Tag: networking

Unifi U7 Lite Review: $99 Wi-Fi 7 Access Point Breaks the Gigabit Barrier

I’ve been gradually upgrading the Wi-Fi setup in my house, and the latest step in that process is beginning to swap out my UniFi Wi-Fi 6 access points for the new Wi-Fi 7 models. This first step was installing the new U7 Lite, their entry-level Wi-Fi 7 device priced at $99 (compensated affiliate link).

You can see it in action in my latest video.

I started with the one in my studio since this is where I’ll likely have the most Wi-Fi 7 clients to experiment with. It’s a good test case for seeing how much of a real-world bump I can get from upgrading to Wi-Fi 7.

Physically, the U7 Lite is nearly identical to previous “Lite” models from UniFi. It uses the same mounting bracket as the AC Lite and U6 Lite, which made installation a 30-second job—twist out the old one, twist in the new one, and that was it. It requires PoE (Power over Ethernet), and I’m powering it through the UniFi Flex 2.5 PoE switch I reviewed recently. The U7 Lite, like the prior model, doesn’t include a PoE injector.

Specs-wise, the U7 Lite is a 2×2 access point for 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz only—it doesn’t include 6 GHz support. For my environment, which is a rural home with minimal RF interference and modest usage, that’s fine. The jump to 2.5 Gbps Ethernet from the 1 Gbps found on older units opens up some potential bandwidth gains, and I was curious to see just how much improvement I’d get on my Wi-Fi 7 devices.

Before upgrading, I ran some benchmarks using an iPhone 16 Pro Max connected to my U6 Lite prior to its decommissioning. Downstream speeds hovered just under 500 Mbps, and upstream was a bit better, close to 600 Mbps. Those were solid numbers for a mid-range access point, and I saw similar results on my Windows PC as well.

Once the U7 Lite was installed and adopted by the UniFi Controller, I didn’t change any settings initially—just let it run with the defaults to see if the upgrade alone made a difference. And it did. Download speeds immediately jumped to around 700 Mbps. Upload stayed in the same ballpark as before, but the increased downstream bandwidth was a good early sign.

Next, I tried enabling a wider channel width. The U7 Lite allows up to 240 MHz, but that depends on client compatibility and has the potential for channel overlap and interference with other access points. I set it to 240 just to see what would happen, and my iPhone connected at 160 MHz—likely its hardware limit. Still, that change alone brought my download speeds right up to a gigabit, with upload seeing an improvement as well.

Then I tested out Multi-Link Operation (MLO), a new feature in Wi-Fi 7 that allows simultaneous connections across multiple frequency bands—in this case, 2.4 and 5 GHz. I created a new SSID and enabled MLO in the UniFi Controller, but the results weren’t impressive. Downloads dropped a bit compared to the single 160 MHz channel, and upload didn’t see much change either. Latency was slightly worse as well, with occasional packet drops during ping tests. For now, MLO seems like a feature that still needs some maturing—both in terms of firmware and client device support.

When I reverted back to the standard 160 MHz Wi-Fi 7 configuration, latency improved and speeds returned to peak levels. I’ll continue to keep an eye on MLO as I bring in new test devices with stronger radios, but it’s not quite ready for prime time in my setup.

The takeaway so far is that Wi-Fi 7, even on an entry-level access point like the U7 Lite, can deliver meaningful performance gains—especially on the downstream side. It’s a simple, affordable upgrade that integrates easily into existing UniFi networks. I’ll likely pick up another, more robust unit for my upstairs area where traffic is heavier and keep testing from there. As always, more to come!

Disclosure: I purchased the U7 Lite myself. The router I’m using, the UniFi Dream Machine Pro, was sent to the channel five years ago, but all opinions are mine and the video was not sponsored or pre-reviewed.

Unifi Flex 2.5 POE – Power over Ethernet Switch Review

I’ve been running my home network on UniFi gear for over five years now, starting around the time I got a 10 gigabit symmetrical internet connection. I installed a UniFi Dream Machine Pro (compensated affiliate link) and built out a network using their access points and a few switches. Recently, I added a new component to the mix: the Flex 2.5GP PoE switch. That new switch is the subject of my latest video review.

This Flex 2.5 POE is designed more for home prosumers than for rack-mounted enterprise setups. But it will integrate into a business environment just the same. It supports 2.5 gigabit per second speeds across all its Ethernet ports and delivers power over Ethernet (PoE) to connected devices on each. It has an uplink port that supports either an SFP+ or a 10-gigabit RJ45 connection. I opted to uplink it to my 10-gig network backbone using a direct-attached copper SFP+ cable (compensated affiliate link) to my backbone switch.

The switch sells for a reasonable $199 (compensated affiliate link) but has one huge caveat: it doesn’t include a power supply! That cost me another $80 + shipping as I didn’t read the fine print prior to making the initial purchase. The Flex 2.5 POE can use power over ethernet to power itself, but using POE as the input limits the overall power budget—only about 16 watts in my case—while the external power supply gives you up to 196 watts in total with full POE++ wattage for each port on the output. A PoE++ input allows for a 46 watt power budget, and a PoE+++ input allows for 76 watts.

I picked up the Flex 2.5 POE mainly because I’m upgrading to Unifi’s Wi-Fi 7 access points, which now have 2.5 gigabit Ethernet ports. My older UniFi PoE switch only supports gigabit, so this new one gives me faster connectivity and power to those access points. It’s also useful for powering some of my video gear, which relies on PoE.

Hardware-wise, the switch feels solid but lacks the industrial sturdiness of their rack mounted gear. It’s fanless, so it runs quiet but gets a bit warm. It has rubber feet for desktop use and a wall mount option. You can only use one uplink port at a time—either the RJ45 or the SFP+—and only the RJ45 supports PoE in. It is possible to power over the RJ45 while using the SFP+ for data.

Setup was as seamless as usual with UniFi gear. As soon as I connected it, my network detected it, and I was able to adopt it from the web control panel. The firmware updated automatically, and then it was ready to go.

Testing it out, I ran a 2.5 gigabit Ethernet adapter from my PC and confirmed I was getting full speeds on both download and upload. At the same time, I was sending an NDI video stream upstream to my video production system, which added more bandwidth use beyond the 2.5 gigabit baseline. Everything performed as expected.

In the UniFi control panel, I could see real-time power usage across each port. I plugged in four PoE devices and was still using only about 27 watts out of the 196-watt power budget. As this is a managed switch you have full access to all of the configuration options that Unifi offers on their other switches on a per-port level.

What this switch offers is a nearly ideal mix of features for my needs: solid power support, 2.5 gig speeds, and tight integration with the UniFi ecosystem. I would have liked to see at least one more 10 gig port onboard, and it’s frustrating that the power supply wasn’t included. But otherwise, it fills a long-standing gap in UniFi’s product line. For now, it’s found a home in my network closet—and it looks like it’s going to stay there.

Review of the New Asus ZenMesh Wi-Fi 7 Mesh System

Wi-Fi 7 is starting to appear on more consumer devices, and ASUS now has several routers and mesh systems on the market that support the new standard. In my latest video, I tested a few of their offerings, including a high-end indoor model (BT10), a mid-range option (BT8), a low-end unit (BD5), and their BD5 outdoor access point that’s weatherproof.

These are all part of ASUS’s AiMesh / Zenwifi system, meaning they can work together in a mesh configuration to extend coverage throughout the home. You can find all of the devices I featured here on Amazon (compensated affiliate link).

Setting these up was pretty straightforward. I started with the BT10 as the primary router in the basement and connected the others around the house. For larger homes, ASUS recommends three access points. Smaller homes might get by with two, and you can mix and match models. Placement is important if you’re using wireless backhaul—each device needs to overlap with the next to maintain connectivity. For the best performance, though, wired backhaul is the way to go. If your home is already wired with Ethernet, that’s ideal. If not, MoCA adapters can use existing coaxial cable for a wired-like connection.

The difference in performance between the models is noticeable. The BT10 supports three bands (2.4, 5, and 6 GHz) and uses a 4×4 radio configuration. In my tests, wireless backhaul between two BT10 units positioned across the house (and a few floors up) from each other hit an average of 727 Mbps, peaking near 1 Gbps. Meanwhile, the lower-end BD5, which has just a dual-band 2×2 setup, only managed about 265 Mbps over the same wireless link.

For homes with fast internet connections—especially over 2.5 Gbps—the BT10 is a better fit, since it includes 10 Gb Ethernet ports. The BT8 and BD5 top out at 2.5 Gb. During testing, I was able to achieve full throughput on a 10 Gb connection using the BT10’s routing features, so it’s definitely capable of handling modern broadband speeds.

Wi-Fi 7 performance on client devices was also solid, though I was limited by the 2×2 radios in my iPhone 16 Pro Max and ASUS laptop. Even so, I saw speeds over 1.4 Gbps down and 1.6 Gbps up while in the same room as the access point, which is impressive for wireless. Performance does drop off the further you get away from the access point, however.

The outdoor unit shares specs with the BD5 but adds weatherproofing and Power over Ethernet (PoE) support, which simplifies installation. I powered it with a PoE injector and was able to cover my entire acre of backyard without any issues. Setup was quick using the ASUS app, which walked me through the entire process in about 20 minutes to start, and just a few minutes for adding additional mesh units.

The app also offers some useful features, like creating isolated networks for IoT devices and setting up child-safe profiles with content filters and bandwidth limits. There’s also a traditional web interface that’s familiar to anyone who’s used ASUS routers before, although it hasn’t changed much in over a decade.

Overall, the BT8 and BT10 models deliver strong performance, especially when hardwired. Even the low-end model performs well if you avoid relying solely on wireless mesh. The biggest drawback is the limited number of Ethernet ports on the base units, so a network switch may be necessary for wired backhaul setups. The outdoor unit is a nice addition, though I would have preferred a longer AC power cable in the box for those that don’t want to go with a PoE solution.

These ASUS mesh routers aren’t cheap, and pricing can fluctuate due to tariff issues—even on products made in Taiwan or Vietnam. Still, for those looking for high-end Wi-Fi 7 gear, they offer solid performance and flexibility.

Disclosure: Asus provided these units free of charge. No other compensation was received and they did not review or approve my video or this post before they were published. All opinions are my own.

Unifi 10 Gig USB 4 Ethernet Adapter Review

Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been checking out some of the new USB 4.0 10-gigabit Ethernet adapters that have hit the market. In my latest review, we take a look at one from Unifi – known more for their network infrastructure equipment vs. individual adapter cards.

At $200, it sits a bit higher on the price scale compared to others, but this one stands out because it doesn’t have a noisy fan. The outer case gets a bit warm but I noticed no performance degradation under sustained loads.

This adapter is running with the same Marvell AQC113 chipset as some of the others we’ve reviewed recently. Setup was simple. On macOS, Linux (Ubuntu), and Windows, the adapter functioned as plug-and-play in my testing. UniFi also provides a direct link to Marvel’s driver download page for those who need additional support. That’s a refreshing change from some of the vendors I’ve seen who push downloads through sketchy sites.

Performance was consistent across the board. I ran speed tests on all three platforms—Mac, Windows, and Linux—and consistently saw results in the 9.4 to 9.47 Gbps range in both upload and download directions using iPerf. The adapter maintained those speeds reliably with minimal variation.

To get the full performance you will need to connect this to a USB 4 or Thunderbolt connection. In addition to 10 gigabit speeds it will also operate at 5, 2.5, 1 gigabits or 100 megabits. I’m sure it’ll probably support 10 megabits too if you happen to plug it into a 90s era hub.

Overall this one feels like a solid option for anyone looking to get reliable 10 gig connectivity and something I’m comfortable recommending.

Plugable 5G USB-C Ethernet Adapter Review – USBC-E5000

My latest video review is of the Plugable USBC-E5000 5 gigabit ethernet adapter —something that’s still relatively uncommon compared to the more widely available 2.5 gigabit options. The unit supports 5 Gbps speeds when plugged into a 10 Gbps USB 3.2 port, meaning you don’t need Thunderbolt or USB 4 to hit those higher transfer rates. You can see it in action here.

You can find these on Amazon at a pretty reasonable price (compensated affiliate link). Be sure to look for coupon options that might be available.

It’s powered by the Realtek RTL8157 chipset, which made setup a smooth process on macOS and Linux. Windows was a bit different. It recognized the device without needing a manual driver install, but initial download speeds didn’t meet expectations. Installing the drivers directly from Plugable’s site resolved that issue. I’d expect Windows to eventually update with better out-of-the-box support.

That chipset choice makes a difference. A few years back, I tried similar 5 gig adapters using less reliable chipsets, and the experience wasn’t great. This one worked consistently across all three major operating systems. It also worked with a few of my smartphones, although I found performance better on iOS vs. Android.

It’s worth noting that while this is a 5 Gbps adapter, it also scales down to 2.5 Gbps, 1 Gbps, and even 100 Mbps depending on the network switch it’s connected to. However, to get the full 5 Gbps performance, the USB port has to support 10 Gbps throughput. Plug it into a slower port, and you won’t get top speeds.

Once I had it connected to my Mac, I ran a speed test using my 10 Gbps internet connection. The results were in line with what I expected from a 5 gigabit connection—downloads and uploads both performed well, taking into account the usual network overhead. I saw similar performance on my Windows and Linux machines.

There’s not much else to the product. It does what it says. It’s compact, has indicator lights for link status, and so far it’s been reliable. Plugable is also a U.S.-based company with domestic support, which might be a consideration for those who like knowing there’s someone they can reach out to if anything goes wrong. Most of their products, including this one, come with a two year warranty.

If you’re looking to move beyond 2.5 Gbps over USB and want a relatively straightforward upgrade, this might be something to keep on your radar.