepad.

For those seeking a return to a more minimalist experience, an alternative has emerged from the open-source community. Dave Plummer, a retired Microsoft software engineer, has developed an application called RetroPad. It is designed to function like the classic version of the software, prioritizing speed and a minimal footprint. In a direct comparison, RetroPad used approximately 1.7 megabytes of memory to handle the same text that required nearly 88 megabytes in the official Microsoft version.

The application is currently available via GitHub, where the executable can be downloaded from the project’s binaries folder. Plummer is also developing a version in assembly language to further reduce the executable size, but I noticed its memory footprint was significantly larger than the other version.

For users who find the modern updates to be an unnecessary complication, this project offers a functional way to return to a simpler workflow.

Is the FCC Coming for Burner Phones & Prepaid Accounts?

I have been following reports regarding the Federal Communications Commission’s stance on the future of prepaid mobile devices and sim cards, often referred to as “burner phones.” While some headlines suggest a total ban is imminent, the reality is the FCC is currently weighing requiring that individuals identify themselves with a government ID when purchasing these devices and plans.

In my latest video, I take a look at what the FCC is considering and what the implications might be.

The core of this issue lies in the persistence of illegal call traffic. Many of us are familiar with the daily influx of fraudulent text messages and automated calls, ranging from “pig butchering” investment schemes to fake government notifications. To facilitate these operations, bad actors frequently utilize “SIM farms”—setups where hundreds of SIM cards are loaded into machines to send out bulk messages efficiently. Currently, it is relatively easy to walk into a convenience store, pay cash for a prepaid SIM card, and gain access to the cellular network with total anonymity.

Under a new proposal, the FCC is looking to tighten the requirements for these purchases. The proposed rules would require providers to obtain a customer’s name, physical address, and a government-issued ID number, along with an alternate phone number, before activating service. This would apply to both new and renewing prepaid customers. Furthermore, the commission is considering disqualifying the use of P.O. boxes, mail forwarding services, and shared office locations as valid addresses, arguing that these do not sufficiently verify a user’s identity.

There are, however, significant privacy implications to consider. Certain groups rely on the ability to remain anonymous for their safety and professional integrity. This includes whistleblowers, domestic violence survivors who need to keep their location hidden from abusers, and journalists working on sensitive assignments. By requiring a government ID and a physical home address for every prepaid phone, the barrier to maintaining that privacy becomes much higher.

Groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation have expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of such a move. The argument is that criminals will likely not be deterred by these requirements; instead, they may simply use stolen identities from the numerous databases already available on the dark web to bypass the system. This creates a risk where the policy could inadvertently incentivize more identity theft while doing little to stop the actual robocalls.

I find the focus on the end-user somewhat misplaced. Mobile carriers have the technical capacity to identify when hundreds of SIM cards are operating from a single location and connecting to the same cell tower to blast out thousands of messages. Concentrating on carrier accountability and the detection of SIM farms might address the root of the problem more effectively than collecting the personal data of every individual user.

Within the commission, there is a visible divide on how to proceed. While the two Republican commissioners (Chairman Brendan Carr and Commissioner Olivia Trusty) have labeled this a top priority for consumer protection, Democrat Anna Gomez has raised concerns regarding the privacy of those who use prepaid services legitimately. Gomez feels the onus should be on the carriers to detect fraudulent traffic.

As this proposal moves through the rule-making process, the commission is seeking public comment on dockets 17-59 and 02-278. In the video I demonstrate how you can submit public comment on this docket.

So while this is not the end of burner phone, the era of anonymous entry into telecommunications network may be nearing an end. I will continue to monitor the docket as this proceeding makes it through the process.

See more analysis pieces like this here!

Local AI is Finally Usable! Real-World Workflows on a 5-Year-Old Mac with Google Gemma

For the past few years, I have been downloading local AI models to determine if they could handle practical automation tasks or summarize long-form content. Historically, these experiments have been unsuccessful, with the models typically failing to provide comprehensive results or losing track of the original context. However, recent developments in model optimization, specifically on Apple hardware, have changed the baseline for what is possible on a personal computer.

In my latest video, I demo running Google’s latest Gemma 4 model, a 26-billion parameter “mixture of experts” model optimized for the Mac using the MLX framework on my 2021 Macbook Pro with an M1 Max and 32GB of RAM.

Check it out here!

I observed the model generating approximately 50 tokens per second. While this is slower than a high-end cloud-based system, it represents a very usuable generation speed for a local setup. The unified memory architecture of the Mac allows the GPU to access data efficiently, which is why these older machines remain relevant for AI tasks that would otherwise require significant cloud computing resources.

During my testing, I provided the model with a transcript from a recent video to see if it could produce a coherent summary. Unlike previous local models that often provided incomplete or erratic responses, this model maintained a consistent narrative and adhered strictly to the provided text. I also tested it with a dense legal document from an FCC docket. After processing a large amount of extracted text, the model was able to delineate the key arguments of the filing and, upon further prompting, condensed the information into a concise executive summary.

I also examined the model’s vision capabilities using a tool called MLX studio, which supports image analysis. I uploaded a photograph with some friends and I in front of a space shuttle and asked the model to describe the scene. While it misidentified the vehicle as a Dreamchaser—a different type of spacecraft—the level of detail was a step forward from earlier local models that often provided much less accurate descriptions. This functionality is particularly useful for my ongoing project to index a large archive of digital photos dating back to 1997. Using a local model for this type of organization could potentially eliminate the costs and privacy issues associated with the thousands of API calls required for cloud-based indexing.

To test the model’s utility in a production environment, I integrated it into my N8N automation server. I currently use a cloud-based AI with my N8N server to scan news feeds and identify relevant stories for my daily work. I ran a portion of this same workflow using the local Gemma model to see if it could replicate the results. It took approximately three minutes to process the news briefing. Although the results were not quite as polished as those from the cloud, the model successfully identified unique stories and avoided duplicated stories about Apple’s WWDC event that were being published at the time.

Google appears to be prioritizing the development of effective local models more than some of its competitors, providing a way for users to utilize AI without incurring expenses beyond the electricity required to run their own hardware. Seeing a 26-billion parameter model function with this level of stability on a five-year-old laptop has caused me to rethink my existing workflows. I am now looking at which of my daily tasks can be moved away from the cloud and managed entirely on my own hardware.

See more videos like this here!

ATSC 3.0 Update: DRM Breaks TV Emergency Messaging!

Last week, Weigel Broadcasting met with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to present the findings of a study they conducted regarding encrypted TV signals and Emergency Alert System (EAS) messages . They found that the EAS messages were encrypted along with the content, limiting who can actually see it.

In my latest video I detail Weigel’s findings.

For the past two decades, the ATSC 1.0 standard has allowed nearly any television to receive TV broadcasts with a simple antenna. These devices do not require firmware updates or internet connectivity to decode signals; they operate on a settled standard that works immediately upon being plugged in. In contrast, many ATSC 3.0 televisions and tuning boxes require digital certificates to decrypt content. In some cases, these certificates require an internet connection to refresh, creating a potential point of failure during a crisis – especially if the user doesn’t regularly use the over the air tuner on their television.

Weigel’s presentation to the FCC highlighted a documented disconnect between industry claims and technical reality. While some industry groups have previously stated that content protection does not impede the delivery of emergency alerts, Weigel’s testing in Chicago, Charlotte, Green Bay, and South Bend suggested a different outcome. Using both certified and uncertified tuning devices, researchers found that if a device was unable to decrypt the primary television signal, it failed to display the Emergency Alert System (EAS) messages. The emergency information was essentially trapped inside the encrypted signal.

This creates a significant reliability issue. During severe weather events or other catastrophes, internet and cellular infrastructure are often the first services to fail due to damaged fiber optic lines or power outages. If a television requires a handshake with a remote server to decode a local broadcast, the very system designed for emergency redundancy becomes dependent on the infrastructure most likely to be compromised. I observed a practical example of this earlier this year when a certified tuning box failed to decode encrypted channels during a blizzard due to a security certificate error, even though it was marketed as not requiring an internet connection.

The financial and technical barriers to entry are also notable. Currently, ATSC 3.0 tuners are primarily found in high-end television models, leaving low- and mid-range consumers without native access. The third-party boxes that can bridge this gap are subject to a certification process controlled by the nation’s largest broadcasters. This allows those broadcasters to determine which devices are permitted to decrypt the public airwaves, a shift from the open-standard approach that’s been around for decades.

Weigel’s recommendations to the FCC seek to establish several safeguards as this transition continues. They are advocating for the continued requirement of ATSC 1.0 simulcasting for the foreseeable future to ensure the public is not abruptly cut off. Furthermore, they suggested that a minimum of 19.3 megabits per second of bandwidth be dedicated specifically to free over-the-air video to prevent spectrum from being diverted to private data services. Their proposal also concedes that while digital rights management may exist, it should never require an internet connection for decryption, and signal reception thresholds should remain consistent so consumers are not forced to replace existing antennas.

The FCC is now faced with a choice regarding how to balance the revenue desires of broadcasters with the safety requirements of the general public. The data provided by this study offers a specific look at the risks of prioritizing revenue over accessibility. What’s next? Stay tuned!

See more in my ATSC 3.0 series here.

SuperStation One With Dock MiSTer Review : Lots of Analog TV Options!

After months of waiting, I finally got my Superstation One, a new “consoleized” MiSTer device developed by hardware maker Taki Udon. For those who follow the MiSTer open-source project, the Superstation One represents a shift toward a more consumer-friendly form factor that does not require stacking a bunch of circuit boards together.

See it in action in my latest MiSTer review!

For those not familiar, a MiSTer runs classic computers and video games (both console and arcade) using FPGA technology. The FPGA chip replicates the logic of the original chips found on these devices which makes it incredibly accurate to the original. While the Superstation One looks a lot like the original Playstation, complete with controller and memory card slots, it is compatible with the full MiSTer library of old computers and gaming platforms.

The Playstation ports utilize an integrated “SNAC” interface to connect the peripherals directly to the PS1’s FPGA core, which reduces input latency compared to standard USB. While the base unit is limited to PlayStation controllers, adding the dock provides a universal SNAC port for other adapters, such as those for NES Zapper light guns as I demoed in the video.

The base console retails for $210, and I paired mine with the $45 docking station. The dock includes an optical drive intended to eventually boot physical media for systems like the Sega CD and TurboGrafx-16. However, at this stage of development, the CD drive is not functional within the software. The dock does provide other useful features, such as an NVME slot for high-capacity SSD storage, several additional USB ports, USB interfaces for development and a “SNAC” port for attaching original controllers and light guns.

The variety of video outputs sets this apart from other MiSTer clones I have used. It includes a standard HDMI output found on most modern devices, but it also integrates a wide range of analog video options: VGA (including the option to break VGA out to component RGB), a Sega Saturn-style DIN connector (for special DIN RGB cables), a dedicated component video output, S-video, and composite RCA. This is currently the only MiSTer that incorporates all of these video options directly on the hardware.

In my testing, I was able to run an RCA composite signal to a 40-year-old Hitachi television while simultaneously outputting an HDMI signal to a modern monitor. This allows for playing on a period-accurate zero latency CRT display while capturing high-definition footage for a stream or recording. The video signals were clean, and the composite and S-video options worked without requiring additional configuration (for most cores) or external dongles.

I tested several demanding cores, including the PlayStation, Saturn, Neo Geo, and Sega 32X. Everything performed the same as other MiSTer hardware I have tested.

The software environment, however, feels unpolished. Because this hardware is offering video output features beyond what is typically found on a stock MiSTer, I encountered some cores that required specific dip-switch adjustments to output color correctly over certain analog connections. Taki Udon is developing a custom, console-style menu system that is currently in a beta state that is just barely usable. Eventually that interface will be able to access the optical drive but for now it’s mostly a proof of concept.

The build quality is generally solid, though there are minor points of concern. The plastic doors on the unit can detach easily, and the system runs noticeably warm during operation. While my unit remained stable during extended memory tests without a cooling fan, the developer now offers an active cooling solution for those concerned about heat.

But all in, this hardware offers a more accessible entry point for users who want a turnkey solution rather than a DIY assembly. It consolidates features that usually require multiple add-on boards into a single footprint. As Taki now focuses in on the software aspects fo the device and the optical drive becomes functional, the utility of the Superstation One will expand.

California Backing Off on Linux Age Verification ?

I recently followed up on the developments regarding California’s age verification law, which originally sought to require all operating system providers—including those in the open-source community—to collect the birth dates or ages of their users. A new amendment is currently moving through the California legislature that attempts to address some of the concerns raised by the initial language, specifically by creating a carveout for open-source providers.

We take a look at that in my latest video.

The proposed amendment adds a section to exempt any person or entity that distributes an operating system or application under license terms allowing a recipient to copy, redistribute, and modify the software. Under this definition, open-source projects would likely be exempt from the data collection requirements. However, the scope of this exemption raises questions about major platforms like Android. While Google layers closed-source services onto its devices, the underlying operating system is redistributable and modifiable, which could potentially place it within this new exemption.

Despite the move to protect open-source software, other parts of the amendment introduce new privacy considerations. The updated language specifies that operating systems must share a user’s age information with several third parties, including application stores, developers, browser providers, and internet website operators. Because website operators in California may be held accountable for the age of their users, they are likely to request this data as a matter of course to ensure they are in compliance with the law.

The amendment also places the onus on developers and website operators to act on their own data should it conflict with the age information sent by the operating system. This suggests that the data provided by the operating system may not be treated as a definitive source, which could encourage websites to collect even more personal information independently to avoid legal trouble. Furthermore, the law does not currently appear to restrict these developers or website operators from sharing that age data with other third parties.

This legislative activity passed the California State Assembly last week by a vote of 68 to 1 and is now heading to the State Senate. It is expected to be signed by the governor before the original law takes effect this fall. This is part of a broader national trend, as seen in Texas where the state is currently taking legal action against platforms like Discord to enforce mandatory age verification.

As state governments continue to move forward with these requirements, the impact on individual privacy remains a primary point of discussion. While these laws aim to regulate access, they may also lead to a shift in how people use the internet. I will be watching to see if these measures result in a rise of decentralized, open-source applications that replicate the functionality of major social platforms while operating outside the reach of centralized data collection mandates.

Big Changes Coming to Android Sideloading

I have long valued the Android operating system for its openness, particularly the ability to sideload applications outside of the Google Play store. Whether I am installing a PlayStation 2 emulator on a budget tablet or adding specialized benchmarking tools to a Google TV device, the process of downloading an APK file and bypasssing the official storefront has been a hallmark of the platform.

But this flexibility is set to put under significant restrictions as Google prepares to implement a new policy regarding how apps are distributed and installed outside the Play Store.

See more in my latest analysis video!

Under the new rules, developers who wish to offer apps for sideloading will be required to verify their identity with Google, providing legal names, addresses, and official government identification. For organizations, this includes providing a Dun’s number and a verified website. Even if an app is hosted on a private website rather than the Play Store, it must be registered with Google and signed with a private key. While there is a limited distribution tier for small-scale projects involving fewer than 20 devices, broader distribution will require a registration fee, currently set at approximately $25.

For the average user, the process of installing an app that hasn’t been registered through this process is becoming notably more complex. When attempting to sideload an unsigned application, a user must first confirm they are not being coached by a third party to disable security settings. This is followed by a mandatory device reboot and full reauthentication of their Google account to terminate any potential remote access or active calls. Most notably, a 24-hour waiting period is then triggered. Only after this day-long delay can the user return, verify their identity via biometrics or a PIN, and finally complete the installation.

These protections can be enabled temporarily for seven days or indefinitely on a per-device basis. Google maintains that these steps are necessary to combat rising instances of malware and social engineering, citing examples like banking fraud and malicious software disguised as wedding invitations. By adding these layers of friction, the company aims to protect vulnerable users who might be pressured by scammers into installing dangerous software. Yet, for those who understand the risks and simply want to maintain control over their hardware, these changes introduce a substantial inconvenience.

Opposition to this shift is already organizing under the “Keep Android Open” banner. This group argues that Google is retroactively locking down an operating system that was originally marketed as the open alternative to Apple’s closed ecosystem. A point of concern for many is that these changes are not being implemented through a standard Android OS update. Instead, they are being rolled out via Google Play Services. This means the new rules can be applied to billions of existing devices without a full firmware overhaul. The rollout is scheduled to begin this month in regions including Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand, eventually expanding globally.

The tension here lies between individual autonomy and collective security. While Google’s stated intent is to minimize liability and protect users from financial theft, the methods chosen may fundamentally alter the relationship between the user and their device. I would prefer to see these options managed at the account level, allowing experienced users to opt out of the 24-hour waiting period while keeping protections active for others. As these policies take hold, we may see a rise in interest for alternative, open-source mobile operating systems like GrapheneOS, which prioritize privacy and side-loading without Google’s oversight.

Using AI to Organize and Curate My Plex Library ! (sponsored post)

Many media server enthusiasts like me spend more time managing our libraries than actually consuming the content within them. I recently looked into whether artificial intelligence could streamline this process, specifically within the Plex ecosystem.

In my latest monthly sponsored Plex video, I install a Plex MCP and connect Open AI’s Codex to see what we can do.

My goal was to see if AI could handle the organizational tasks that usually require manual input, such as curating specific story arcs or generating recommendations based on viewing history.

The bridge between the AI and the media server is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. MCPs in this context connect an AI desktop client—such as OpenAI’s Codex, Claude Desktop, or Gemini—to a local Plex instance. Setting this up requires a Plex token, which is accessible through the XML info of any media item in the library. Once the token is dropped into the configuration screen, the AI can interact with the server’s data through plain English commands. I demo this in the video.

One practical test involved creating a playlist for a specific narrative arc within Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. Rather than manually selecting episodes that contribute to the “Dominion War” storyline, I provided the AI with a text file containing an episode list sourced from a Reddit discussion. The system generated a sequential playlist in approximately ninety seconds. Beyond simple lists, the AI can also aggregate data from the web. I asked it to research the highest-rated episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation across multiple sources and build a playlist based on those aggregate ratings. While this research-heavy task took several minutes, it resulted in a curated selection based on external critical consensus without any manual sorting or list creation on my part.

The utility extends to music as well. I requested a smart playlist for 1980s pop music. By defining the decade and genre in a simple prompt, the AI configured the metadata filters within Plex to include tracks from 1980 to 1989 categorized as pop or rock. Because it was set up as a smart playlist, it automatically updates whenever new tracks fitting those criteria are added to the library in the future. This replaces the need to navigate through various menu layers to set up complex filtering rules.

Analysis of viewing habits is another area where the AI provides utility. By accessing watch history, the system can identify content that has been overlooked. For instance, I asked it to find episodes of a specific children’s show, Bluey, that had the lowest view counts to find episodes my children might have missed. It can also cross-reference a watch list with a viewing history to suggest new series. When I requested science fiction recommendations, the AI suggested several shows I had not yet watched, such as Farscape and Babylon 5. It then added these items to my Plex watch list upon request and identified which streaming services currently host them.

For those interested in more advanced automation, the AI can be used to monitor upcoming releases of TV shows and movies. I currently use a routine that scans my watch list every morning and sends an email notification when new episodes of my tracked shows are scheduled to return to streaming services or broadcast.

By using an AI as an intermediary, the technical burden of database management is replaced by a conversational interface. It’s a definite time saver and fun to play with!

See more of my Plex content here!

Walmart Onn Pro 13.2″ Tablet Review

I recently purchased the new Onn Pro 13.2-inch Android tablet from Walmart for $288 (compensated affiliate link) to see how it compares to other devices in the budget-conscious market.

In my latest video review, I take the tablet out for a spin and check out all of its features – some of which aren’t even advertised.

The tablet runs on Android 16 and features a 13.2-inch display, which is a significant size for a device at this price point. It feels substantial, weighing approximately two pounds, with a metal design and a glass display that feels thick and durable, though it lacks an anti-fingerprint coating and tends to collect dust and smudges.

The hardware includes a MediaTek 8775V processor, 8GB of RAM, and 256GB of internal storage, which can be expanded via a micro SD card slot. It carries an IP54 rating, meaning it is resistant to dust and splashes but should not be submerged.

The display has a 2400 by 1600 resolution with a 3:2 aspect ratio. While the specifications do not list a high refresh rate, I found that the settings allow for 90Hz or 120Hz, providing a more fluid visual experience than the standard 60Hz found on most entry-level tablets. However, the included pen does not function when the screen is set to 120Hz. The brightness appears to be between 400 and 450 nits, which is more than adequate for indoor use but lower than higher-end iPads.

A notable feature is the USB-C port’s ability to function as a video input. When I connected the tablet to my Mac, it prompted me to use the device as an extended display. While this worked, the tablet currently struggles with aspect ratio mapping, resulting in a squished image that distorts the desktop. There is some minor latency, but the feature shows potential as a portable monitor if future firmware updates address the scaling issues. It is important to note that the port only supports video input, not output, so the tablet cannot be mirrored onto a larger television or monitor via cable.

The tablet comes with a basic protective case and a USI 2.0 compatible pen. The pen attaches magnetically to the top of the tablet, though it does not charge there; it requires a separate USB-C connection for power. Because it follows the USI 2.0 standard, users can swap it for other compatible third-party pens. In my testing, the writing experience felt functional for note-taking or basic sketching, though there was some noticeable lag and occasional issues with palm rejection when the pen was lifted too far from the screen.

In terms of daily performance, the device handles web browsing and multitasking efficiently. I was able to run split-screen applications, such as YouTube alongside a browser, without any significant slowdown. The software environment is relatively clean, with the Walmart app being the only pre-installed software beyond standard Google services. For media consumption, the tablet supports Widevine L1, allowing for full HD playback on streaming services like Netflix. The stereo speakers are clear, though they lack deep bass, and there is no dedicated headphone jack.

Gaming performance is respectable for this hardware class. During my time with Fortnite at native resolution and low settings, I averaged between 45 and 50 frames per second. I also tested emulation; some GameCube titles ran at full speed, while PlayStation 2 emulation stayed just under full speed at around 50 frames per second depending on the game. The 3DMark Wildlife benchmark returned a score of 3,270, placing it in a similar performance bracket to the Nvidia Shield TV.

Battery life is advertised at 15 hours, which seems accurate for light tasks like reading or emailing at moderate brightness and 60Hz. Intensive tasks like gaming will reduce that runtime significantly but still provides multiple hours. It is worth noting that while a charging cable is included in the box, a power adapter is not. Additionally, this model lacks a GPS radio, which may be a consideration for users who rely on offline navigation.

Walmart typically maintains these devices on the market for about two years, and while it carries a one-year warranty, there is no formal commitment regarding future Android OS or security updates. This tablet represents a specific segment of the market where hardware value is prioritized over long-term software support.

For those looking for a large-screen Android experience without a high price tag, the Onn Pro provides a functional set of features that generally exceed the typical expectations for the budget category. It will be interesting to see if the video input functionality is refined over time, as that remains one of the more unique additions to an otherwise straightforward hardware package.

Plex at a Crossroads?

I have spent a significant amount of time covering the evolution of Plex, both as a user of over a decade and as a creator covering the home media space. I got my lifetime Plex Pass in 2015 and have been a user of Plex longer than that.

Recently, the company announced a substantial shift in its pricing model that signals a turning point for its original core product. On July 1, the cost of a lifetime Plex Pass will increase from $250 to $750. This move effectively positions the lifetime license as a deterrent rather than an incentive, clearly designed to steer new users toward recurring monthly or annual subscriptions.

In my latest video, I take a look at this new strategy and provide some of my own analysis on why Plex is doing this. While I have maintained a long-standing sponsorship relationship with Plex, my analysis of this change is based entirely on my own research and opinion – I did not have any input from the company.

It is important to distinguish between the two halves of the current Plex ecosystem: the free, ad-supported streaming side that offers live channels and on-demand content, and the personal media server software that they started with in 2008. This price hike affects only the latter, and specifically the premium features associated with the media server.

When the lifetime subscription was introduced in 2012, it served a specific purpose. As a small startup, Plex needed to demonstrate a paying user base to investors while catering to a community that traditionally avoids subscription models. Plex initially offered the Plex Pass at $3.99 a month, but received backlash from users who preferred on a one-time purchase. So Plex offered a limited time $75 lifetime license that later became a permanent offering.

My own data collection suggests that this early success has created a long-term sustainability issue. In a recent informal poll of my audience, 91% of Plex Pass holders reported being on a lifetime plan, many of whom paid once a 5-10 years ago and have not had to pay more since, despite receiving constant software updates and server maintenance.

Maintaining a modern media server is an expensive endeavor involving a team of developers in a competitive labor marketplace. From a strictly economic standpoint, the lifetime model has ceased to be viable for the personal media server side of the business. While the sky was the limit in 2012 for new users, one could argue that today that potential market is a lot smaller due to most potential users being acquired, and generational differences in how Gen Z and Alpha consume media.

We are seeing Plex react to this by shifting its focus toward the “FAST” (Free Ad-supported Streaming Television) market. Industry data shows these channels now capture nearly 7% of U.S. television viewing, a sector worth billions in potential ad revenue.

A look at the company’s recent history of investment confirms this shift. After years of modest growth, Plex received significant infusions of cash—totaling tens of millions of dollars—starting around 2021. These investments coincided with their pivot toward global streaming and ad-supported video. Today, the Plex homepage barely mentions personal media servers, focusing instead on content discovery and streaming.

This leads to a question about the future of the home server. If the new pricing fails to convert users into recurring subscribers, the company may reach a crossroads. One potential path is the “minimally viable server” model. We are already seeing hints of this through the release of a robust open API, which allows third-party developers to create their own client interfaces. Apps like Plezy are already utilizing this, offering a streamlined, community-driven experience that connects to the Plex backend without the streaming additions.

Ultimately, the personal media server is likely to survive, but its form may change. Whether it remains a primary focus of development or becomes a backend utility for independent developers will depend on how many new users are willing to trade the one-time payment for a monthly commitment. For those of us who have relied on the platform for years, the next year will reveal exactly how Plex intends to balance its roots with its aspirations for the mass market.

Walmart’s Value Packed onn 8.1″ Core Tablet Review!

Walmart’s Onn brand has emerged as one of the leading makers of budget consumer electronics. In addition to making solid TV streaming devices, they also make a line of great Android tablets that deliver a ton of value.

In my latest video, I take a look at their new Onn 8.1″ Core Tablet.

The 8.1″ device bears a clear physical resemblance to the iPad Mini but occupies a much different segment of the market. At a price point of $138 (compensated affiliate link), it aims to provide a functional tablet experience for those who prioritize cost over high-end performance.

The build quality is a notable starting point. The tablet features an all-metal aluminum back, giving it a weight of 10 ounces that feels substantial yet portable. The 8.1-inch IPS display operates at a resolution of 1000 x 1524, which is slightly above 720p. While the brightness peaks around 350 nits—noticeably lower than more expensive competitors—the pixel density remains high enough that text appears sharp and readable. One functional improvement I noticed is the display’s ability to ignore unintended inputs; resting a thumb on the edge of the screen does not interfere with scrolling, a common frustration with previous budget tablets.

Under the hood, the device runs on a Snapdragon 685 processor, a chip that has been in circulation for a couple of years. While this means the tablet will not break any speed records, it is supported by a generous 6 GB of RAM and 64 GB of internal storage. For users who need more space for offline media, there is a dedicated microSD card slot on the side. During my testing, web browsing on sites like NASA’s homepage was efficient, and the device handled split-screen multitasking with YouTube and a browser running concurrently without significant lag.

The software experience is a departure from many budget devices that come pre-loaded with third-party applications. This tablet runs a very clean, “vanilla” version of Android. Aside from the Walmart app, there is no bloatware or intrusive advertising. It also integrates Google’s Gemini AI, allowing for hands-free voice commands that can pull up weather reports or transit information, provided the device is unlocked. However, the lack of biometric security is a drawback; there is no fingerprint reader or facial recognition, requiring a PIN for every unlock.

On the hardware side, the tablet includes stereo speakers that work well in landscape mode, though it lacks a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack. Users will need to rely on the USB-C port or Bluetooth for audio. The cameras are functional but basic: the front-facing 720p lens is enough for video calls, while the 1080p rear camera captures acceptable images and video in a pinch, though the quality is much lower than what a premium device would offer.

Gaming performance varies depending on the demand of the title. For casual “instant games” or web-based applications, the tablet is responsive. More intensive games like Genshin Impact are playable on low visual settings, though they require a lengthy initial download and installation process. In benchmarks, the 3DMark Wildlife test returned a score of 646, which aligns with previous Onn Pro models using the same processor and well behind the more expensive iPad Mini. Battery life is rated at up to 15 hours for basic media consumption, though this decreases during heavy gaming or high-stress tasks.

Once again, Walmart delivers a straightforward option for those who need a portable device for reading, streaming, and basic productivity. It avoids the clutter of many affordable tablets while maintaining a build quality that feels more expensive than its price tag suggests. Keeping expectations aligned with the hardware, it offers a predictable and clean Android experience.

I’ll have a review of their new Pro version once I’m able to acquire one. Stay tuned!

“The Marketplace Took it as Far as it Could” – Broadcasters Admit NextGen TV Defeat

The over-the-air television drama continues as broadcasters continue to stumble rolling out the new ATSC 3.0 / NextgenTV broadcast standard. The original plan involved a market-based transition where both ATSC 1.0 and 3.0 signals would run in parallel, with the hopes that technical advancements of 3.0 would lure consumers to purchase new hardware and adopt the new standard.

But, a decision by major broadcasters to encrypt the new standard has created significant hurdles for both manufacturers and viewers. And now, a major broadcast group admits the market test has essentially failed and a government mandate is needed.

See more in my latest analysis video!

Ahead of this year’s National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) show in Las Vegas, broadcasters touted a new “affordable” tuning box program that they said would accelerate consumer adoption of DRM certified tuners. But as I noted in my prior video, they had very little on display beyond some circuit boards.

In a follow-up interview with TVTechnology.com, broadcast owner association Pearl TV made a stunning admission through their president Anne Schelle :

“We’re in a situation where the marketplace took it as far as it could, and this is what’s needed in order to really fully realize a full transition. So that’s basically my answer to that.”

The industry is now looking for a government mandate to move the transition forward despite consumers rejecting the expensive and limited hardware capable of decrypting their content. Broadcasters are advocating for a sunset of the 1.0 standard by 2028 in major markets, with the rest of the country following by 2030. They are also requesting that the FCC mandate the inclusion of expensive DRM certified ATSC 3.0 tuners in all new television sets. So much for the free market…

Part of the disconnect appears to stem from broadcaster misunderstanding of consumer behavior. Research cited by broadcast advocacy groups suggests consumers are willing to pay $60 for a basic converter box that tunes into a single channel at a time. My own observations of current market trends show a different preference.

Currently, the most popular items on retail platforms like Amazon are $30-40 ATSC 1.0 boxes that include recording and playback features that will be lacking in the new ATSC 3.0 “affordable” program. And selling just as strongly are gateway devices like the Tablo or HDHomeRun (compensated affiliate links). These devices allow users to watch TV on any of their devices (Smart TVs, phones, tablets etc) in the home through a single antenna connection – a level of flexibility that current encryption requirements do not allow.

An Amazon search for ATSC 3.0 tuners ordered by sales popularity shows the SiliconDust ATSC 3.0 compatible gateway that broadcasters refuse to DRM certify is outselling a certified ADTH tuning box by a rate of 10 to 1 !

The DRM encryption is at the center of this friction. When the new standard was unencrypted, there was early interest from various makers of tuning hardware. Now, the technical requirements to satisfy these DRM measures have made it difficult for manufacturers to produce affordable, high-functioning equipment. Even existing products that promised gateway functionality for encrypted signals have seen those features delayed repeatedly.

While broadcasters are waiting for a signal from regulators to force a transition, the current lack of adoption suggests that the existing encryption framework does not align with how people actually watch television in 2026.

This is not a market in need of a government mandate; it is a market that will thrive once large broadcasters stop interfering with it.

2026 Streaming Sticks Compared!

For about sixty dollars, it is possible to purchase the three most prominent budget streaming devices on the market: the Roku Streaming Stick, the Amazon Fire TV Stick HD, and Walmart’s Onn 4K streamer. While these devices provide significant functionality for less than the cost of a modern video game, the landscape of entry-level streaming is shifting. Manufacturers are increasingly relying on ad-supported content and stricter software ecosystems to subsidize these low hardware costs.

In my latest video, I recently spent time testing the latest versions of these devices to see how they manage this balance between affordability and user experience.

Check it out here!

The Roku remains a consistent choice for those who prioritize simplicity. At approximately $29, the 1080p model features an interface that, while getting increasingly cluttered with advertisements and suggested content, remains the most straightforward to navigate. The remote control included with the Roku feels more substantial and premium than those provided by Amazon or Walmart. Roku has also refined its search capabilities, integrating more intelligent results that can better answer more complex queries. While Roku has long moved away from supporting games, its dedicated sections for free, ad-supported content are well-organized and easy to locate.

In contrast, the new Fire TV Stick HD represents a significant departure for Amazon. This device runs on the new Vega operating system rather than the Android-based system used in previous generations. This shift has practical consequences for users who enjoy customizing their devices; because it is no longer Android-based, the ability to sideload third-party applications is gone. It’s game library is limited only to streamed games from Amazon’s servers. I also found the navigation on this 1080p stick to be notably sluggish. The hardware seems to struggle with the demands of downloading thumbnails and advertisements for the home screen. While it integrates well with the Alexa ecosystem and security cameras, finding free content requires more effort than it does on competing platforms.

The Onn 4K streamer from Walmart stands out as the most flexible option for power users. Despite its low price point—often around $40—it offers 4K resolution and runs on the Google TV platform. Unlike the new Fire TV, the Onn device runs with a mature Android ecosystem, allowing for the installation of various apps, emulators for classic gaming, and VPNs. It also incorporates Google’s Gemini AI, which provided the most sophisticated search results during my testing, such as filtering for specific actors across different genres. While the hardware specifications are modest, with 8GB of storage and 2GB of RAM, the device remains responsive and open to user customization.

Each of these sticks serves as a practical tool for travel. They allow users to maintain their own login credentials on a personal device rather than relying on the potentially insecure or logged-in accounts found on hotel or rental property televisions. Most support hotel Wi-Fi portals, though the reliability of these connections can vary.

Choosing between these devices depends largely on the user’s technical comfort level. The Roku is a reliable recommendation for someone who wants a dependable, no-frills experience. However, for those who value the ability to tinker with software or require 4K resolution at the lowest possible price, the Onn streamer has become the primary choice in a market that is otherwise becoming more restrictive.

The era of the open, flexible streaming stick appears to be narrowing. As major players like Amazon transition to proprietary operating systems that limit third-party software, the choice for consumers is no longer just about which remote feels better in the hand, but about how much control they are willing to trade for a lower price tag. The hardware remains inexpensive, but the true cost is increasingly measured in the space occupied by advertisements and the limitations of the software.

Needs More Linux: Lenovo IdeaCentre Mini X with ARM Snapdragon Review!

My latest Mini PC review is of a Snapdragon-powered Windows 11 mini PC from Lenovo, the IdeaCentre Mini X. At a price point hovering around $700 (compensated affiliate link), it features the Snapdragon X1-26-100, an 8-core processor, paired with 32GB of DDR5X RAM.

See my full video review here!

While the memory is soldered and cannot be upgraded, I found that the storage is more flexible; lifting the internal power supply reveals an open NVME slot for those who might want to expand beyond the included 512GB drive or eventually attempt a dual-boot setup.

The build quality of the machine is substantial. The metal frame gives it a sense of durability and weight that keeps it stationary on a desk. Unlike many mini PCs that rely on external power bricks, this model houses its power supply internally. This design choice contributes to the unit’s heft but also introduces a specific acoustic profile. I noticed that the fan dedicated to cooling the power supply remains audible even when the system is idle, producing a constant oscillation that persists regardless of the workload. A second fan on the CPU package only engages under heavy sustained loads, but the baseline noise from the internal power supply is a factor to consider for those seeking a silent workspace.

In terms of connectivity, the IdeaCentre Mini X offers a mix of modern and legacy options. It includes a 40Gbps USB 4 port on the back and several 10Gbps USB-A and USB-C ports. However, there is a lack of support for external GPUs which makes the 40Gbps port less useful. The inclusion of gigabit Ethernet also feels somewhat dated when compared to the 2.5 or 5 gigabit ports becoming standard in the mini PC market. For displays, the device provides both HDMI and DisplayPort outputs, which I found worked reliably for dual-monitor setups.

Testing the software performance revealed the current state of the Windows on ARM ecosystem. Using native ARM applications like the Brave browser resulted in a quick and responsive experience for standard web tasks and document work. However, media performance was inconsistent. While Netflix functioned well through its native app, I encountered a significant number of dropped frames when attempting to play 4K60 video through a browser on YouTube. This suggests that while the hardware is capable, driver optimization for browser-based video playback is still a work in progress.

For more intensive tasks, the results were varied. I tested a native ARM version of DaVinci Resolve and found it could handle basic 4K60 video editing and real-time transitions quite well, often outperforming similarly priced Intel or AMD mini PCs in simple rendering tasks. It is not a professional-grade workstation for heavy effects, but it is functional for clip-stringing.

The 32GB of RAM also proved useful for running local large language models. Using LM Studio, I was able to run a Gemma 4B model with respectable text output speeds. This capability, combined with a low power draw that stays between 5 and 42 watts, suggests the machine could eventually serve as an efficient home server or AI node if Linux support becomes more accessible.

Gaming remains a challenge for this platform. Since many popular titles lack native ARM ports, they must run through a compatibility layer. In my testing with Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p on the lowest settings, the system averaged only about 20 frames per second. While older titles or less demanding games might be playable, users primarily interested in gaming would likely find better performance from traditional Ryzen or Intel-based systems at this price.

The Lenovo IdeaCentre Mini X feels like a specialized tool rather than a general-purpose replacement for every user. It shows clear potential for corporate environments where the low power consumption and high RAM capacity could offer a better return on investment over a large fleet of power hungry desktops. While the platform is still maturing and certain software hurdles remain, the hardware itself is a solid example of the direction ARM-based Windows machines are taking. I plan to keep an eye on the development of Linux drivers for this unit, as that could unlock an entirely different set of use cases for this hardware in the future.

3 More Awesome Self Hosted Apps!

A few weeks ago, I shared a look at several self-hosted applications that simplify digital workflows. I have three more to discuss today, all of which share a common trait: they can be tested immediately in a web browser without the initial requirement of setting up a private server. These tools focus on utility and privacy by performing most of their tasks locally on the user’s machine rather than on a remote server.

Check them out here!

The first tool is BentoPDF, an open-source PDF toolkit designed for privacy. Unlike many online PDF editors that require you to upload documents to their servers, Bento PDF operates entirely within the browser. If you choose to self-host it, the server merely acts as a repository for the code; the actual processing happens on your computer.

I demoed a few of its many tools in the video. One was its compression utility that I put to work on a 12-megabyte document. By applying the “photon engine” algorithm, the file size was reduced to 2.6 megabytes while maintaining legible text and clear images. I demoed another tool that allows for the creation of fillable forms from static documents. I tested this with a town building permit, adding text fields and checkboxes that functioned correctly when opened in a standard PDF reader. The application also supports annotations, such as highlighting and redactions, though it does not allow for direct editing of existing text or images.

Moving from document management to media, Retro Assembly is a library and emulation platform for retro gaming. It functions as a ROM manager that serves the game files to your browser, which then handles the emulation locally. This architecture allows for a consistent experience across different devices. I tested a game on my computer, saved the state, and was able to pick up exactly where I left off on my mobile phone.

The interface is organized similarly to media managers like Plex, automatically pulling in metadata for a clean visual library. While it supports many 8-bit and 16-bit systems, its performance on higher-end systems like the PlayStation depends on the processing power of the device you are using to play. It does not currently support certain platforms like Sega CD, but for cartridge-based games, the experience is stable.

The third application is Feed Zero, a relatively new open-source RSS reader. RSS remains a practical way to follow multiple websites in a single place, and Feed Zero offers a feature often reserved for paid services: the ability to pull in the full text of an article even if the original feed only provides a short snippet.

The application stores your subscription data and reading history locally in the browser. For those who want to sync their feeds across devices, it offers an encrypted cloud sync option where the data is secured on your device before being sent to their server. Alternatively, it can be self-hosted to keep all data within your own network. While it is still in active development—YouTube integration is currently limited—it is a lightweight and functional alternative to centralized news aggregators.

These applications demonstrate the capabilities of web browsers as application platforms. For those interested in self-hosting, tools like Unraid (compensated affiliate link) provide a straightforward entry point for managing these applications via Docker containers.

See more videos like this here!

New Onn 4k Pro Streaming Box Review – 2026 Version

My latest review takes a look at the new Onn 4K Pro, which serves as the current top-of-the-line streaming device from Walmart. Priced at $60 (compensated affiliate link), this unit represents an update to the model released two years ago. I purchased the device with my own funds to evaluate its performance both as a standard consumer streaming box and as a tool for more enthusiast-level use cases.

Check out the review here!

The hardware features a fabric covering (in light grey or black) intended to help it blend into home decor, a design choice necessitated by the built-in microphones that allow for hands-free operation. On the exterior, there is a physical switch to disable the microphone for those concerned with privacy. The device also includes a remote finder button on the top, which triggers a beep from the remote to help locate it. In terms of connectivity, the back panel houses an HDMI output, a USB 2.0 port for external storage or peripherals, and a 100 Mbps Ethernet jack. While the inclusion of a wired port is useful, I found that the onboard Wi-Fi actually provided significantly faster data speeds, reaching approximately 500 Mbps compared to the 100 Mbps limit of the physical jack.

Internally, the device runs on an Amlogic S905X5M processor with 3GB of RAM and 32GB of storage. During my testing, the interface felt responsive, and navigating through various menus was efficient. The device supports Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos for mainstream streaming services like Netflix and Disney Plus.

The software experience is centered on the Google TV interface and includes a dedicated button for free ad-supported television, which provides quick access to a variety of free streaming channels (including some local NBC affiliates). The integration of Gemini, Google’s AI assistant, allows for more complex voice queries than standard voice search. For instance, the assistant can filter recommendations by specific actors or provide deep dives into educational topics. When the television is off, the box can function as a standalone smart speaker for controlling home automation devices.

For those interested in high-fidelity media playback, the Onn 4K Pro presents some challenges. While it supports frame rate matching in certain apps like Netflix, other major platforms like Disney Plus and Apple TV did not switch to 24p mode during my tests, which can lead to motion jitter. Furthermore, for users with local media libraries, the device does not support Dolby Vision Profile 7 or lossless audio pass-through. This distinguishes it from more expensive enthusiast hardware like the Nvidia Shield, which remains the standard for handling high-bitrate Blu-ray rips.

Although the hardware is 64-bit, the operating system is currently a 32-bit version of Android 14. This prevents certain applications, particularly high-end emulators, from running on the device.

Benchmarks indicate that this processor is roughly three times faster than the previous Onn model and outperforms the current Google TV Streamer, though it still falls significantly short of the aging Nvidia Shield. This puts the device in a specific market position. It is a capable, affordable option for the average user seeking a snappy interface and integrated smart home features, but it stops short of being a comprehensive solution for the most demanding home theater enthusiasts and gamers.

Owners of the previous version may find little reason to switch, as many of the new software features have been backported to the older hardware. Choosing this device ultimately depends on whether the faster navigation and hands-free Google Assistant features outweigh the technical constraints of its 32-bit architecture.

Gadget Haul 15 is Up! Eight More Gadget Reviews !

I accumulated enough stuff to do my next video in my Gadget Haul series! Some of these items were purchased with personal funds, while others were provided by manufacturers for review. No external parties have reviewed or approved these observations prior to publication, and all opinions expressed are my own.

Check out the video here and see the most of the featured items on Amazon (compensated affiliate link).

The first item is the Trustkernel Plugmate (compensated affiliate link). While it resembles a standard memory stick, it is actually a self-contained Android 14 computer on a stick powered by a MediaTek Helio G80 processor with 4 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage.

It connects to a host device—whether running iOS, Android, Windows, or macOS—via USB and streams its interface through a dedicated app. This setup is designed for privacy, as data remains on the stick rather than the host. It is paired with a host device with a QR code – nobody can pick it up and just start using it. Just don’t lose the booklet the QR code is printed on! In addition to the secure pairing, it requires a pin code to access on the host device. A duress password can also be set that triggers an immediate data wipe.

During testing, the metal casing became significantly hot to the touch, and the USB connection introduced enough latency to make fast-paced gaming difficult. It does not have an internal battery and relies on the host device for power. The Plugmate came in free of charge from the manufacturer.

The Wuben X1 Pro (compensated affiliate link) is a heavy, all-metal tactical flashlight rated at IP65 for water resistance. It features a turbo mode capable of 12,300 lumens, which activates an internal cooling fan to manage heat. The device uses two replaceable lithium-ion batteries and includes a USB-C port that allows it to function as a power bank for mobile devices. It offers both spotlight and floodlight configurations, and the system remembers the last brightness setting used. The flashlight came in free of charge from Wuben.

The next item is the Roku Voice Remote Pro (compensated affiliate link) that I purchased with my own funds. The primary update to this version is a motion-activated backlight for better visibility in dark rooms. It adds physical buttons for a live TV guide and a customizable button for app shortcuts. The remote supports hands-free voice commands, including a remote finder feature, though the microphone can be disabled with a physical switch to extend battery life. It charges via USB-C and is compatible with most existing Roku hardware, including low-end streaming sticks and Roku TVs.

Next up are a couple of USB-C docks. The first is the Beelink Mate Pro (compensated affiliate link), a USB 4 and Thunderbolt-compatible device that serves as a port expander, speaker/microphone and a direct-attached storage array. It contains four NVMe slots supporting up to 32 TB of storage. It also includes an integrated speaker and microphone for conference calls, and it can deliver 96 watts of power to a host computer. However, performance benchmarks showed some limitations: The 2.5 gigabit Ethernet port delivered approximately 1.1 gigabits on downstream tests, and the storage read/write speeds were lower than expected for NVME storage, likely due to the internal configuration of the dock’s USB bus. The dock came in free of charge from Beelink.

Another docking option is the EZQuest 8-in-1 portable hub (compensated affiliate link). While labeled as USB 4 on the casing, its data modes operate at USB 3.0 Gen 2 speeds at 10 Gbps. It successfully supported two 4K displays at 60Hz during testing, but users should note that high-speed Thunderbolt peripherals will not operate at their full potential through this hub and sometimes not at all. But it does provide seven USB-C ports in total and supports 100-watt power delivery pass-through.

For personal cooling, I tested the Dyson Hushjet (compensated affiliate link), a portable USB-rechargeable fan I purchased with my own funds. It operates at 65,000 RPM to move air through a narrow column. While effective at directing airflow toward the face, the fan produces a significant level of noise even on lower settings. It includes an adjustable head and a neck strap for hands-free use.

Finally, I examined two products from OhSnap that you can find here (compensated affiliate link). The first is a magnetic grip and stand designed for MagSafe-equipped phones. It allows for both portrait and landscape orientation and remains thin enough to permit wireless charging without being removed.

The second Ohsnap item is the Snap Pack, a 5,000 mAh battery. It features Magsafe attach points on both the front and back, allowing other accessories—such as the grip stand or a portable hard drive—to be stacked on top of the battery while it is attached to the phone. It supports Qi2 wireless charging at 15 watts and can provide 20 watts of power through its USB-C port. Note that the rear magsafe port does not provide power.

I hope you enjoyed this latest gadget haul! I’ll do another one after I accumulate more stuff ! See my previous hauls here and subscribe to my gadget picks channel for more like this!

Utah Age Verification Law Targets VPN Users

I have been closely following a significant shift in how states are approaching internet privacy and content regulation. This week, a new law takes effect in Utah that requires adult content websites to verify the age of their users. While similar laws exist in states like Texas and Florida, Utah is introducing a provision that changes the technical landscape for both users and website operators.

This is the subject of my latest tech analysis video.

What distinguishes this law is its specific focus on location-masking tools. Traditionally, when a state passes such a mandate, many websites simply block any traffic originating from an IP address within that state to avoid liability. Utah, however, is now asserting that its regulations apply to anyone physically located within the state, even if they are using a Virtual Private Network (VPN) or a proxy server to appear as though they are browsing from elsewhere. This places the burden of identification squarely on the website operators rather than the individuals.

In my review of the legislation, I noticed that it requires operators to employ “commercially reasonable” methods to verify age, such as digitized ID cards or third-party verification services. The challenge here is technical. Experts in the field, including major VPN providers, have pointed out that it is essentially impossible for a website to identify every VPN IP address in real time. Because these addresses change constantly, a website cannot reliably know if a user is appearing from a different state or is a Utah resident using a masking tool. This leads to a scenario where websites might feel forced to require identification from every single visitor, regardless of their apparent location, simply to avoid the risk of heavy fines from Utah.

The law includes language intended to protect bonafide news and public interest organizations, but the definition of what qualifies as “bonafide” remains at the discretion of government officials. This introduces a level of subjectivity that many constitutional rights organizations find concerning. While the current focus is strictly on adult content, the legal framework provides a potential template for future restrictions on other types of controversial material. I have seen how legislative language can be adjusted over time; a few small changes or creative legal interpretations by courts could potentially expand these requirements to any content deemed to lack certain artistic or political value for minors.

This development in Utah reflects a broader trend I have been tracking across the country. There are ongoing discussions in other states about moving age verification to the operating system level. If that were to happen, a user’s computer or smartphone would act as a permanent digital ID, authenticating their identity to every website they visit. This would move the internet away from its historically anonymous roots toward a model of constant authentication.

While the Supreme Court has previously upheld the constitutionality of age verification laws in other states, Utah’s specific attempt to regulate VPN usage presents a new set of legal and technical questions. It remains to be seen how the courts will view a mandate that requires companies to solve a technically intractable problem.

As these laws proliferate, the focus may shift from whether content should be restricted to how the very infrastructure of the internet is being redesigned to enforce those restrictions.