Month: September 2024

ATSC 3.0 Update: Did Broadcasters Mislead the FCC on LG Patent Suit Impact?

I’ve been closely following the transition of over-the-air television in the U.S. to the new ATSC 3.0 standard, also known as NextGenTV. Initially, the process appeared smooth, but things started to take a turn. Broadcasters began encrypting channels, making them inaccessible to viewers. Then, the industry was hit with a significant lawsuit that forced LG, one of the largest TV manufacturers, to pull its ATSC 3.0 tuners off the market.

In my latest video, we take a look at how the industry is responding to this lawsuit one year out. Broadcast industry association Pearl TV told the FCC last year that this lawsuit had no impact on the transition to ATSC 3.0, but they told a very different story to an appeals court hearing the case last week.

That lawsuit, filed by Constellation Designs, didn’t seek an astronomical sum—only $1.6 million in damages. But the real issue was the future costs: LG would have to pay a $6.75 royalty per unit for every television equipped with the tuner. This rate was about six times what they were paying to the patent pool for other related patents. LG, understandably, decided to exit the market rather than absorb those costs.

Fast forward to the present, and the broadcasters’ association, Pearl TV, has filed a brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals. They argue that the lawsuit could jeopardize the transition to ATSC 3.0. Their concern is that other patent holders, seeing the success of Constellation Designs, might also opt out of the patent pool, potentially leading to more lawsuits and higher costs for manufacturers. If that happens, they fear other TV manufacturers might follow LG’s lead and exit the market as well.

What’s interesting, though, is that Pearl TV’s message to the FCC last year was quite different. After the lawsuit, they downplayed the issue, saying everything was fine and there was no need for the FCC to intervene. They argued that the patent pools were functioning well and that there was no sign of market failure.

Despite Pearl’s reassurance to the FCC, the market tells a different story. Only a handful of new televisions this year included ATSC 3.0 tuners, and most are found only in high-end televisions that aren’t affordable for everyone. Panasonic’s recent announcement of their return to the U.S. market with TVs featuring ATSC 3.0 tuners adds some hope. However, those tuners won’t be activated until a future firmware update, and there’s no clear timeline for when that will happen.

The broader issue here seems to be that broadcasters are attempting to turn this new standard into a proprietary one. With ATSC 1.0, if a manufacturer’s product meets the FCC’s standards, they can build a tuner and sell it on the market. But under ATSC 3.0, manufacturers must get approval from broadcasters, pay for testing and certifications, and potentially face high royalty fees from DRM, which could make it financially unfeasible for many small hardware and software companies to participate.

The result is that consumers may end up paying more for television access, and options will remain limited – especially as the DRM encryption prevents the use of gateway devices that allow in-home streaming to televisions not connected to an antenna. This is particularly concerning given that broadcasters use public airwaves for free.

I’ve been encouraging viewers to make their voices heard with the FCC regarding these issues. Many have already submitted filings, and the ATSC 3.0 proceeding is now one of the FCC’s top concerns. It’s clear that public dissatisfaction with the transition is growing.

With a U.S. election coming up, followed by a presidential transition, this is a pivotal moment to influence how the FCC approaches the ATSC 3.0 standard. There’s an opportunity to ensure that the new standard benefits consumers, not just broadcasters. The more public feedback that can be submitted now, the better the chances of ensuring a fair and accessible transition.

Tech Dispatch from Germany!

I spent this past week in Germany attending some events ahead of the IFA consumer electronics trade show. IFA is the European equivalent to CES here in the United States. Lenovo sponsored this trip, covering my travel expenses. No additional compensation was received.

See my latest dispatch video from the show here!

My report consists of things I found of interest at two press events – one sponsored by Showstoppers that showcased products from 80 different companies, and a press event Lenovo held at a very cool industrial venue called Kraftwerks.

Showstoppers had a few cool gadgets on display, including some neat mechanical keyboards from Epomaker, a monstrous looking modular yard maintenance device called the “Yarbo,” and a bunch of other cool gadgets.

Pre-pandemic, IFA was always Lenovo’s huge showcase event. This year was the first time since the pandemic that Lenovo pulled out all the stops for a major IFA presentation. You can see just how extensive the presentation was in my dispatch video.

Lenovo’s presentation did not have any groundbreaking new product announcements, with the exception of a concept PC featuring a lid that automatically opens and tracks the user’s movements. But they did show off some nice PCs including a number of sub $1,000 ARM windows machines running with Snapdragon X Plus processors.

What was interesting was the fact that Intel is no longer the dominant chip platform for PCs – there was equal billing given to AMD and Qualcomm both in the keynote presentation and in product announcements. All three chipmakers now have PCs compatible with the Microsoft Co-Pilot+ AI specification that allows for on-device AI processing.

I was unable to stay for the rest of the IFA show due to the costs I would incur for full coverage. But hopefully this dispatch gives you a taste of what tech companies will be marketing to European users in the months ahead.

If you liked the style of this video I have hours more of it! See my dispatches playlist for coverage of CES, other regional product showcases and more! If you’re curious about what I use to cover these events I’m now using just my iPhone with a Sennheiser AVX microphone attached. You can see my set up in this video.

My next dispatch will likely be at the end of October for Pepcom’s holiday preview show in New York City. Stay tuned!

8bitDo Pro 2 Hall Effect Stick Game Controller Review

The 8bitdo Pro 2 has long been my favorite game controller, and now with the introduction of hall effect analog sticks, it has seen a notable upgrade. You can see it in action in my latest review.

Unlike its predecessor, which used Alps-based potentiometers, the hall effect sticks rely on magnetic sensors. This results in a smoother, more precise control with reduced chances of stick drift over time. While the rest of the controller remains largely the same, this improvement is a nice step forward for those looking for durability and accuracy in gameplay.

The hall effect sticks provide a high degree of sensitivity and precision, with very little dead zone by default. This is a step up from the older model, which often experienced stick drift after prolonged use. The vibration motors remain strong, and the d-pad, a staple of the 8bitdo Pro series, continues to impress, especially for retro gaming enthusiasts.

The price point remains around $50, with several color options available, including crystal blue, green, & purple, along with more retro styles like a Game Boy color scheme. Its design remains faithful to the original, featuring a PlayStation-style layout that many users have come to appreciate. A standout feature is its wide compatibility, supporting platforms such as PCs, the Nintendo Switch, Steam Deck, iOS and ChromeOS. It unfortunately lacks support for PlayStation and Xbox consoles. Its motion controls work well with titles like Mario Odyssey.

One of the controller’s strengths is its configurability. Through 8bitdo’s Ultimate Software, users can remap buttons, set macros, and adjust the sensitivity of both the sticks and triggers.

The controller offers versatility in power options, supporting both an included removable rechargeable battery and standard AA batteries. While Bluetooth is the primary wireless connection, users who prefer a more stable and lower-latency experience may opt to connect via USB.

In terms of gameplay, the hall effect sticks feel smoother and more consistent compared to the older Alps-based sticks. This improvement may seem subtle, but for gamers familiar with the older Pro 2 model, it is a noticeable and welcome improvement. The original was not bad by any means but this just feels better.

Overall, the 8bitdo Pro 2 with hall effect sticks feels like a refined version of an already excellent controller. The improvements in stick precision and durability, combined with its continued versatility, make it a solid recommendation for anyone in need of a high-quality gaming controller. While the changes may not seem drastic at first glance, I would recommend buyers seek out the hall effect version for the best results.

Disclaimer: 8bitdo provided the controller free of charge. However they did not review or approve this content before it was uploaded.

Apple Skirts New EU Requirements on Replaceable Batteries

Apple recently sent out invitations for an event on September 9th, likely to announce the iPhone 16. This announcement has sparked discussions on social media about the battery longevity of current iPhones along with dashed hopes of user replaceable batteries. We take a deeper dive in my latest video.

After a year of use, my iPhone 15 Pro Max’s battery capacity has decreased by about 8%, with 278 charging cycles logged. While I’ve noticed a reduction in overall battery life from when I first purchased the phone, it is doing slightly better than where my iPhone 14 Pro was at a year ago. This might be due to the iPhone 14 Pro having a smaller battery and thus more charging cycles. Either way I’m well within the stated performance expectations for Apple’s iPhone batteries.

Apple claims that the iPhone 15 models are designed to retain 80% of their original capacity after 1,000 complete charge cycles, a step up from the 500 cycle claim for the iPhone 14 and earlier models.

This improvement seems to align with a new European Union regulation that mandates user-replaceable batteries, but with a significant loophole if batteries can maintain, you guessed it, 80% capacity after 1,000 charge cycles. If a device can maintain at least 80% capacity after 1,000 full charge cycles and is waterproof, it is exempt from the regulation, meaning Apple can continue producing phones with non-user-replaceable batteries. One might argue that Apple engineered to the spec, or perhaps Apple’s lobbyists helped engineer a law that meets their hardware performance levels.

Apple provides guidelines on maximizing battery lifespan, emphasizing the importance of keeping your phone cool, especially during charging. They recommend avoiding exposure to temperatures above 95°F (35°C), which can permanently damage battery capacity. Many of us, myself included, charge our phones wirelessly or use fast chargers, both of which generate heat and contribute to battery degradation. Apple also suggests that phone cases can trap heat, further accelerating battery wear.

For those considering battery replacement, Apple offers the service for $100, but there’s a catch. If your phone has any other damage, such as a cracked screen, Apple will require you to fix that first, potentially turning a $100 battery replacement into a much more expensive repair. While it’s possible to replace the battery yourself using a guide from iFixit, the process is complicated and requires specialized tools.

Anecdotally, based on comments I’ve seen, it seems people who avoid fully charging their phones every time and opt for slower wired chargers might experience better battery longevity than those of us who use faster, heat-generating charging options.

Plex Pass New Quality of Life Features (sponsored post)

For this month’s sponsored Plex video we take a look at a few several minor yet useful features for its Plex Pass subscribers that might enhance the overall user experience. While these features may not seem groundbreaking, they can offer a more tailored and convenient viewing experience. Take a look in my latest video.

One of the new features, “Rewind on Resume,” is designed for those moments when you’re interrupted mid-viewing. Instead of resuming exactly where you left off, this feature allows the video to rewind a specified number of seconds, helping you remember what was happening before you paused. This could be particularly useful for those who, like many of us, find themselves frequently interrupted by daily life.

Another feature adds player controls for the “Skip Intro” and “Skip Credits” options that were previously only set at the server level. Users can choose to have intros and credits skipped automatically, manually, or not at all, depending on their preference. This is especially convenient for binge-watchers who want to skip past the end credits of a concluding episode and the intro credits on the subsequent one.

For those who utilize Plex’s DVR feature, there’s an option to automatically skip commercials during playback. However, this only applies to content recorded via the DVR and not to manually added other content. This feature, like the skip intro and credits options, can be customized to the user’s preference, allowing for automatic skipping or manual control.

Of note – the skip features are not yet available on every Plex player. Unfortunately Apple devices do not have these player-level controls at the time of this post.

Another little feature will provide some help for those of us who often fall asleep in front of the TV. Called the “Passout Protection” feature, this setting allows the user to set a time limit after which the playback will stop. This can be set for one to three hours, with a prompt asking if you’re still watching before the playback stops. Alternatively, this prompt can be disabled for those who prefer uninterrupted viewing.

Lastly, Plex has enhanced its music player, Plexamp, with a feature called “Mix Builder.” This allows users to create playlists based on selected artists or albums. Unlike some other Plexamp features that can take you on a musical journey, this feature lets users curate their own listening experience by locking the playlist onto specific artists or albums.

While these features may not revolutionize your Plex experience, they do offer small improvements that can make using the service more enjoyable. For those with a Plex Pass and compatible devices, exploring these options might reveal some valuable enhancements to your media consumption habits.

Disclaimer: This post & video was sponsored by Plex but they did not review or approve the content before it was posted.