Tag: review

Frontier Fiber 2 Years Later

I first reviewed Frontier’s Optic Service here in Connecticut two years ago when my Dad had the 500/500 service installed. My mother had the service installed at her place a year later. Recently, I received a lot of comments asking how well the service is holding up. For the most part, it’s been stable, but there are a few key things to watch out for, especially when it comes to billing.

You can find out more in my latest video.

The service itself has been great in terms of bandwidth and reliability, even in challenging areas like my father’s home near the beach, where salty air causes corrosion on traditional coax wires and connectors. Compared to cable services, which often needed repair due to corroded connectors, Frontier’s fiber optic technology has been much more reliable for him.

However, it’s not all good news, particularly when it comes to customer support and billing. When my mom signed up, she encountered multiple issues. Her initial service order was botched, resulting in two accounts being set up, and it took several rounds of customer service calls to sort out.

After a year of service, her bill began to creep up. Initially, her service package cost around $150 per month, but as promotions ended and prices increased, she found herself paying $300 more annually, with no change in the level of service. By mid-2024, her bill had risen to nearly $176, mainly due to increases in the base price for the Internet service, the expiration of promotional discounts for YouTube TV, and a reduction in the autopay discount.

Frontier’s online tools for managing the account were less than helpful. When I attempted to change her service plan, their website crashed. Despite the challenges, it may be worthwhile to switch her to Frontier’s newer, more affordable 200 Mbps symmetrical plan, which didn’t exist when she first signed up.

Frontier now offers higher-end packages with speeds of up to 7 gigabits per second across most of their fiber service area. But, as impressive as that may sound, it’s not necessarily practical, since most online services usually top out at around 2 gigs. Also of note, Comcast’s Gigabit Pro costs about the same as the 7 gig plan with a more robust metro ethernet connection.

Frontier may soon be acquired by Verizon in a $20 billion deal. If the acquisition goes through, it would mark an ironic turn of events, as Verizon had previously sold off its copper landline assets and pole attachments to Frontier.

The deal still requires shareholder and regulatory approval, and there are concerns within the financial community about whether it will benefit Verizon. In the meantime, Frontier customers should keep an eye on their bills. While the service itself is reliable, navigating customer support and billing issues will sadly be an ongoing challenge.

Beelink SEi14 Core Ultra 5 Mini PC Review

The Beelink SEi14 is positioned as a high-end Mini PC with solid performance and notable upgradeability. You can see more in my latest review!

Powered by the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H processor, this device comes with a price tag of $679, although the initial list price is $799, with a coupon currently offering a $120 discount. It’s equipped with 32 GB of DDR5 dual channel memory, upgradeable to 96 GB, and features a 1TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD, with a 4.0 NVME second slot available for additional storage.

The build quality of the SEi14 looks and feels nice with its aluminum case, a design seemingly inspired by Apple, though the back and bottom are plastic. It doesn’t come with a VESA mount, making it more of a desktop unit.

In terms of connectivity, the SEi14 provides a wide array of ports, including USB Type-C, USB-A, and dual-display output via HDMI and DisplayPort, supporting 4K at 60Hz. It also includes a Thunderbolt 4 port in the pack, capable of handling external GPUs and fast storage. Its ethernet port runs at 2.5 Gbps, but unlike other Mini PCs with two, this one only has a single ethernet port.

The system is quiet even under heavy load. Power consumption, however, hovers around 32 watts at idle which is a bit higher than some of the other Mini PCs we’ve looked at lately. It’ll run at 86 watts under heavy load. The 3DMark Timespy stress test reported that the system can maintain stable performance over time, even when under heavy load.

When it comes to real-world performance, the SEi14 performed adequately across a range of tasks. Web browsing is fast, and it handled 4K 60fps video playback without issues. On the gaming front, it managed to play titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 and No Man’s Sky at 1080p with frame rates around 45-50 frames per second, albeit on the lowest settings. Benchmark tests indicated its performance is consistent with expectations for devices equipped with this Intel Core Ultra processor.

For creators, basic video editing tasks are feasible, and while professional-level 3D rendering or color grading would require external GPU support, everyday editing tasks should be manageable on this machine.

For users preferring Linux, Ubuntu ran with few issues, though the system’s Intel-based Wi-Fi adapter wasn’t immediately recognized, a problem likely solvable with future driver updates. Wired Ethernet worked as expected, and overall performance was smooth.

The SEi14 is a well-rounded, premium Mini PC for those who require more from a compact form factor. Its price might be higher than some alternatives, but its combination of upgradeability, performance, and quiet operation makes it an option worth considering for those in need of a reliable, versatile Mini PC.

Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid Review – Windows and Android Laptop / Tablet

I recently got my hands on a device that stands out for its unconventional approach: the Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid. At first glance, it looks like your average Lenovo laptop, but there’s a twist. The screen detaches, transforming that portion of the device into an Android tablet while Windows still runs on the keyboard deck.

You can see it in action in my latest review.

This hybrid setup is well executed, although it comes with a hefty price tag of around $3,500. For that, you get the laptop, the detachable 14-inch 2.8K OLED touch display, a pen, and a stand. While the package is convenient, it’s worth noting that you could buy separate devices for less, but Lenovo seems to be betting on the appeal of having everything in one.

On the Windows side, the laptop is powered by a Core Ultra 7 155H processor, 32GB of RAM, and a 1TB SSD. The Android tablet features a Snapdragon 8+ processor, 12GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. The device weighs in at around 3.87 pounds, heavier than other laptops, but considering it doubles as both a laptop and a tablet, it’s understandable.

Both systems run simultaneously, so pulling the screen off the keyboard deck will immediately switch the tablet display from Windows to Android. Windows will continue to run on the keyboard deck but a display will need to be connected to the keyboard deck in order for user interaction.

It’s also possible to switch between Windows and Android when the display is attached with a specialized key on the keyboard. When the key is pressed Windows continues to run but the keyboard, trackpad, webcam and pen all connect to Android.

One of the more unique features of the Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid is its “hybrid stream” functionality. This allows you to stream the Android tablet’s screen directly to the Windows side. Essentially, you can control the Android interface within a window on the Windows desktop, allowing for a fluid experience when switching between tasks. It’s a handy way to interact with Android apps without having to physically switch back and forth between the two systems. However, the reverse isn’t possible—you can’t control the Windows side from Android. While the stream works smoothly, there’s some minor lag, especially noticeable when using the touch display.

Another cross-system feature is the built-in file syncing between the two operating systems. Lenovo has included a shared folder, which appears as an “A:\” drive on the Windows side. This feature allows you to sync files between the Android and Windows systems. For example, if you save a file in the shared folder, it becomes accessible on both the Windows desktop and the Android tablet. This syncing isn’t live, so you’ll need to ensure you’re not editing the same file on both systems simultaneously to avoid conflicts. It’s not the most seamless integration, but it provides a functional way to share files across the two platforms when working between Android and Windows.

As far as battery life goes, you can get up to 20 hours of use if you switch between operating systems strategically. The Windows component does have a nice large 75wh battery which should get through most of a workday on its own.

Gaming and video editing are possible on both Windows and Android, though the hardware limitations might affect more demanding tasks. The Snapdragon processor handles Android apps and gaming smoothly, while the Intel chip delivers solid performance for Windows tasks with the capability to play some AAA titles at the lowest settings at either 1080p or 720p.

One area that might leave some wanting more is the pen experience. While functional on both systems, there’s noticeable latency, and using the pen on Windows can feel awkward since the display doesn’t lay flat. It’s not ideal for serious drawing or note-taking but works for basic tasks.

While many companies may never have a product like this leave their R&D lab, Lenovo likes to bring their concept ideas to market to see what sticks. It’s possible we may see a lower cost version of this in the future if they see some market interest.

But its high price tag make it more of a niche product. It’s a well-built machine, and if you’re looking for a device that blends Windows and Android as seamlessly as possible, the ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid delivers on that promise. But for most people, separate devices might still be the more affordable solution.

Disclosure: Lenovo provided this laptop on loan to the channel for this review but did not sponsor this video. They also did not review or approve this post or video before upload. All opinions are my own.

8bitDo Pro 2 Hall Effect Stick Game Controller Review

The 8bitdo Pro 2 has long been my favorite game controller, and now with the introduction of hall effect analog sticks, it has seen a notable upgrade. You can see it in action in my latest review.

Unlike its predecessor, which used Alps-based potentiometers, the hall effect sticks rely on magnetic sensors. This results in a smoother, more precise control with reduced chances of stick drift over time. While the rest of the controller remains largely the same, this improvement is a nice step forward for those looking for durability and accuracy in gameplay.

The hall effect sticks provide a high degree of sensitivity and precision, with very little dead zone by default. This is a step up from the older model, which often experienced stick drift after prolonged use. The vibration motors remain strong, and the d-pad, a staple of the 8bitdo Pro series, continues to impress, especially for retro gaming enthusiasts.

The price point remains around $50, with several color options available, including crystal blue, green, & purple, along with more retro styles like a Game Boy color scheme. Its design remains faithful to the original, featuring a PlayStation-style layout that many users have come to appreciate. A standout feature is its wide compatibility, supporting platforms such as PCs, the Nintendo Switch, Steam Deck, iOS and ChromeOS. It unfortunately lacks support for PlayStation and Xbox consoles. Its motion controls work well with titles like Mario Odyssey.

One of the controller’s strengths is its configurability. Through 8bitdo’s Ultimate Software, users can remap buttons, set macros, and adjust the sensitivity of both the sticks and triggers.

The controller offers versatility in power options, supporting both an included removable rechargeable battery and standard AA batteries. While Bluetooth is the primary wireless connection, users who prefer a more stable and lower-latency experience may opt to connect via USB.

In terms of gameplay, the hall effect sticks feel smoother and more consistent compared to the older Alps-based sticks. This improvement may seem subtle, but for gamers familiar with the older Pro 2 model, it is a noticeable and welcome improvement. The original was not bad by any means but this just feels better.

Overall, the 8bitdo Pro 2 with hall effect sticks feels like a refined version of an already excellent controller. The improvements in stick precision and durability, combined with its continued versatility, make it a solid recommendation for anyone in need of a high-quality gaming controller. While the changes may not seem drastic at first glance, I would recommend buyers seek out the hall effect version for the best results.

Disclaimer: 8bitdo provided the controller free of charge. However they did not review or approve this content before it was uploaded.

Boox 7 Go Color E-ink Reader Review

I recently had the opportunity to test out the Boox 7 Go Color E-Ink Android E-Reader, a device that promises to bring the benefits of E-Ink technology to a color display. You can check it out in my latest review.

This e-reader is part of the Boox lineup, which includes other devices like the Boox Palma, a smaller, phone-sized e-reader. Both devices run Android and allow just about any Android app to run (although some work better than others on the -eink display). However, the Boox 7 Go Color distinguishes itself by offering a larger, seven-inch color E-Ink display.

At a price point of $249 (compensated affiliate link), this device is slightly more affordable than the Boox Palma. The display itself is what sets this e-reader apart—while it is in color, it operates using E-Ink technology, meaning the screen only updates when something changes on it. This design is ideal for reading and other activities that don’t require frequent screen updates which greatly extends batter life. However, the trade-off is a display that is less responsive, less vibrant and dimmer than the typical smartphone or tablet screen. Users will likely find themselves relying on the sidelight, which can be adjusted for color temperature to reduce blue light exposure at night.

The resolution of the display is 1680 by 1264 pixels, with a density of 300 DPI for black-and-white content and 150 DPI for color. The color is comparable to the color quality of a printed newspaper.

One drawback of the color E-Ink display is the noticeable ghosting that occurs when scrolling or interacting with the screen. This issue is less pronounced on black-and-white E-Ink displays but is quite evident here and the display will update more frequently as a result. However, the upside is exceptional battery life, which can be measured in days rather than hours, depending on usage. Reading consumes minimal power, but running Android apps, especially those requiring background processes, might drain the battery more quickly. The device also includes some clever power management features, such as shutting down completely after a few minutes of inactivity to preserve battery life and disabling apps from running in the background.

In terms of hardware, the device is lightweight, weighing just under seven ounces, and features a USB Type-C port for charging, a microSD card slot for additional storage, and front-facing buttons that can be reprogrammed for different functions. The device also supports Bluetooth, allowing users to connect headphones for audio playback, although the built-in speaker is adequate for audiobooks or podcasts.

Running on Android 12, the Boox 7 Go Color comes with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage. However, security is a concern. The device does not require a password by default, even after a Google account is linked, and while a password can be set up, entering it on the somewhat laggy touch screen can be cumbersome.

The reading experience on the Boox 7 Go Color is solid for text-based content, although the backlight is necessary for comfortable reading due to the dim nature of the screen. The color display allows for viewing graphic novels or color PDFs, albeit with lower resolution and less vibrant colors compared to traditional screens. For games, only simple word or puzzle games like Wordle are suitable, as the display struggles with anything requiring animation or quick response times.

The device also offers good PDF support, with a simple method for transferring files via Wi-Fi using the built-in Boox Drop app, which spins up a web server that runs on device and is accessible on the local network. This feature is easy to use but again raises security concerns due to the lack of password protection. Despite these concerns, large PDF files load relatively quickly and are easily navigable, making the Boox 7 Go Color a competent device for those needing a color E-Ink reader for document viewing.

Overall, while the Boox 7 Go Color E-Ink reader has its flaws, particularly in terms of security and display brightness, it remains an interesting option for those looking for a compact, versatile e-reader that can handle a variety of content types. Its ability to run any Android reader app is a significant advantage over a Kindle, even if the color display isn’t perfect. For users who don’t require color, a black-and-white E-Ink display might be a better choice, offering sharper text and a brighter screen.

Disclosure : I paid for the Boox 7 Go with my own funds.

Boox Palma Review – Phone-sized Android Tablet with an E-Ink Display

The Boox Palma is an intriguing device that merges the functionality of an Android tablet with the familiar experience of an e-ink display, commonly associated with e-readers like the Kindle. You can see it in action in my latest review.

At first glance, it might be mistaken for a smartphone due to its compact size and form factor, but its real purpose becomes apparent upon closer inspection of its unique display. It’s pricey at $279 (compensated affiliate link) so the audience here may be a bit limited.

The Palma has a 6.13-inch e-ink display with a resolution of 824 by 1648 and a 300 DPI dot pitch, mimicking the display quality of a typical laser printer or printed book. Like the Kindle, it includes a side light that evenly illuminates the screen with an adjustable color temperature. Despite the screen being smaller than the average Kindle, the size and weight—170 grams—make it an option for those who travel frequently and prefer a lightweight, portable reading device.

It also includes a 16-megapixel rear camera, which, while adequate for basic photography, is more suited for document scanning with the included app, which also offers optical character recognition. In fact Boox doesn’t even include a default camera app for photos so you’ll need to get one from the Google Play store. The absence of a front-facing camera and a headphone jack might be a drawback for some users, although Bluetooth and USB-C connectivity are available.

The Palma’s build quality, while predominantly plastic, doesn’t feel cheap. The back of the device features a textured finish that feels like pulpy paper.

One of the Palma’s standout features is its ability to run any Android app, including popular reading apps like Kindle and Nook. The device allows users to adjust the refresh mode settings, optimizing the display performance for different types of content. It should be noted that the high performance modes will degrade the battery life as it must update the screen more frequently.

The battery life is impressive, particularly when used for reading without the side light, offering up to 12-13 hours of usage when using more typical android apps and longer with reading apps that don’t tax its processor.

The Palma also supports basic web browsing, and although it can play videos on apps like YouTube, the experience is suboptimal due to the limitations of the e-ink display. Additionally, while the device is capable of handling emails and simple tasks, the latency in the touch response, particularly when typing, can be frustrating.

In terms of performance, the Palma is powered by an unspecified processor, accompanied by 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage, expandable via an SD card slot. While it isn’t designed for gaming or intensive tasks, it handles its primary functions—reading and light app usage—adequately.

One notable limitation is the lack of support for a dedicated stylus, which might have enhanced its appeal for note-taking or drawing.

The device runs on Android 11, and while it’s not the latest version, the company has committed to providing updates for at least three years. However, the latest update provided security patches only up to January of 2024.

The Boox Palma stands out as a versatile e-reader that offers much more flexibility than traditional devices in its category. Its Android foundation allows users to access a wide range of reading apps and customize their experience, making it an appealing option for avid readers who seek more control over their digital library. While it may not replace a smartphone or a more robust tablet, its niche appeal lies in its ability to bridge the gap between a dedicated e-reader and an Android tablet.

The New Crossbows & Catapults Disappoints..

As a child of the ’80s, one of my favorite board games was “Crossbows and Catapults.” It was a fun battle game where players built a castle with lego-like blocks and then fired plastic pucks back and forth to knock down the opponent’s castle. The game included rubber-band powered crossbows and catapults to fire off the pucks.

For some reason the game popped in my head the other day and upon searching I happened on the rebooted version that was just released this week at retail! You can see it in action in my latest video.

The new version of “Crossbows and Catapults,” priced at $34.99 (affiliate link), comes with a variety of pieces designed to capture the essence of the original game but in far fewer quantities than the original. Part of the appeal of the original game was having enough wall bricks to come up with some unique and creative build strategies. In this new version players are mostly restricted to a singular castle design.

The new spring-loaded catapult feels close in power to the rubber-band powered original with the added bonus of an angle adjustment that was lacking before. But the new crossbow is a serious miss. It fires by squeezing it together (like a pair of tweezers) to force the puck out. The pucks don’t have much velocity out of the crossbow and I found it was hard for my 8 year old to operate.

They likely moved away from rubber bands due to how easy it was to “hack” the original weapons to be significantly more powerful (and dangerous) by adding more bands. That of course made the game even more fun !

Gameplay itself is straightforward and reminiscent of the original. Players take turns launching pucks at each other’s castles, aiming to knock down their opponent’s structures and soldiers. I did find this new version sturdier than the original (perhaps due to the reduced velocity of the weapons) so each game took much longer to play.

Overall, the new iteration of “Crossbows and Catapults” is a mixed bag. It makes an attempt at bringing back a beloved classic, but falls short due to the lack of creative build options and significantly weakened crossbow weapon. The game would have benefited from being reissued vs. reimagined.

8bitdo Retro 18 Review – Retro Mechanical Number Pad

I recently got my hands on the 8bitdo Retro 18, a mechanical number pad designed to complement their retro mechanical keyboard. You can see it in action in my latest video.

As someone who was impressed by the keyboard, I was eager to see how this new addition would perform, especially since it addresses the only major shortcoming of the original keyboard—the lack of a number pad.

The Retro 18 maintains the same aesthetic and feel as the keyboard. It connects independently to your computer, using either a Bluetooth connection, a 2.4 GHz dongle, or a USB Type-C connection. But that means if you have the keyboard already connected via USB directly or with the 2.4ghz dongle, you’ll need to dedicate another USB port to the Retro 18. Bluetooth is also supported which is likely the best solution.

Like the keyboard, the Retro 18 comes in four color schemes: the NES version, which matches my NES-style keyboard, as well as schemes inspired by the Japanese Famicom, Commodore 64, and IBM keyboards. This allows users to maintain a cohesive retro look across their devices. My Retro 18 matched up perfectly with the NES style keyboard I already have.

Priced at around $45, the number pad is equipped with Kailh Box White V2 switches, known for their satisfying click and smooth travel. The key switches are hot-swappable, allowing for easy customization, though it’s worth noting that the number pad, like the keyboard, is not backlit. This might be a drawback for those who need to see the keys in low light, but as a touch typist, I didn’t find it to be a significant issue.

Operating the number pad is straightforward. It has an internal battery with a long lifespan between charges, and the display shows the battery level and power input when charging. One of the standout features is its ability to function as a standalone calculator. By pressing the “calc” button, the number pad switches to calculator mode, disabling input to the host device.

For Windows users, there’s a dedicated button to launch the calculator app, though this feature did not work on my Mac. Unfortunately, the number pad doesn’t offer the same level of key customization as the keyboard, which is a missed opportunity for those who like to tailor their setups.

Despite these minor limitations, the 8bitdo Retro 18 is a solid companion to the retro mechanical keyboard. It feels sturdy, has a satisfying typing experience, and includes the bonus of a built-in calculator. For users who need a reliable and aesthetically pleasing number pad, it’s a worthwhile investment.

Acer Aspire Go 15 Slim Review – AG15-31P-3947

My latest video is a review of the budget friendly Acer Aspire Go 15 Slim. This is a low cost laptop from a major manufacturer that costs about the same as some of the more generic cheap laptops you might encounter.

The price on this one varies almost daily. You can see its latest price on Amazon (compensated affiliate link).

The model I reviewed has an Intel i3-N305 processor, a low-end but capable Alder Lake-N chipset typically found in inexpensive mini PCs. It has 8 GB of DDR5 RAM and 128 GB of slow UFS storage, making this one very similar to an HP Chromebook Plus I looked at a few weeks ago. But this one runs Windows and not ChromeOS.

The storage, however, can be expanded by installing an NVMe hard drive, which is a straightforward process. It was not difficult to pop the bottom panel off the computer to access the components beneath.

The 15.6-inch display, an IPS panel with a 1080p resolution, delivers satisfactory viewing angles and color, but is not suited for professional creative work. It looks to me that it’s likely around 300 nits of overall brightness (Acer did not list the display specifications in their product materials). Though not a touchscreen, the display is quite functional for its price range. The integrated webcam, a modest 720p at 30 frames per second, is just adequate for video calls, with a peculiar filter effect.

Weighing in at 3.75 pounds and constructed entirely out of plastic, the laptop feels reasonably durable despite some flex under pressure. The keyboard and trackpad provide a decent user experience, though the keys could be larger. The inclusion of a small number pad might appeal to some users, despite the cramped layout of certain keys. It does not have a keyboard backlight or fingerprint reader.

Port-wise, the Aspire Go 15 Slim offers a full-service USB Type-C port supporting video output and power delivery. Additionally it has a HDMI output (allowing for two simultaneously display outputs), two USB-A ports, and a headphone/microphone jack.

The downward-firing speakers fall short in audio quality, making external headphones or speakers a necessary accessory for music consumption.

In terms of performance, the laptop handles Microsoft Word and web browsing with ease, though playing back 1080p60 YouTube video revealed some dropped frames, likely an issue that could be fixed with future driver updates. The Speedometer benchmark placed it on par with similarly specced Chromebooks, making it a competent performer for basic tasks.

Battery life spans about 7 to 8 hours under typical usage, though more demanding activities will drain it faster. Gaming tests with older titles like GTA V and PS2 emulations showed acceptable performance at low settings, indicating that while newer games will struggle, there’s plenty of opportunity for older games to run well.

Benchmarks on 3DMark Time Spy revealed performance levels consistent with budget devices, outpaced by older Ryzen processors but still sufficient for less demanding tasks. The fan noise, though constant, remains relatively unobtrusive, helping keep the device cool.

A test with the latest Ubuntu version indicated partial Linux compatibility, with the Mediatek Wi-Fi and Bluetooth card drivers not yet supported.

Overall, the Acer Aspire Go 15 Slim presents a solid option for those looking for a reliable, budget-friendly laptop with better options support versus lesser-known brands.

Sandisk Pro G40 Thunderbolt SSD Review

The Sandisk Pro G40 portable SSD is marketed towards creative professionals and stands out thanks to its Thunderbolt & USB 4.0 compatibility, promising multiple gigabytes per second of transfer rates. But it also is (mostly) backwards compatible to slower USB devices that lack Thunderbolt technology.

I put it through its paces in my most recent review.

Because it’s a “professional” product this drive comes it at a higher price point, about $174 for the 1TB version (compensated affiliate link).

The drive’s build quality is impressive, featuring a solid, rubberized metal design with a grippy bottom, common in other SanDisk drives. It is IP68 weatherproof, making it resistant to splashes, though users should avoid exposing it to harsh weather when plugged in.

It comes with a short Thunderbolt 3 cable USB-C cable which will also work on computers not equipped with USB-C. Other cables, like USB-C to USB-A cables will work as well but those will need to be purchased separately.

Performance tests on a Thunderbolt-equipped Windows computer showed it achieving over 2.4 gigabytes per second in read and write speeds, maintaining this without thermal drop-offs or cache issues. For optimal performance, it’s crucial to connect to the correct port, identified by the Thunderbolt or USB 4.0 icon, as using a standard USB port significantly reduces speeds.

The CrystalDiskMark benchmark further highlighted its strengths in sequential and random reads and writes, suggesting potential for PC gaming. Comparisons with other USB-C-based drives such as the SanDisk Extreme Pro and Samsung T9 showed the Pro G40’s superior performance in Thunderbolt mode. Speeds were comparable to competitors when not connected to the Thunderbolt, however.

The SanDisk Pro G40 SSD contains an off-the-shelf WD Black SN850 NVMe (compensated affiliate link) drive inside its enclosure.

Notably, the Pro G40 does not work with iPhones, which limits its utility despite its potential for high bitrate, lossless video formats. Attempts to use it with other phones also failed, possibly due to power draw issues, making it suitable primarily for computers.

For Windows users, achieving full performance requires enabling write caching in the drive’s settings. I outlined those steps at the 6:12 mark in the video review. This extra step is unnecessary for Mac users, where the drive works at full speed out of the box.

While the Pro G40 is compatible with game consoles, its high performance can’t be utilized, making it an impractical choice for that purpose. However, for PC gaming and professional creative work, it offers excellent performance akin to internal drives. Despite its limitations with mobile devices, the Pro G40 is a compelling option for those needing a fast, reliable external drive.

Eufy e340 Doorbell Review

My quest for the perfect wireless subscription-free doorbell has been a long one.. I’ve looked at Blink, Wyze, Google Nest and a few others but the Eufy e340 is one that I think is the best of the bunch. You can see my full review here.

It currently is selling at its Prime Day sales price at $119 (compensated affiliate link) but is normally $179. An indoor chime costs an additional $39.

One of the standout features of the Eufy E340 is its dual-camera setup. It includes a front-facing camera and a second camera aimed downward to monitor packages left at the doorstep. This design is particularly useful for keeping an eye on deliveries, ensuring that packages are not missed or stolen.

The doorbell stores footage locally, boasting 8GB of internal storage. If more space is needed, users can opt for the chime accessory, which includes an SD card slot for additional storage. There is also compatibility with Eufy’s hub for broader integration with other security devices.

The doorbell’s installation is straightforward, and it includes a secure mounting mechanism to deter theft. Users can also angle the doorbell using an included bracket for optimal coverage. The device operates efficiently in various lighting conditions, featuring both infrared and color night vision modes. The infrared mode uses invisible light to illuminate the scene, while the color mode employs visible lights for a clearer picture at night. You can see examples of both modes in the video above.

Audio quality is another strong point. The doorbell includes a microphone for clear audio recordings and a speaker for two-way communication. This setup allows users to interact with visitors or delivery personnel directly through their smartphones, providing real-time communication without the need for a walkie-talkie style exchange.

Battery life is impressive, lasting several months under low to moderate usage. The device also supports direct power connections if existing doorbell wiring is available, which helps maintain the battery charge indefinitely.

The Eufy app, available on both Android and iOS, provides a comprehensive interface for managing the doorbell. Users can view live footage, review recorded events, and adjust settings directly from the app. The app’s AI offer reliable human detection while ignoring non-essential movements or trees blowing in the wind or animals. This reduces false alerts and enhances the overall user experience.

One of the advanced features is the “Delivery Guard,” which tracks packages left at the door and can also activate a deterrent alert when a package is detected and someone walks up to the door. Users can also receive alerts if a package remains unattended for too long. The familiar faces feature allows users to upload photos of known individuals, enabling the doorbell to recognize and log visits from these people.

All in, the Eufy E340 Dual Camera Wireless Doorbell is a well-rounded, high-performing device that excels in key areas such as video quality, audio clarity, battery life, and smart features. Its dual-camera design and robust app integration make it a versatile choice for anyone seeking a reliable, subscription-free doorbell solution. For those in search of a dependable and cost-effective security addition to their home, this doorbell is worth serious consideration.

Disclosure: I paid for the doorbell with my own funds.

New Amazon Echo Spot 2024 Review – Amazon’s smart alarm clock

While Amazon does regularly update their Echo devices, it’s often hard to discern one version from the next these days as most are more revisions versus something totally new. But the other day Amazon released their latest Echo Spot that looks and operates a little differently than the others. You can see more in my latest review.

Unlike the more versatile Echo Show, the Echo Spot is being marketed primarily as a smart alarm clock. This device lacks a camera and has a more limited display functionality, but at the same time it’s not displaying ads to the user as a means of subsidizing its cost.

The design is reminiscent of other Echo devices, with a cut-off sphere look. It comes with a low resolution display that is mostly dedicated to showing the time and weather conditions. Unlike the Echo Show, it cannot display video footage from security cameras or provide the same depth of visual information. However, it will provide basic visual responses to certain queries, such as showing the weather or the current music track playing.

While it is capable of performing many of the same tasks as other Echo devices, the limited display means it might not be as suitable for tasks that require more visual information, like kitchen timers. The Echo Spot can also handle multiple countdown timers, although the small display makes it challenging to manage several at once.

Amazon offers some limited customization of the clock face, including choosing from a few different layouts for the clock display along with the base color it uses. The clock faces can be adjusted using the touch functionality of the display but it’s much easier to do it via the Alexa app.

Amazon also built in a night mode that dims the display and switches to a red color for the clock to avoid disrupting sleep. Night hours can be set within the app. The alarm clock functionality is also intuitive; you can set alarms by voice and snooze them with a simple tap on the top of the device. There are different alarm tones available, including some celebrity voices, which can add a fun element to waking up.

In terms of audio, the speaker on the Echo Spot is decent, offering a richer sound than the entry-level Echo Dot but not quite at the level of higher-end audio devices. It’s suitable for background music or podcasts, especially when getting ready in the morning.

The physical controls on the top include a mute button for the microphone and volume buttons. The Echo Spot’s microphones are quite sensitive and can pick up commands from across a room, making it a convenient addition to a bedroom or office.

Overall, the Amazon Echo Spot serves well as a smart alarm clock, offering basic smart assistant functionalities without the added complexity or privacy concerns of a camera. It integrates smoothly into Amazon’s ecosystem and provides a balance of features for those looking for a simple, voice-controlled device for their bedside table.

The GMKTec G5, a Mini, Mini-PC, Packs a Punch

The GMKTec Nucbox G5, a “mini” mini-PC, packs a surprising punch with its Intel N97 processor and 12 GB of DDR5 RAM. You can see it in action in my latest review.

The G5 is priced at $149 for the 256GB storage version (compensated affiliate link) and $200 for the 512GB variant. Unlike some of the larger mini PCs with two storage bays, this model offers only one. But both the M.2 2242 storage and bluetooth / wifi card are replaceable and upgradeable.

In terms of ports, the G5 is equipped with two USB 3.0 ports, a USB Type-C for power only, a gigabit Ethernet port, and two HDMI outputs that support 4K at 60Hz. Although it has fewer ports than other mini PCs, it remains practical for basic tasks.

Performance-wise, the G5 handles web browsing and video playback smoothly, even at 4K. It managed to play back a 4K YouTube video without drop frames after initial buffering. The device’s fan is noticeable during intensive tasks, yet it maintains a manageable noise level.

For office tasks, the G5 is more than adequate, running Microsoft Word at 4K without lag. However, it lacked a VESA mount plate in the box, limiting its mounting options. Despite this, its small footprint makes it a convenient desktop addition.

Gaming on the G5 proved impressive for its size. Running a remastered version of “Dark Forces” at 1080p maintained 60fps. GTA V at 720p at its lowest settings hovered around 40 fps, showcasing its capability with older, resource-intensive games. Emulating PS2 games via PCSX2 delivered a consistent 60fps running at the default settings and the games’ native resolution.

Benchmarking on 3DMark TimeSpy resulted in a score of 487, surpassing similar mini PCs with the N100 processor. While it may not match Ryzen or Intel Core Ultra machines, its performance remains commendable for the price. On the 3DMark stress test, it achieved a passing grade of 97.9%, indicating stable performance under load despite its smaller fan having to work harder.

The G5, like many of the Mini PCs we’ve looked at recently comes with what appears to be a legitimately licensed and activated copy of Windows 11 Pro. No malware was detected during testing, but it allowed local account creation without needing a Microsoft account. I suspect that they are buying up bulk OEM Pro licenses and assigning them to these PCs.

Linux performance on the G5 was seamless, with all hardware components functioning properly on the latest version of Ubuntu. As we saw recently with the N100 processor, the G5 has great potential for Plex serving with its slightly faster N97 chip. It is of course limited by its internal storage capacity, necessitating USB drives for expansion.

I recently conducted a live stream where I tested a few other Mini PCs from an upcoming review. You can also see all of my Mini PC reviews here. It’s fun to see how far they’ve come over the last decade.

Overall, the GMKTec Nucbox G5 is a versatile mini PC, suitable for office tasks, light gaming, and media serving. Its compact size and decent performance make it an excellent secondary computer for various uses. But I still prefer the N100 based G3 as it offers more expandability.

Disclosure: The G5 was provided to the channel free of charge for this review. No other compensation was received, nor did anyone review or approve the review before it was uploaded. All opinions are my own.

Budget Laser Printer Review: The HP LaserJet M209dw

I recently had the opportunity to review the HP LaserJet M209dw, a budget-friendly laser printer ideal for those who don’t print frequently and are looking for an economical option. The printer, priced at around $120 (compensated affilate link), features a low cost per print and replacement cartridges at $54 for 1100 pages and $88 for 2400 pages. Interestingly, HP also offers an Instant Ink subscription, although for this model, purchasing high-capacity cartridges outright proves more economical. You can see it in action in my latest review.

One of the standout features of laser printers like the M209dw is their reliability for infrequent printing – even if it’s left idle for months. Unlike inkjet printers that often require nozzle cleaning after prolonged inactivity, laser printers remain functional without the need for such maintenance. This makes them particularly suitable for environments where printing needs are sporadic.

In terms of performance, the M209dw boasts a print speed of 30 pages per minute, which is quite impressive for its price range. During my tests, the printer handled a variety of print jobs over a Wi-Fi network efficiently. Despite being a bit noisier than some other laser printers, the speed and quality of the output were commendable. The standard print mode delivers sharp text and decent B&W photos at 600 DPI, which is sufficient for most black-and-white printing needs.

Setting up the printer was straightforward, thanks to the HP smartphone app, which facilitated wireless connection. Additionally, the printer can connect over USB or ethernet. Once connected, it was effortlessly recognized by various devices, including Macs, Windows PCs, iPads, iPhones, Android phones, and even Chromebooks.

Another notable feature is the duplex printing capability, which allows automatic double-sided printing. This function works smoothly, albeit a bit slower than single-sided printing as it has to pull the paper back in to flip it over.

The M209dw’s paper handling capabilities include a 150-sheet tray and a 100-sheet output tray. While it can handle standard paper sizes efficiently, its design may not be ideal for printing on smaller items like index cards or envelopes, as there is no manual feeder for straight-through printing.

One important consideration for potential buyers is HP’s aggressive stance on generic cartridges. The company employs dynamic security measures to prevent the use of third-party cartridges, frequently updating firmware to enforce this policy. This could be a drawback for those who prefer using cheaper, non-HP cartridges. Additionally, the persistent promotion of the Instant Ink subscription inside the app, along with a hard-to-remove promotional sticker on the printer itself, might be an annoyance.

Despite these minor drawbacks, the HP LaserJet M209dw stands out as a cost-effective, reliable option for users with occasional printing needs. Its speed, print quality, and ease of setup make it a compelling choice in the budget laser printer category.

Disclosure: This item came in free of charge from the online retailer Flip. However Flip nor HP reviewed or approved this review before it was uploaded, no other compensation was received and all opinions are my own.

Copilot+ AI Features Are Meh…

The new ARM-based CoPilot+ PCs (compensated affilate link) have generated a lot of buzz, but the reality of their exclusive AI features is far less impressive that marketed. HP loaned me their Omnibook X 14 for my recent review and I put Microsoft’s heavily marketed AI features to the test. The verdict? Meh.. See more in this video.

Starting with the Paint application, the “Co-create” feature allows users to enhance their drawings with AI with images generated on-device using the new Snapdragon Elite X processor. The feature will generate artwork in a number of different styles based on the user’s original drawing but it also requires a text prompt.

Because the image generation happens on device, the Snapdragon isn’t capable of generating the types of beautiful images found on cloud-based solutions like OpenAI’s Dall-E. Still the images generate quickly and without the complex UI of some of the open source on-device solutions I’ve played with. In short, it’s a gee-whiz feature that sorta works but is not very useful.

My big gripe is that although this AI does its work on-device, it still requires an Internet connection to execute. The reason? Microsoft’s servers review each request to make sure users aren’t doing something the company finds inappropriate.

In the Photos app, the AI enhancement feature can add fun background elements to portraits but struggles with more complex tasks. Like the Cocreate feature, it will require a prompt (and server approval) but will do its work on an existing photo. But the results are lackluster at best. Images without people get mangled up pretty decently. When people are present the AI will only add background effects as safety policies will not allow the user to do any manipulation of images with human faces.

Live Captions, another CoPilot+ feature, offers real-time translation of video and audio content. This feature stands out as genuinely useful, accurately translating spoken language during video playback and calls. However, it only translates into English and does not support two-way translation just yet.

Copilot+ adds a few more webcam Studio Effects like eye contact adjustment, making it appear as though the user is looking at the camera even when they’re not. This subtle feature, along with improved background blur and creative filters, enhances video call experiences but remains a minor improvement of a feature already found in recent Intel and AMD based devices.

Notably absent from these devices is what was supposed to be the flagship AI feature called Recall. This feature takes screenshots of the user’s activity along with associated documents and applications open at the time and allows the user to search through their history using plain language prompts. If, for example, a user was planning a trip and lost track of a website they had visited a simple text query could pull it out of the usage history.

Recall is a great task for the limited capacity of the on-board NPU but it raised a number of privacy and security concerns that forced Microsoft to pause the feature’s release. Without Recall the AI functionality Microsoft built their Copilot+ PC marketing campaign around falls way short in this reviewer’s opinion.

Overall, while the AI features on CoPilot+ PCs are interesting, they are not compelling enough to justify choosing these devices over traditional Intel or AMD-based machines. The promise of superior battery life and performance improvements will be the real test for these ARM machines. You can check out my review of the HP Omnibook X here to see how well it does in those key areas.

HP Omnibook X 14 Review – ARM Based CoPilot+ Windows PC

I recently had the chance to test out the new HP Omnibook X14, one of the first set of PCs marketed under Microsoft’s Copilot+ line. This model is powered by the Snapdragon X Elite processor, an ARM-based chip similar to those found in smartphones and MacBooks. Historically, Windows on ARM has struggled with performance and compatibility issues, but this new chip aims to bridge that gap.

You can see it in action in my latest review!

The Omnibook X14 is priced at around $1,149 (compensated affiliate link), placing it in the mid-range of the laptop market. It boasts several AI features, although these seem underwhelming and not a significant reason to choose this model over Intel or AMD alternatives. I demoed those features in my previous video. My focus for this review is on its performance as a standard laptop.

In terms of hardware, it comes with 16 GB of LPDDR5x RAM and a 512 GB NVMe solid-state drive. The 14-inch display runs at a 2.2k resolution and is a touch panel, although it doesn’t support full 360-degree rotation. The build quality is solid, with an aluminum body and a weight just under 3 pounds. However, the keyboard tends to lift with the display, a minor inconvenience not seen in more premium laptops.

The Omnibook features a decent 1440p webcam with a manual shutter, suitable for video calls. The speakers are adequate for conference calls but not impressive for music. The keyboard is comfortable, with good key spacing and travel, and the trackpad works well once tap-to-click is disabled. It supports facial recognition for quick logins but lacks a fingerprint reader. In terms of ports, it includes a 10 gigabit USB-C port and a faster 40 gigabit USB 4.0 port, although compatibility with Thunderbolt devices is hit-or-miss in my testing on the USB 4.

Performance-wise, the Omnibook X14 handles productivity tasks well. Running Microsoft Word and browsing with the Brave browser was smooth and responsive, comparable to mid-range Intel or AMD laptops that cost about the same. This is a major improvement over prior ARM windows PCs I’ve tested where performance was well below comparably priced PCs.

Battery life is the standout feature here, with reports suggesting up to 24 hours on a single charge. In my experience, it easily handled a full day of work without needing a recharge, aligning it with the longevity seen in MacBook Air models. I have yet to hit a batter warning even with leaving it unplugged throughout the day.

For more demanding tasks, such as video editing, the laptop performed admirably with DaVinci Resolve when using the ARM-optimized version of the software. This marks a significant improvement over previous ARM-based machines, although the availability of optimized applications like this one remains a limiting factor.

Windows is doing a much better job of emulating Intel & AMD x86/x64 code on ARM processors – applications run without much fuss provided they’re relatively simple applications. But as before gaming remains a weak point. Popular titles like No Man’s Sky and Red Dead Redemption 2 failed to run properly due to compatibility issues. Doom Eternal did boot up but experienced significant glitches and inconsistent performance. All three games run at surprisingly good framerates on similarly priced Intel and AMD hardware.

Benchmark tests, such as 3DMark Wildlife, suggest there is potential for great performance once games are optimized for the chipset. But, like the video editing example above, developers have to make some effort to port their games over to the new platform to realize the performance potential. The Windows emulation layer simply doesn’t cut it.

I also attempted to run Linux on the Omnibook but was unsuccessful. The ARM version of Ubuntu did not fully boot, though it reached the GRUB screen. The Omnibook does run with a standard UEFI bios so it should be possible to get Linux up and running in the very near future.

The HP Omnibook X and the other Snapdragon Elite X PCs released this week represent a step forward for Windows running on ARM processors. Previous iterations sacrificed both performance and compatibility for battery life, but these new machines only struggle with compatibility.

For now, if your needs are basic productivity applications and super long battery life, the Omnibook X is a solid choice. However, if gaming or specialized software is a priority, you’ll want to stick with more traditional hardware unless there’s a specific ARM port of the application. By comparison, Intel and AMD battery life is much better than it was a few years ago (although not as good as the new Copilot+ line), and the latest iteration of x64 processors also have NPU hardware acceleration for AI applications.

A Gadget Haul from the new Flip Social Shopping Platform

I’ve been exploring a new shopping platform called Flip (compensated affiliate link), which blends social media dynamics with e-commerce. At first glance, Flip resembles TikTok, but it operates within its own app, emphasizing video reviews and social interaction. The platform rewards video reviews of products with discounts, monetization and free products. You can see how it works and some of the stuff I’ve acquired so far in my latest review.

In full disclosure, Flip approached me, providing about $150 in seed money to explore their platform along with a small bonus for posting some video reviews. I later purchased $150 worth of items with my own funds to see how the free product offer works. More on that below.

Originally targeting the health and beauty sector, Flip has now expanded into gadgets. Users purchase items, review them, and earn monetization for their video reviews. This revenue stream lasts for 30 days, during which viewers’ engagement generates income. Additionally, users receive sales commissions for purchases made through their review videos.

After the initial purchase and review, users can obtain free items on subsequent orders, provided they continue reviewing products. This generous policy may not be sustainable long-term, but it currently offers significant benefits to consumers.

Flip’s interface presents reviews from other customers prominently. Each view increments a discount amount that can be applied to future purchases, potentially reaching up to 30% off. While Flip’s prices can sometimes exceed those on Amazon, the accumulated discounts will often keep Flip competitive. However, it’s essential to remain an educated consumer and ensure the discounted prices are genuinely a better deal.

Navigating Flip involves both browsing and searching, though the inventory is less extensive than other retailers. Categories and brand filters aid in locating specific items, but the platform’s design leans heavily toward browsing. When selecting items, users can see who else has purchased them and even message those users for insights.

A potential privacy concern arises from the open nature of the platform as users’ purchases are visible to others. While profiles can be made private, this limits the platform’s social benefits.

Upon adding items to the cart, users can select from a range of free products based on their spending if eligible. In my experience with a $150 order I received a Logitech HOTAS game controller valued at around $250. I also managed to pick up a $90 Mophie magsafe phone charger.

My third item, an HP monitor with a built in webcam, was out of stock. Flip canceled that free order and did not give me an option to select an alternative through the app. I have contacted customer service and they are working on manually sending me the additional item I was entitled to. Your mileage will vary.

To hit the $150 I purchased a “Big Sur” Polaroid instant camera and a ProtoArc Hub Mouse. The Polaroid camera, a collaboration between The Parks Project and Retrospekt, is a refurbished vintage Polaroid 600 Instant Camera. Flip didn’t sell the film so I had to pick up a pack on Amazon. But this is an actual vintage 80’s era Polaroid camera that was refurbished into a product that feels brand new.

The ProtoArc Hub Mouse looks like a standard desktop mouse but it has a little USB-C hub tucked in its rear end. The hub sports an HDMI output, a USB-A port, and a USB-C power passthrough.

From my initial subsidized order, I received a solar power bank, a Movo smartphone cage and a boom mic enclosure. You can see them all in the video linked above.

Flip’s social shopping extends to the Desire Wishlist feature, allowing users to gift items to each other. They have some fun games as part of this where users can guess who sent them the item or be completely anonymous in handing out their gifts.

It remains to be seen if Flip’s business model is sustainable in the tech space. Many other platforms have found that beauty and household products do better than tech which is more expensive and less prone to browsing. But in the meantime you may as well take advantage of the freebies while they last!

Google Pixel 8a Smartphone Review

I recently had the opportunity to review the Google Pixel 8a smartphone, a device that promises to deliver flagship-level performance at a more affordable price point. Every year, I try to examine one of these mid-range phones to see how they measure up, and this year, Google has produced a phone that feels remarkably similar to its higher-end counterparts. You can see my full review here.

The Pixel 8a is priced at $499 for the 128GB model and $559 for the 256GB version. It features the Google Tensor G3 processor, 8GB of RAM, and a 6.1-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. The display supports HDR and can reach a maximum brightness of 2,000 nits, making it bright and clear in various lighting conditions. The phone is equipped with a fingerprint sensor under the display and facial recognition for secure access.

These specifications line up almost identically to the more expensive Pixel 8 that came out last year. They did not dial back the performance of the processor vs. their more expensive models.

The only area where Google has made some compromises with the 8a is in the build build quality. Unlike the Pixel 8 and 8 Pro, which feature glass backs, the Pixel 8a has a plastic back. However, it still supports wireless charging, albeit at a slower rate than its more expensive siblings. The front of the phone is protected by Gorilla Glass 3, and it has an aluminum band around the edges, giving it a sturdy feel despite its lower price.

The phone is weatherproof with an IP67 rating, meaning it can handle dust and brief immersions in water. The battery life is comparable to other smartphones in this price range, and in my testing, it lasted a full day even in areas with poor cell coverage.

In terms of connectivity, the Pixel 8a includes a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, but it lacks a headphone jack and SD card slot. Users will need to rely on Bluetooth or USB-C headphones for audio and Google’s cloud storage for additional space.

The camera system on the Pixel 8a is impressive. It has a 64-megapixel main camera with a 26mm wide-angle lens and a 13-megapixel ultra-wide lens. The main camera performs well in various lighting conditions, providing detailed and vibrant images. The ultra-wide lens is useful for capturing more of a scene, although it struggles in low light due to its smaller aperture.

Video capabilities are strong, with the main camera supporting 4K recording at 60 frames per second. The ultra-wide lens can only manage 30 frames per second at 4K, but overall, the video quality is good, with effective stabilization for smooth footage.

One of the standout features of the Pixel 8a is its AI-driven photo editing tools. Users can use the “best take” feature to combine the best facial expressions from multiple shots into one image. There’s also an AI-powered eraser tool that can remove unwanted objects from photos and fill in the background seamlessly, though the results can sometimes be less than perfect.

In gaming, the Pixel 8a performs well, handling games like Roblox and emulators like the Dolphin Gamecube emulator without issues. Benchmarks show that its performance is on par with the more expensive Pixel 8 Pro, making it a capable device for both casual and more demanding users. Just note that Google’s Tensor 3 chip lags behind the processors found in Apple’s phones—all of the Pixel 8 phones perform about the same as the iPhone 12, which came out in 2020.

Google promises seven years of software support for the Pixel 8a until 2031. The support expiration clock starts ticking in 2024, so users purchasing the phone a few years from now will have the same expiration date.

Overall, the Google Pixel 8a offers a compelling package for those looking for a high-performance smartphone without breaking the bank. Its combination of a high-refresh-rate display, strong camera system, and robust performance makes it a standout in the mid-range market. While it may not have the premium build quality of more expensive phones, it delivers excellent value and is a great option for budget-conscious consumers.

Disclosure: Google provided the phone to the channel free of charge. No other compensation was received nor did they did not review or approve this review before it was uploaded.

GMKTec Nucbox K9 Mini PC Review

I’ve been reviewing a lot of mini PCs lately, and I’ve got another one in from GMKtec that stands out due to its Intel Core Ultra 5. You can see what it’s all about in my latest review.

The price point on this will vary quite a bit. In most cases you’ll see a coupon code on Amazon that will dramatically reduce its price so be sure to click that before checking out.

The GMKtec Nucbox K9 features an Intel Core Ultra 125H running at a 65-watt TDP. It comes with 32 GB of DDR5 5600 MHz RAM, which is upgradeable to 64 GB, and two NVMe SSD slots. The unit includes a 1 TB NVMe SSD from Mason Semi, and you can add or swap out SSDs as needed.

In terms of ports, the Nucbox K9 is well-equipped. There’s an audio input/output, a full-service USB 4.0 port running at 40 Gbps, capable of video output and powering the computer up to 100 watts. However, the included 120-watt power supply is recommended for regular use. I tested the USB 4 port with a Thunderbolt SSD, confirming it delivers the full bandwidth. There are also two USB 3 ports on the front, two USB-A ports, a DisplayPort out, an HDMI out for three simultaneous 4K displays, and two 2.5 Gbps Ethernet ports, both performing at full bandwidth. The Ethernet chipset is from Realtek.

The Nucbox K9 runs Windows 11 Pro, though the onboarding process uses a local account instead of connecting to a Microsoft account. However, a scan for malware and viruses came up clean. Web performance is excellent, and it handles 4K 60 FPS video on YouTube without drop frames.

For video editing, I tested DaVinci Resolve with a 4K 60 FPS project. It handled transitions effortlessly without needing an external GPU, suitable for simple editing tasks.

Gaming performance is also notable. Running No Man’s Sky at 1080p on standard settings achieved just under 60 FPS. Red Dead Redemption 2 at 1080p on the lowest settings performed well, between 40 and 50 FPS. Grand Theft Auto 5 at 1080p on high settings stayed mostly above 60 FPS.

Linux performance was decent, with most hardware detected except for audio. Ethernet, Wi-Fi, and video worked well.

Overall, the GMKtec Nucbox K9 offers a lot of hardware for its price, including ample RAM, storage, and a high-performing processor. It’s a good option if you’re comfortable with potential support issues from an overseas company. Despite the higher cost compared to previous models, it delivers impressive performance and is a solid choice for those willing to take a slight risk on long-term support.

Disclosure: GMKTech provided the Mini PC free of charge. No other compensation was received nor did they did not review or approve this review before it was uploaded.

Walmart Onn 4k Pro Streaming Box Review

Walmart quietly released a “pro” version of their Onn TV streaming box. Many of you were eager for me to take a look at this one. You can see my full review here.

The Onn 4K Pro, retailing for around $50 (compensated affiliate link), competes with the Roku and Amazon in the low-cost streaming box space. What’s nice about these Walmart devices is that they provide a pure Google TV experience which isn’t much different from Google’s own streaming players.

Inside the box, you’ll find all the essentials: the streaming box itself, a power cord, an HDMI cable, and a remote control. Interestingly, my package included a more basic version of the remote compared to a backlit version that some other buyers received.

What sets the “pro” device apart is that it functions not only as a streaming box but also as a Google Assistant speaker when the TV is off. In my testing it worked very similar to Google’s speaker offerings but it was unable to play music through its speaker, only through the television.

The box boasts an intuitive setup, connecting easily to Wi-Fi or via an Ethernet cable. However, it only supports 100 megabits of bandwidth for Ethernet, not gigabit, which might be a limitation for some. I also found its Wifi performance, while adequate for streaming applications, did not fare much better than the Ethernet. It’s compatible with Dolby Vision and HDR on TVs that support these features along with Atmos audio for streaming apps that offer spatial audio.

For general consumers, the Onn 4K Pro presents a value proposition with its dual functionality and the flexibility of Google TV’s operating system, allowing access to a wide range of apps and services. Its performance is robust enough for most streaming needs, and the inclusion of a voice-activated assistant is a nice feature.

Despite its “Pro” designation, the Onn 4K Pro may not satisfy the demands of avid tech enthusiasts, particularly those focused on gaming or high-end home theater setups. It performs adequately for streaming and basic tasks but falls short in handling more intensive applications like advanced gaming or lossless audio playback in Plex, which does not support DTS:X or Dolby TrueHD Atmos.

In benchmark testing, the Onn 4K Pro Google TV Streaming Box scored 579 on the 3DMark Slingshot test, indicating performance on par with the lower cost Onn streaming box I looked at last year, along with similar Android 4K boxes like the Chromecast with Google TV. However, it falls short compared to the more powerful Fire TV Cube Gen 3.

All that said I would definitely recommend the Pro version of the box over their lower cost offering for the streaming media use cases that it’s mostly designed for. It’s not that expensive and works well as a Google assistant even when the TV is off.