Month: September 2024

The Google TV Streamer Review

I recently had the chance to test out Google’s latest TV streaming device, which is set to replace their lower-priced Chromecasts. Priced at $99 (compensated affiliate link), this device enters the more premium side of the market without the premium features enthusiasts might be expecting.

You can see more in my latest video.

The packaging includes a power adapter, a USB power cable, and a remote, but no HDMI cable, which is worth noting for anyone planning to hook it up to a 4K TV. The remote control has a new customizable button that can be programmed to launch apps or switch inputs. I also found it to be very responsive for voice queries.

The Streamer does include gigabit Ethernet offering faster connectivity if you have an ethernet connection nearby.

Surprisingly it does not feature the latest Wi-Fi technology. While lower cost devices now have Wi-Fi 6 onboard, this one is running with the older AC technology. It’ll still work with any Wi-Fi access point, but it may not do as well on busy wireless networks.

The device performs smoothly, and I found its responsiveness to be impressive, especially when navigating apps like Netflix, Prime Video, and Disney Plus. Dolby Vision and Atmos audio worked as expected through those services. However, it still hasn’t solved the 24p playback issue that affects many TV shows and movies shot at 24 frames per second. Netflix handled it, but Prime Video and Disney Plus did not switch properly in my tests. This will likely be a deal-breaker for home theater enthusiasts.

Another deal breaker for enthusiasts is that the device does not passthrough lossless audio or HDR formats from high bit rate Blu-Ray rips.

The box is running Android 14, although I did not notice many differences from prior versions of Android with Google TV. Google is now integrating some AI-powered synopses of show details and audience reviews but these are mostly very brief summaries. But issues with Google TV’s universal watchlist persist – such as not being able to add Netflix shows to it.

One fun addition is the integration of AI-generated screen savers. You can request custom artwork directly, which is a neat feature. The AI-generated images it created, such as a Siberian Husky playing video games, were a whimsical touch but not something to base a purchasing decision on.

The Streamer supports the Matter home automation standard, making it compatible with a growing range of smart home devices, although my experience with Matter devices has been mixed. The one device I have on hand compatible with the standard did not work correctly.

Gaming performance doesn’t match the price point, especially when compared to the almost-ten-year-old Nvidia Shield which absolutely smokes the Streamer in benchmark tests. Even simple games like Crossy Road lag a bit. Game streaming worked fine, however, but I did notice quite a bit of input lag when using a bluetooth game controller.

Overall, the device works well for casual streaming and home automation, but the price feels steep given that other devices offer similar features for less. If you’re invested in Google’s ecosystem or interested in the future of Matter-compatible home devices, it may be worth a look, but budget-conscious consumers will find better value elsewhere.

See more reviews of devices like this one here!

Loading a 30 Year Old SimCity 2000 Save Game File

I am a digital packrat. I have a blob of data that I started way back in the early 80s on my Apple II. It includes Bank Street Writer files from elementary school, and nearly all of my school assignments throughout middle school, high school and college. It also includes at least one SimCity save game file I made way back in March, 1994.

I was eager to see if the file would still boot up. I likely made it on my Mac PowerBook that I got in December of 1993 so I figured a Mac emulator would be a good place to start.

There’s a quick turn-key solution out there called Infinite Mac that lets you boot up a number of different classic Mac configurations in your web browser! They even have a copy of SimCity 2000 already installed. I demoed the emulator in this video from a few years ago:

Initially SimCity did not recognize the file and I couldn’t open it up. But what likely happened was that at some point in the 90’s I copied the file onto my Windows PC for safe keeping and it lost some of its embedded file information. Enter the Mac utility ResEdit that helps manually assign those values.

To figure out what those values were I created a new city and saved it and got the “type” and “creator” for that working file. Once I entered the values in the old file I reloaded SimCity 2000 and voila!

My city is a bit of a mess as it kind of just grew over time without doing much urban planning to get it up and running. I’ve had fun this weekend trying to improve the underground utilities and transportation systems, but I do think the bulldozer will be needed soon to get everything whipped into shape.

The early 90’s were a golden era for PC gaming. PCs of course had the advantage of significantly more storage space and processing power vs. the cartridge-based console titles at the time. But there was more to it than just greater system resources. Developers came up with fun and inventive new gaming concepts. We were blessed with Sierra’s adventure games (including talkie CD-ROMs), awesome flight sims, space simulators like Wing Commander and X-Wing, and of course the dawn of first person shooters with Wolfenstein 3D and Doom.

Plaud AI NotePin Review

I recently got my hands on the NotePin by Plaud AI, a compact and wearable voice recorder with a robust set of AI tools attached through its accompanying mobile app. Plaud’s value-add is that they’ve simplified the process of generating transcriptions (complete with speaker detection) along with AI generated summaries.

You can see it in action in my latest review.

The NotePin is priced at $169 (compensated affiliate link) with an additional $79 per year subscription for the “Pro Plan” that includes additional monthly transcription minutes and additional summarization templates.

The free plan, however, is still quite functional, offering 300 minutes (5 hours) of transcription per month along with the summaries of those transcriptions. The Pro Plan comes with 1,200 monthly minutes (or 20 hours) of transcription time.

All of its AI magic happens in the cloud. The NotePin itself is just an audio recorder with 64 GB of storage and enough battery life to run for well over 10 hours between charges. It’s small, lightweight, and comes with accessories to wear it on your wrist, neck, or clipped to your clothes.

One of the things I would have liked to see is a clearer indication that the device is recording. The small red light that turns on is easy to miss, especially when it’s placed on a desk. That said, the recording process is straightforward: press down on the center of the NotePine to start and stop recording, with some haptic feedback to confirm the action.

The Plaud App handles all of the file management and transcription. The device connects via Bluetooth, and while that’s functional, transferring files takes time—an hour-long recording might take five to ten minutes to fully transfer. There’s an option to switch to Wi-Fi mode to speed this up, but it’s not on by default. Once a recording is transferred, you can either keep it as an audio file or send it to the cloud for transcription and summarization.

I tested this at a recent school board meeting, where I was surprised at how well it picked up voices across a large room. After uploading the audio to the app, the transcription process was smooth.

It labels the speakers, but you need to manually assign names to the voices in each session. It unfortunately doesn’t retain the voice prints of speakers that have been identified in prior sessions, so speakers need to be labeled every time. The app doesn’t always differentiate between speakers accurately, especially when they’re far from the microphone, but overall, the transcription quality was impressive.

What I found most interesting was the summary feature. The app generates a concise breakdown of the meeting, highlighting key points and action items. You can also adjust the summary format based on the type of meeting. The summary was mostly accurate, though there were a few minor mistakes. But for anyone looking to quickly capture the essence of a discussion without diving deep into the details, I found it to be quite effective. The minutes can be exported into a number of popular formats like Word, PDF and Markdown.

Another useful feature is that you can upload audio from other sources into the app for transcription, meaning you’re not limited to recordings made on the Note Pin itself.

If you don’t exceed the free five hours of transcription per month, I found you won’t need to pay anything extra, though that could change in the future. Many companies I’ve covered in the past discover that a robust set of free server-side features are often hard to sustain over the long term.

If you’re in need of a quick, easy, and compact tool for turning meeting recordings into transcripts and summaries without much hassle, this could be a good fit. It’s not doing anything that you couldn’t do yourself with free transcription tools and services like ChatGPT, but I like the turnkey simplicity that Plaud has put together along with an elegant and simple piece of hardware.

Disclosure: Plaud.AI provided the NotePin to the channel free of charge. They did not review or approve this review before it was posted and all of the opinions express are my own.

Frontier Fiber 2 Years Later

I first reviewed Frontier’s Optic Service here in Connecticut two years ago when my Dad had the 500/500 service installed. My mother had the service installed at her place a year later. Recently, I received a lot of comments asking how well the service is holding up. For the most part, it’s been stable, but there are a few key things to watch out for, especially when it comes to billing.

You can find out more in my latest video.

The service itself has been great in terms of bandwidth and reliability, even in challenging areas like my father’s home near the beach, where salty air causes corrosion on traditional coax wires and connectors. Compared to cable services, which often needed repair due to corroded connectors, Frontier’s fiber optic technology has been much more reliable for him.

However, it’s not all good news, particularly when it comes to customer support and billing. When my mom signed up, she encountered multiple issues. Her initial service order was botched, resulting in two accounts being set up, and it took several rounds of customer service calls to sort out.

After a year of service, her bill began to creep up. Initially, her service package cost around $150 per month, but as promotions ended and prices increased, she found herself paying $300 more annually, with no change in the level of service. By mid-2024, her bill had risen to nearly $176, mainly due to increases in the base price for the Internet service, the expiration of promotional discounts for YouTube TV, and a reduction in the autopay discount.

Frontier’s online tools for managing the account were less than helpful. When I attempted to change her service plan, their website crashed. Despite the challenges, it may be worthwhile to switch her to Frontier’s newer, more affordable 200 Mbps symmetrical plan, which didn’t exist when she first signed up.

Frontier now offers higher-end packages with speeds of up to 7 gigabits per second across most of their fiber service area. But, as impressive as that may sound, it’s not necessarily practical, since most online services usually top out at around 2 gigs. Also of note, Comcast’s Gigabit Pro costs about the same as the 7 gig plan with a more robust metro ethernet connection.

Frontier may soon be acquired by Verizon in a $20 billion deal. If the acquisition goes through, it would mark an ironic turn of events, as Verizon had previously sold off its copper landline assets and pole attachments to Frontier.

The deal still requires shareholder and regulatory approval, and there are concerns within the financial community about whether it will benefit Verizon. In the meantime, Frontier customers should keep an eye on their bills. While the service itself is reliable, navigating customer support and billing issues will sadly be an ongoing challenge.

Beelink SEi14 Core Ultra 5 Mini PC Review

The Beelink SEi14 is positioned as a high-end Mini PC with solid performance and notable upgradeability. You can see more in my latest review!

Powered by the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H processor, this device comes with a price tag of $679, although the initial list price is $799, with a coupon currently offering a $120 discount. It’s equipped with 32 GB of DDR5 dual channel memory, upgradeable to 96 GB, and features a 1TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD, with a 4.0 NVME second slot available for additional storage.

The build quality of the SEi14 looks and feels nice with its aluminum case, a design seemingly inspired by Apple, though the back and bottom are plastic. It doesn’t come with a VESA mount, making it more of a desktop unit.

In terms of connectivity, the SEi14 provides a wide array of ports, including USB Type-C, USB-A, and dual-display output via HDMI and DisplayPort, supporting 4K at 60Hz. It also includes a Thunderbolt 4 port in the pack, capable of handling external GPUs and fast storage. Its ethernet port runs at 2.5 Gbps, but unlike other Mini PCs with two, this one only has a single ethernet port.

The system is quiet even under heavy load. Power consumption, however, hovers around 32 watts at idle which is a bit higher than some of the other Mini PCs we’ve looked at lately. It’ll run at 86 watts under heavy load. The 3DMark Timespy stress test reported that the system can maintain stable performance over time, even when under heavy load.

When it comes to real-world performance, the SEi14 performed adequately across a range of tasks. Web browsing is fast, and it handled 4K 60fps video playback without issues. On the gaming front, it managed to play titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 and No Man’s Sky at 1080p with frame rates around 45-50 frames per second, albeit on the lowest settings. Benchmark tests indicated its performance is consistent with expectations for devices equipped with this Intel Core Ultra processor.

For creators, basic video editing tasks are feasible, and while professional-level 3D rendering or color grading would require external GPU support, everyday editing tasks should be manageable on this machine.

For users preferring Linux, Ubuntu ran with few issues, though the system’s Intel-based Wi-Fi adapter wasn’t immediately recognized, a problem likely solvable with future driver updates. Wired Ethernet worked as expected, and overall performance was smooth.

The SEi14 is a well-rounded, premium Mini PC for those who require more from a compact form factor. Its price might be higher than some alternatives, but its combination of upgradeability, performance, and quiet operation makes it an option worth considering for those in need of a reliable, versatile Mini PC.

Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid Review – Windows and Android Laptop / Tablet

I recently got my hands on a device that stands out for its unconventional approach: the Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid. At first glance, it looks like your average Lenovo laptop, but there’s a twist. The screen detaches, transforming that portion of the device into an Android tablet while Windows still runs on the keyboard deck.

You can see it in action in my latest review.

This hybrid setup is well executed, although it comes with a hefty price tag of around $3,500. For that, you get the laptop, the detachable 14-inch 2.8K OLED touch display, a pen, and a stand. While the package is convenient, it’s worth noting that you could buy separate devices for less, but Lenovo seems to be betting on the appeal of having everything in one.

On the Windows side, the laptop is powered by a Core Ultra 7 155H processor, 32GB of RAM, and a 1TB SSD. The Android tablet features a Snapdragon 8+ processor, 12GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. The device weighs in at around 3.87 pounds, heavier than other laptops, but considering it doubles as both a laptop and a tablet, it’s understandable.

Both systems run simultaneously, so pulling the screen off the keyboard deck will immediately switch the tablet display from Windows to Android. Windows will continue to run on the keyboard deck but a display will need to be connected to the keyboard deck in order for user interaction.

It’s also possible to switch between Windows and Android when the display is attached with a specialized key on the keyboard. When the key is pressed Windows continues to run but the keyboard, trackpad, webcam and pen all connect to Android.

One of the more unique features of the Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid is its “hybrid stream” functionality. This allows you to stream the Android tablet’s screen directly to the Windows side. Essentially, you can control the Android interface within a window on the Windows desktop, allowing for a fluid experience when switching between tasks. It’s a handy way to interact with Android apps without having to physically switch back and forth between the two systems. However, the reverse isn’t possible—you can’t control the Windows side from Android. While the stream works smoothly, there’s some minor lag, especially noticeable when using the touch display.

Another cross-system feature is the built-in file syncing between the two operating systems. Lenovo has included a shared folder, which appears as an “A:\” drive on the Windows side. This feature allows you to sync files between the Android and Windows systems. For example, if you save a file in the shared folder, it becomes accessible on both the Windows desktop and the Android tablet. This syncing isn’t live, so you’ll need to ensure you’re not editing the same file on both systems simultaneously to avoid conflicts. It’s not the most seamless integration, but it provides a functional way to share files across the two platforms when working between Android and Windows.

As far as battery life goes, you can get up to 20 hours of use if you switch between operating systems strategically. The Windows component does have a nice large 75wh battery which should get through most of a workday on its own.

Gaming and video editing are possible on both Windows and Android, though the hardware limitations might affect more demanding tasks. The Snapdragon processor handles Android apps and gaming smoothly, while the Intel chip delivers solid performance for Windows tasks with the capability to play some AAA titles at the lowest settings at either 1080p or 720p.

One area that might leave some wanting more is the pen experience. While functional on both systems, there’s noticeable latency, and using the pen on Windows can feel awkward since the display doesn’t lay flat. It’s not ideal for serious drawing or note-taking but works for basic tasks.

While many companies may never have a product like this leave their R&D lab, Lenovo likes to bring their concept ideas to market to see what sticks. It’s possible we may see a lower cost version of this in the future if they see some market interest.

But its high price tag make it more of a niche product. It’s a well-built machine, and if you’re looking for a device that blends Windows and Android as seamlessly as possible, the ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid delivers on that promise. But for most people, separate devices might still be the more affordable solution.

Disclosure: Lenovo provided this laptop on loan to the channel for this review but did not sponsor this video. They also did not review or approve this post or video before upload. All opinions are my own.

I flew a real plane and compared it to the Microsoft Flight Simulator experience

I recently embarked on my first flight lesson, something I’ve wanted to do for many years now. Having spent the better part of 30 years experiencing flight with PC based simulators, I was curious to see how close to the real thing sims can be.

See more in my latest video.

I remember my grandfather, who flew planes in World War II, telling me that to really experience flying you have to “feel it in your butt.” This advice stuck with me over the years, and when I took my first hands-on flying experience it became clear just how important feeling the plane and the air around it is for piloting it successfully.

I trained in a Piper Cherokee 140, which is known to be a good aircraft for beginners. My instructor handled the takeoff, but soon enough, I took control and was responsible for keeping the plane stable and maintaining altitude. Conditions were quite bumpy on this first flight, making it even more challenging. But this turbulence became a valuable part of the lesson, helping me to get accustomed to the controls and feeling how the air interacts with them.

What struck me most about the real flight was how different it felt compared to simulators. Despite decades of flying in virtual worlds, the physical input — how the air interacts with the plane — was something completely new. By the second half of the flight, I started to get more comfortable, even managing to land the plane successfully. My instructor said about 90% of the landing was my own doing! Unlike in the simulator, where I frequently veer off the runway, I managed to keep the real plane on the center line (or at least close enough to it).

One thing that simulators do get right is the visual aspect. I’ve been using the latest version of Microsoft Flight Simulator, and it was amazing to see how closely the simulated environment resembled the real world. Flying over Hartford, Connecticut in the simulator looked very much like the actual experience, from the city skyline to the water reflections. However, the feel of the controls in the real plane was another story. The simulator controls I’ve been using are not even a close representation of the real thing.. In fact I found flying the real plane easier than the simulator!

As I continue my flight training, I’m sure I’ll gain even more insights, and I look forward to sharing them with those interested in aviation. To that end I’ve started a new channel at https://lon.tv/flying where I’ll post diaries of my flight training progress. Right now there’s no content up there but I will be uploading soon. Subscribe so you don’t miss a thing!

Plex Releases New Photos App (sponsored post)

Plex just released a beta version of its standalone Photos app, which is a notable shift in how they plan to organize media on their platform. Previously, photos were accessible through the main Plex app alongside other media types like movies, TV shows, and music. You can see it in action in my latest video.

Now, Plex is pushing toward a new strategy where music and now photos has its own dedicated app. This approach mirrors their earlier release of Plexamp for music. Eventually both music and photos will be removed from the mainline Plex app.

The app is still in its early stages, but users can already download it on iOS or Android and connect it to their existing photo library on a Plex Media Server. Upon setup, the app brings up a minimalistic interface that offers basic features like viewing recently added photos, favoriting images, and accessing media from specific time periods. Videos can also be integrated into the photo library, making it easier to access all media types stored in the same place.

One key aspect of this app is the file structure on the server. The user can set up folders and subfolders that reflect directly within the app. Each folder in the file system shows up as an album with the ability to nest folders underneath. There’s also some options to filter images based on exif data stored in the image.

The app currently lacks an upload feature, so users can’t yet add new photos directly from their mobile devices, nor can they modify photo metadata, such as dates. However, they can add photos to their favorites list, which syncs back to the server.

The community’s feedback is actively being sought through this forum post that is being monitored by Plex developers.

It’s clear this initial release is more of a groundwork for future development, and Plex is positioning itself to make ongoing improvements. They’re also discussing adding an API layer to the Plex Media Server, which would allow external developers to create client applications for specific media types like audiobooks, offering more specialized experiences without needing the official app to support everything directly. You can read more about that here.

Disclosure: This is post was a paid sponsorship from Plex, but they did not review or approve this post or my video before it was uploaded.

Roll Your Own NAS? Healuck Intel N100 NAS / Mini PC Review

I recently got my hands on an intriguing little device from an unknown company called Healuck, designed for anyone looking to roll their own Network Attached Storage (NAS) system. The model I tested is powered by an Intel N100 mini PC and features two or four hot-swappable 3.5″ SATA hard drive bays. At first glance, it looks like a mini PC, but its design clearly positions it more as a DIY NAS solution.

You can see it in action in my latest review.

The unit I reviewed was the two-bay configuration, priced around $320, with 8GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD. If you need more storage, a four-bay version is available for about $100 more. Given the minor price difference, I’d likely go for the four-bay option to provide more flexibility with storage configurations. The internal components are fairly standard for an N100-based device. There’s only one slot for DDR5 RAM, and it comes with an NVMe drive as well. While it’s upgradeable, taking the unit apart is a bit tricky due to the design. The motherboard needs to be held in place as you reassemble the case, which doesn’t exactly inspire confidence.

The unit also features two 2.5-gigabit Ethernet ports, both of which performed well during testing, maintaining stable, symmetrical connections.

Setting up the unit is relatively simple. It comes with Open Media Vault (OMV), an open-source Linux-based NAS operating system, preinstalled on the NVME SSD. While it boots from the internal SSD, you’ll need to add your own storage drives for mainline storage.

I was impressed by the tool-less drive trays, which allow for easy hot-swapping without the need for screws. Once the drives are in place, configuring the system is straightforward via OMV’s web-based control panel. Although it’s basic, OMV provides essential NAS functionality like SMB and NFS file sharing, as well as user and folder management.

However, it’s worth noting that the device lacks hardware-based RAID, meaning that RAID management is handled by the operating system, which could result in a bit of CPU overhead.

I set up a Btrfs file system in a RAID 1 configuration for redundancy, similar to what you’d find on more expensive NAS systems. OMV doesn’t come with Plex pre-installed, and getting Plex to run requires setting up Docker first, which could be a bit of a hurdle for those unfamiliar with Linux and containers. Despite this, OMV is well-supported and regularly updated, which is reassuring. But other NAS operating systems like Unraid can be easily installed too. I even managed to boot up the desktop version of Ubuntu on the unit.

When it comes to power consumption, the device draws around 25 watts at idle with two drives spinning.

In terms of performance, the N100 processor holds up well, delivering consistent results comparable to other mini PCs with the same chip.

If you’re looking for something more reliable or mission-critical, I’d recommend considering a more established brand like Synology or QNAP. However, as an inexpensive media server, this could be a fun and functional project. The N100 chip, while modest, is powerful enough to handle basic NAS tasks.

I’m planning to test Unraid on it next to see how it handles Plex and other media server tasks. If you’re interested in a project PC that’s ready to go out of the box, this might be a worthwhile option to explore. I hope to start working on that in the next week or two. Stay tuned!

ATSC 3.0 Update: Did Broadcasters Mislead the FCC on LG Patent Suit Impact?

I’ve been closely following the transition of over-the-air television in the U.S. to the new ATSC 3.0 standard, also known as NextGenTV. Initially, the process appeared smooth, but things started to take a turn. Broadcasters began encrypting channels, making them inaccessible to viewers. Then, the industry was hit with a significant lawsuit that forced LG, one of the largest TV manufacturers, to pull its ATSC 3.0 tuners off the market.

In my latest video, we take a look at how the industry is responding to this lawsuit one year out. Broadcast industry association Pearl TV told the FCC last year that this lawsuit had no impact on the transition to ATSC 3.0, but they told a very different story to an appeals court hearing the case last week.

That lawsuit, filed by Constellation Designs, didn’t seek an astronomical sum—only $1.6 million in damages. But the real issue was the future costs: LG would have to pay a $6.75 royalty per unit for every television equipped with the tuner. This rate was about six times what they were paying to the patent pool for other related patents. LG, understandably, decided to exit the market rather than absorb those costs.

Fast forward to the present, and the broadcasters’ association, Pearl TV, has filed a brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals. They argue that the lawsuit could jeopardize the transition to ATSC 3.0. Their concern is that other patent holders, seeing the success of Constellation Designs, might also opt out of the patent pool, potentially leading to more lawsuits and higher costs for manufacturers. If that happens, they fear other TV manufacturers might follow LG’s lead and exit the market as well.

What’s interesting, though, is that Pearl TV’s message to the FCC last year was quite different. After the lawsuit, they downplayed the issue, saying everything was fine and there was no need for the FCC to intervene. They argued that the patent pools were functioning well and that there was no sign of market failure.

Despite Pearl’s reassurance to the FCC, the market tells a different story. Only a handful of new televisions this year included ATSC 3.0 tuners, and most are found only in high-end televisions that aren’t affordable for everyone. Panasonic’s recent announcement of their return to the U.S. market with TVs featuring ATSC 3.0 tuners adds some hope. However, those tuners won’t be activated until a future firmware update, and there’s no clear timeline for when that will happen.

The broader issue here seems to be that broadcasters are attempting to turn this new standard into a proprietary one. With ATSC 1.0, if a manufacturer’s product meets the FCC’s standards, they can build a tuner and sell it on the market. But under ATSC 3.0, manufacturers must get approval from broadcasters, pay for testing and certifications, and potentially face high royalty fees from DRM, which could make it financially unfeasible for many small hardware and software companies to participate.

The result is that consumers may end up paying more for television access, and options will remain limited – especially as the DRM encryption prevents the use of gateway devices that allow in-home streaming to televisions not connected to an antenna. This is particularly concerning given that broadcasters use public airwaves for free.

I’ve been encouraging viewers to make their voices heard with the FCC regarding these issues. Many have already submitted filings, and the ATSC 3.0 proceeding is now one of the FCC’s top concerns. It’s clear that public dissatisfaction with the transition is growing.

With a U.S. election coming up, followed by a presidential transition, this is a pivotal moment to influence how the FCC approaches the ATSC 3.0 standard. There’s an opportunity to ensure that the new standard benefits consumers, not just broadcasters. The more public feedback that can be submitted now, the better the chances of ensuring a fair and accessible transition.

Tech Dispatch from Germany!

I spent this past week in Germany attending some events ahead of the IFA consumer electronics trade show. IFA is the European equivalent to CES here in the United States. Lenovo sponsored this trip, covering my travel expenses. No additional compensation was received.

See my latest dispatch video from the show here!

My report consists of things I found of interest at two press events – one sponsored by Showstoppers that showcased products from 80 different companies, and a press event Lenovo held at a very cool industrial venue called Kraftwerks.

Showstoppers had a few cool gadgets on display, including some neat mechanical keyboards from Epomaker, a monstrous looking modular yard maintenance device called the “Yarbo,” and a bunch of other cool gadgets.

Pre-pandemic, IFA was always Lenovo’s huge showcase event. This year was the first time since the pandemic that Lenovo pulled out all the stops for a major IFA presentation. You can see just how extensive the presentation was in my dispatch video.

Lenovo’s presentation did not have any groundbreaking new product announcements, with the exception of a concept PC featuring a lid that automatically opens and tracks the user’s movements. But they did show off some nice PCs including a number of sub $1,000 ARM windows machines running with Snapdragon X Plus processors.

What was interesting was the fact that Intel is no longer the dominant chip platform for PCs – there was equal billing given to AMD and Qualcomm both in the keynote presentation and in product announcements. All three chipmakers now have PCs compatible with the Microsoft Co-Pilot+ AI specification that allows for on-device AI processing.

I was unable to stay for the rest of the IFA show due to the costs I would incur for full coverage. But hopefully this dispatch gives you a taste of what tech companies will be marketing to European users in the months ahead.

If you liked the style of this video I have hours more of it! See my dispatches playlist for coverage of CES, other regional product showcases and more! If you’re curious about what I use to cover these events I’m now using just my iPhone with a Sennheiser AVX microphone attached. You can see my set up in this video.

My next dispatch will likely be at the end of October for Pepcom’s holiday preview show in New York City. Stay tuned!

8bitDo Pro 2 Hall Effect Stick Game Controller Review

The 8bitdo Pro 2 has long been my favorite game controller, and now with the introduction of hall effect analog sticks, it has seen a notable upgrade. You can see it in action in my latest review.

Unlike its predecessor, which used Alps-based potentiometers, the hall effect sticks rely on magnetic sensors. This results in a smoother, more precise control with reduced chances of stick drift over time. While the rest of the controller remains largely the same, this improvement is a nice step forward for those looking for durability and accuracy in gameplay.

The hall effect sticks provide a high degree of sensitivity and precision, with very little dead zone by default. This is a step up from the older model, which often experienced stick drift after prolonged use. The vibration motors remain strong, and the d-pad, a staple of the 8bitdo Pro series, continues to impress, especially for retro gaming enthusiasts.

The price point remains around $50, with several color options available, including crystal blue, green, & purple, along with more retro styles like a Game Boy color scheme. Its design remains faithful to the original, featuring a PlayStation-style layout that many users have come to appreciate. A standout feature is its wide compatibility, supporting platforms such as PCs, the Nintendo Switch, Steam Deck, iOS and ChromeOS. It unfortunately lacks support for PlayStation and Xbox consoles. Its motion controls work well with titles like Mario Odyssey.

One of the controller’s strengths is its configurability. Through 8bitdo’s Ultimate Software, users can remap buttons, set macros, and adjust the sensitivity of both the sticks and triggers.

The controller offers versatility in power options, supporting both an included removable rechargeable battery and standard AA batteries. While Bluetooth is the primary wireless connection, users who prefer a more stable and lower-latency experience may opt to connect via USB.

In terms of gameplay, the hall effect sticks feel smoother and more consistent compared to the older Alps-based sticks. This improvement may seem subtle, but for gamers familiar with the older Pro 2 model, it is a noticeable and welcome improvement. The original was not bad by any means but this just feels better.

Overall, the 8bitdo Pro 2 with hall effect sticks feels like a refined version of an already excellent controller. The improvements in stick precision and durability, combined with its continued versatility, make it a solid recommendation for anyone in need of a high-quality gaming controller. While the changes may not seem drastic at first glance, I would recommend buyers seek out the hall effect version for the best results.

Disclaimer: 8bitdo provided the controller free of charge. However they did not review or approve this content before it was uploaded.

Apple Skirts New EU Requirements on Replaceable Batteries

Apple recently sent out invitations for an event on September 9th, likely to announce the iPhone 16. This announcement has sparked discussions on social media about the battery longevity of current iPhones along with dashed hopes of user replaceable batteries. We take a deeper dive in my latest video.

After a year of use, my iPhone 15 Pro Max’s battery capacity has decreased by about 8%, with 278 charging cycles logged. While I’ve noticed a reduction in overall battery life from when I first purchased the phone, it is doing slightly better than where my iPhone 14 Pro was at a year ago. This might be due to the iPhone 14 Pro having a smaller battery and thus more charging cycles. Either way I’m well within the stated performance expectations for Apple’s iPhone batteries.

Apple claims that the iPhone 15 models are designed to retain 80% of their original capacity after 1,000 complete charge cycles, a step up from the 500 cycle claim for the iPhone 14 and earlier models.

This improvement seems to align with a new European Union regulation that mandates user-replaceable batteries, but with a significant loophole if batteries can maintain, you guessed it, 80% capacity after 1,000 charge cycles. If a device can maintain at least 80% capacity after 1,000 full charge cycles and is waterproof, it is exempt from the regulation, meaning Apple can continue producing phones with non-user-replaceable batteries. One might argue that Apple engineered to the spec, or perhaps Apple’s lobbyists helped engineer a law that meets their hardware performance levels.

Apple provides guidelines on maximizing battery lifespan, emphasizing the importance of keeping your phone cool, especially during charging. They recommend avoiding exposure to temperatures above 95°F (35°C), which can permanently damage battery capacity. Many of us, myself included, charge our phones wirelessly or use fast chargers, both of which generate heat and contribute to battery degradation. Apple also suggests that phone cases can trap heat, further accelerating battery wear.

For those considering battery replacement, Apple offers the service for $100, but there’s a catch. If your phone has any other damage, such as a cracked screen, Apple will require you to fix that first, potentially turning a $100 battery replacement into a much more expensive repair. While it’s possible to replace the battery yourself using a guide from iFixit, the process is complicated and requires specialized tools.

Anecdotally, based on comments I’ve seen, it seems people who avoid fully charging their phones every time and opt for slower wired chargers might experience better battery longevity than those of us who use faster, heat-generating charging options.

Plex Pass New Quality of Life Features (sponsored post)

For this month’s sponsored Plex video we take a look at a few several minor yet useful features for its Plex Pass subscribers that might enhance the overall user experience. While these features may not seem groundbreaking, they can offer a more tailored and convenient viewing experience. Take a look in my latest video.

One of the new features, “Rewind on Resume,” is designed for those moments when you’re interrupted mid-viewing. Instead of resuming exactly where you left off, this feature allows the video to rewind a specified number of seconds, helping you remember what was happening before you paused. This could be particularly useful for those who, like many of us, find themselves frequently interrupted by daily life.

Another feature adds player controls for the “Skip Intro” and “Skip Credits” options that were previously only set at the server level. Users can choose to have intros and credits skipped automatically, manually, or not at all, depending on their preference. This is especially convenient for binge-watchers who want to skip past the end credits of a concluding episode and the intro credits on the subsequent one.

For those who utilize Plex’s DVR feature, there’s an option to automatically skip commercials during playback. However, this only applies to content recorded via the DVR and not to manually added other content. This feature, like the skip intro and credits options, can be customized to the user’s preference, allowing for automatic skipping or manual control.

Of note – the skip features are not yet available on every Plex player. Unfortunately Apple devices do not have these player-level controls at the time of this post.

Another little feature will provide some help for those of us who often fall asleep in front of the TV. Called the “Passout Protection” feature, this setting allows the user to set a time limit after which the playback will stop. This can be set for one to three hours, with a prompt asking if you’re still watching before the playback stops. Alternatively, this prompt can be disabled for those who prefer uninterrupted viewing.

Lastly, Plex has enhanced its music player, Plexamp, with a feature called “Mix Builder.” This allows users to create playlists based on selected artists or albums. Unlike some other Plexamp features that can take you on a musical journey, this feature lets users curate their own listening experience by locking the playlist onto specific artists or albums.

While these features may not revolutionize your Plex experience, they do offer small improvements that can make using the service more enjoyable. For those with a Plex Pass and compatible devices, exploring these options might reveal some valuable enhancements to your media consumption habits.

Disclaimer: This post & video was sponsored by Plex but they did not review or approve the content before it was posted.