The FCC’s Media Bureau put out a notice on September 2nd (DA 25-789) about the ongoing transition to ATSC 3.0, also known as NextGenTV. There really isn’t anything new in this order that wasn’t already in place from 2017 when ATSC 3.0 broadcasts first began.
One of the key points is around the requirement that full-power and Class A stations continue to provide their main channel in the current ATSC 1.0 format if they switch their primary signal over to ATSC 3.0. This is meant to protect viewers who don’t yet have compatible equipment.
The rules allow an application to be processed on an expedited basis if a station keeps at least 95 percent of its existing audience covered with an ATSC 1.0 simulcast. What the Bureau clarified is that it will continue to use detailed terrain-based coverage analysis to determine whether that 95 percent threshold is met.
For stations that can’t quite hit that 95 percent mark, the notice emphasizes that their applications won’t be ignored. The Bureau says it will still review them on a case-by-case basis, weighing factors such as whether viewers in the “loss area” are still served by another station carrying the same network, or whether the station offers mitigation like providing converter boxes.
The Bureau also highlighted some of the flexibility already built into the rules. Stations are only required to simulcast their main channel in ATSC 1.0, not additional sub-channels. The “substantially similar” programming requirement applies only to that main stream, which gives broadcasters room to experiment with new ATSC 3.0 features such as interactive services or higher-resolution video. Stations can also partner with more than one host station to meet the 95 percent coverage goal. Low-power and translator stations aren’t required to simulcast at all, though they can volunteer to host other stations’ signals.
It’s important to note that this notice doesn’t create new obligations or change the simulcast rules. Instead, it’s meant to give broadcasters more certainty about how the FCC staff will interpret and process applications. In other words, this is more about guidance and reassurance than a firm new policy.
Look for a draft order that will more specifically spell out the rules for the cutover – including whether or not DRM will be allowed. Stay tuned!























