Category: video

Google Killed the Chromecast .. Four years ago!

Google has officially declared the Chromecast hardware as we once knew it to be dead, but in reality, the Chromecast hardware as we knew it was discontinued four years ago. I take a look back (and forward) at Google’s TV streaming devices in my latest video.

Chromecast was first introduced in 2013, and it was a game-changer at the time. For just $35, users could stream content from their phones to their televisions, an especially valuable feature in a time when most TVs were not smart and streaming boxes were expensive.

The Chromecast wasn’t just a device that mirrored content from a phone; it established a direct connection with streaming services, making the experience smoother and more reliable. The affordable price point and the functionality it offered made Chromecast a hit.

As the years passed, Google made several updates to Chromecast. In 2015, they redesigned the device, making it more user-friendly by turning it into a dongle, which was easier to connect to a television. They also introduced a Chromecast Audio device, which allowed users to stream audio to any speaker system. In 2016, the Chromecast Ultra was released, offering support for 4K streaming. Two years later Google released a third generation 1080p Chromecast.

Competing streamers, like Roku and Amazon’s Fire TV, fired back by releasing devices at or around the Chromecast price point. These offered a greater value proposition as they did not require a phone to use and had a full TV interface with remote controls.

In 2020, Google made a significant shift with the introduction of the Chromecast with Google TV. This device was more akin to an Android TV device than a traditional Chromecast. Like its low cost competitors, It came with a remote and an interface, eliminating the need to use a phone to control the device but still offered that as an option. While it still retained the Chromecast name, the core experience had changed, marking the end of Chromecast as it was originally known.

For Google, maintaining the infrastructure for these inexpensive devices became less viable, especially when other companies were willing to produce similar hardware. Devices like Walmart’s Onn boxes are examples of this shift, where Google incurs no overhead costs but still benefits from licensing fees. Additionally, many modern televisions now come with Google TV built-in, further reducing the need for a separate Chromecast device.

Despite the discontinuation of the original Chromecast hardware, the casting protocol itself is far from dead. Users can still cast content from their phones to various devices, including Google TV and other Android-based streaming boxes and smart TVs. This functionality remains a key part of the Android ecosystem, and it is unlikely to disappear anytime soon.

Google’s latest streaming device, the more premium Google TV Streamer (affiliate link), will soon be their only streaming box offering. It will offer better performance than the 2020 4k Chromecast dongle along with more storage and RAM. But it will still be outclassed by the the Nvidia Shield, which remains the gold standard for Android TV devices since its 2015 release.

In essence, while the Chromecast name may have been added to the list of Google’s discontinued products, the technology and principles behind it are still very much alive. Google’s strategy seems to be shifting towards licensing and partnering with other manufacturers rather than producing the hardware themselves.

I got invited to the White House! Seriously!

I am excited to announce that I’ve been invited to attend a policy conference at the White House that will focus on the state of the “Creator Economy.” This upcoming event will bring together industry professionals, policy experts and content creators like myself to discuss the challenges and opportunities within the independent content landscape. It’s an exciting opportunity to be in the room where government and industry representatives will address issues that directly impact our work as creators.

The conference is set to take place at the Executive Office Building, next to the White House, and will cover a wide range of topics, including fair pay, artificial intelligence, mental health, and likely other issues that will come up throughout the day.

As part of the application process for the conference, I highlighted several concerns, including the potential risks of overregulation in emerging sectors like the Creator Economy. While regulation can address certain issues, there’s always the danger of unintended consequences that could stifle innovation and growth. This is particularly relevant in our field, where the landscape is still evolving.

But there are areas that need some attention. A significant issue I plan to bring up is the industry trend to not fairly compensate creators for the value they bring to these platforms. For example, YouTube has implemented a different model for its Shorts platform that pays fractions of pennies on the dollar vs. long term views. YouTube has also made it more difficult for creators to earn from other sources as they now restrict offsite linking on Short content.

Another key topic I intend to discuss is the growing influence of AI in content recommendation and its impact on creators and society at large. Algorithms increasingly dictate what content is shown to viewers (irrespective of who they are subscribed to), often steering them towards popular trends rather than diverse, high-quality content.

This has led to a decline in content quality and a narrowing of the types of content that reach audiences. It’s a self-perpetuating cycle where the algorithms reinforce trends, making it harder for creators to break through with original ideas. And in matters of public policy there’s a limited diversity of opinion presented to viewers.

I’m also concerned about the use of creator content that is being used to train AI models without adequate compensation. Value is being extracted from creators without a fair return, which is something both the industry and potentially government should address.

The conference will also likely touch on broader issues, such as the recent law requiring TikTok to divest its Chinese ownership.

As I prepare for this event, I’m looking forward to the opportunity to share these concerns and hear from others about their experiences. While there’s still much work to be done to improve the Creator Economy, it’s encouraging to see these conversations happening at such a high level. After the conference, I plan to provide a detailed account of the discussions and share my observations.

Stay tuned!

Vibe is a Free Cross Platform Transcription App

I recently stumbled across an intriguing tool called Vibe, an open-source, cross-platform transcription utility that offers a straightforward solution for converting audio and video files into text. This tool is available on Mac, Windows, and Linux, making it accessible to a broad range of users. You can see it in action in my latest review.

Vibe utilizes the open-source Whisper engine from OpenAI for its transcriptions. The setup process is quite simple, and the software runs directly on your device, which means that none of your data is sent to the cloud.

For my test, I used an interview I had conducted with Tom Persky from FloppyDisk.com, which was about 14 minutes long. I selected the file in Vibe and initiated the transcription process. The application worked through the file rapidly, producing a very accurate transcript.

Vibe offers several output formats, including plain text, HTML, PDF, and SRT files for closed captions. The SRT functionality is particularly useful for those looking to add captions to videos for Plex. However, I noticed that the captions were somewhat bunched together in the initial 30 seconds of the file. After some adjustments, specifically by altering the timestamp settings and sentence length options, I was able to produce a more viewer-friendly SRT file, with captions displayed more evenly across the video.

The tool also supports various transcription models, allowing users to switch between them depending on their needs. The default model worked well for me, but for those requiring different levels of detail or handling more complex audio, alternative models are easily accessible through the settings.

While Vibe is still a work in progress with limited features, it’s a promising start. Its simplicity and effectiveness make it a valuable tool for anyone needing quick and reliable transcriptions. I particularly appreciate that it’s an open-source project, inviting community contributions that could enhance its functionality in the future.

Boox Palma Review – Phone-sized Android Tablet with an E-Ink Display

The Boox Palma is an intriguing device that merges the functionality of an Android tablet with the familiar experience of an e-ink display, commonly associated with e-readers like the Kindle. You can see it in action in my latest review.

At first glance, it might be mistaken for a smartphone due to its compact size and form factor, but its real purpose becomes apparent upon closer inspection of its unique display. It’s pricey at $279 (compensated affiliate link) so the audience here may be a bit limited.

The Palma has a 6.13-inch e-ink display with a resolution of 824 by 1648 and a 300 DPI dot pitch, mimicking the display quality of a typical laser printer or printed book. Like the Kindle, it includes a side light that evenly illuminates the screen with an adjustable color temperature. Despite the screen being smaller than the average Kindle, the size and weight—170 grams—make it an option for those who travel frequently and prefer a lightweight, portable reading device.

It also includes a 16-megapixel rear camera, which, while adequate for basic photography, is more suited for document scanning with the included app, which also offers optical character recognition. In fact Boox doesn’t even include a default camera app for photos so you’ll need to get one from the Google Play store. The absence of a front-facing camera and a headphone jack might be a drawback for some users, although Bluetooth and USB-C connectivity are available.

The Palma’s build quality, while predominantly plastic, doesn’t feel cheap. The back of the device features a textured finish that feels like pulpy paper.

One of the Palma’s standout features is its ability to run any Android app, including popular reading apps like Kindle and Nook. The device allows users to adjust the refresh mode settings, optimizing the display performance for different types of content. It should be noted that the high performance modes will degrade the battery life as it must update the screen more frequently.

The battery life is impressive, particularly when used for reading without the side light, offering up to 12-13 hours of usage when using more typical android apps and longer with reading apps that don’t tax its processor.

The Palma also supports basic web browsing, and although it can play videos on apps like YouTube, the experience is suboptimal due to the limitations of the e-ink display. Additionally, while the device is capable of handling emails and simple tasks, the latency in the touch response, particularly when typing, can be frustrating.

In terms of performance, the Palma is powered by an unspecified processor, accompanied by 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage, expandable via an SD card slot. While it isn’t designed for gaming or intensive tasks, it handles its primary functions—reading and light app usage—adequately.

One notable limitation is the lack of support for a dedicated stylus, which might have enhanced its appeal for note-taking or drawing.

The device runs on Android 11, and while it’s not the latest version, the company has committed to providing updates for at least three years. However, the latest update provided security patches only up to January of 2024.

The Boox Palma stands out as a versatile e-reader that offers much more flexibility than traditional devices in its category. Its Android foundation allows users to access a wide range of reading apps and customize their experience, making it an appealing option for avid readers who seek more control over their digital library. While it may not replace a smartphone or a more robust tablet, its niche appeal lies in its ability to bridge the gap between a dedicated e-reader and an Android tablet.

Lenovo Yoga 7 16″ Review (16AHP9)

I recently spent some time with Lenovo’s 16-inch Yoga 7 laptop, a machine that sits in an intriguing spot in the market, especially considering its current sale price of $549 at Best Buy (affiliate link). As the back-to-school season approaches, this model might catch the eye of students and budget-conscious consumers alike. You can see more in my latest review.

The Lenovo Yoga 7 is part of the Yoga line, known for its flexible design. This 16-inch laptop can be used as a traditional laptop or folded back into tablet mode, making use of its touch display. Although the pen is optional and wasn’t included with my review unit, the ability to draw and interact directly with the screen adds another layer of functionality.

The 16-inch display is a touch screen that offers a decent experience, though it’s not tailored for professional use. With a resolution of 1920×1200 and a 16:10 aspect ratio, it provides a bit more vertical space compared to standard 16:9 screens, which is useful for productivity tasks. However, its 300 nits brightness and limited color accuracy may leave photographers and video editors wanting more.

Under the hood, the Yoga 7 is powered by an AMD Ryzen 8640HS processor, paired with 8GB of RAM. While the processor is capable, the limited RAM is a bottleneck for more demanding tasks, especially since it’s not upgradeable. The laptop handles basic tasks like web browsing and video streaming without issue, but newer AAA games and more intensive applications like video editing might struggle due to the RAM constraint. The built-in 512GB NVMe storage is upgradeable, providing some flexibility for those needing more space.

Weighing in at 4.39 pounds, the Yoga 7 is not the lightest option out there, but its solid build quality justifies the weight. The all-metal chassis and thick glass display contribute to its sturdy feel, making it a device that can withstand regular use. The keyboard is comfortable to type on, with well-spaced keys and a backlight, though the number pad’s smaller keys may take some getting used to. The touchpad performs well, with a reliable physical click throughout most of its surface, and the fingerprint reader adds a convenient way to log in quickly.

The laptop also comes with a decent selection of ports, including two USB-C ports that support power delivery and video output, a full-sized HDMI port, and a microSD card slot. However, the placement of the power button on the side can be a nuisance, as it’s easy to hit accidentally when handling the laptop. The 1080p webcam performs adequately for video calls, and the built-in shutter provides a simple way to ensure privacy.

In terms of performance, the Yoga 7 handles basic tasks with ease. Web browsing, video streaming, and light multitasking are smooth and responsive. Basic 4k video editing in DaVinci Resolve was a little better than expected, but more demanding projects will be hindered by the limited RAM. While older games like GTA V ran well, more recent titles struggled, particularly those that require more memory. Benchmark tests also revealed a bit of thermal throttling under heavy sustained load that might impact performance when running games or other demanding tasks.

Despite these drawbacks, the Yoga 7 does have some redeeming qualities. Its battery life is impressive, thanks to the large 71Wh battery, providing around 10 hours of use under light workloads. Additionally, the laptop runs relatively quietly, even under load, which could be a selling point for those who prioritize a quiet working environment.

The Yoga 7 also supports Linux, and my experience running Ubuntu was smooth, with all hardware components being detected and functioning properly.

Overall, the Lenovo Yoga 7 is a solid option for those needing a reliable laptop for everyday tasks. Its build quality and design are standout features, and while its performance is hampered by limited RAM, it remains a decent value, especially at its current sale price.

ATSC 3 Update: Broadcasters say we are the “Super, super, super sub minority”

I’ve been receiving numerous inquiries about new developments with the NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 over the air television standard. Unfortunately, there isn’t much news to report beyond some markets experimenting with streaming Internet-based channels that initiate their connections based on a URL passed over the air. You can see which markets support this new feature over at Rabbitears.info.

The other bit of news is that the industry refuses to budge on their desire to encrypt the public airwaves and make it more difficult for consumers to watch television in their own homes. In a recent interview, an industry spokesperson said those opposed to encryption are a “super, super, super sub minority” of the overall population. I disagree, and my latest video looks at why more people care than the industry’s tunnel vision suggests.

The interview was conducted by Dylan Ross of WNY Over The Air with David Arland of Arland Communications, who represents several industry players in the ATSC 3.0 rollout including the A3SA, the group responsible for the encryption.

Arland touched on gateway devices like the HDHomerun that bring a TV signal into one device and distribute over a local network to other devices. Arland said in the interview that gateway devices that support ATSC 3 encryption are coming, a claim that has been made since stations started locking their signals down a year ago. To date none of the certified ATSC 3 tuners allow gateway functions.

While the industry maintains this use case is minimal, a quick search of Amazon for “tv tuners” reveals that four of the top five best selling tuner products are in fact gateway devices: a few different SKUs of the 4th generation Tablo and the HDHomerun Flex 4k.

Arland also said claims that I and others have made that encryption is a tactic to steer consumers to subscription services is “bogus.” But if encryption is allowed by the FCC, that will be the only way for consumers to consume local tv stations in more than one room off of a single connection.

Despite the industry’s stance, consumer demand for flexible viewing options persists. Companies providing gateway hardware and software solutions for ATSC 1.0 continue to thrive, suggesting a substantial market interest. The future of DRM encryption will likely be decided by the FCC or Congress, influenced by the upcoming election and subsequent appointments to the FCC.

If you care about this issue, I encourage you to file a comment with the FCC. There are already over thousands of filings from other concerned viewers. The ongoing debate over DRM encryption is crucial, and your voice can make a difference.

The New Crossbows & Catapults Disappoints..

As a child of the ’80s, one of my favorite board games was “Crossbows and Catapults.” It was a fun battle game where players built a castle with lego-like blocks and then fired plastic pucks back and forth to knock down the opponent’s castle. The game included rubber-band powered crossbows and catapults to fire off the pucks.

For some reason the game popped in my head the other day and upon searching I happened on the rebooted version that was just released this week at retail! You can see it in action in my latest video.

The new version of “Crossbows and Catapults,” priced at $34.99 (affiliate link), comes with a variety of pieces designed to capture the essence of the original game but in far fewer quantities than the original. Part of the appeal of the original game was having enough wall bricks to come up with some unique and creative build strategies. In this new version players are mostly restricted to a singular castle design.

The new spring-loaded catapult feels close in power to the rubber-band powered original with the added bonus of an angle adjustment that was lacking before. But the new crossbow is a serious miss. It fires by squeezing it together (like a pair of tweezers) to force the puck out. The pucks don’t have much velocity out of the crossbow and I found it was hard for my 8 year old to operate.

They likely moved away from rubber bands due to how easy it was to “hack” the original weapons to be significantly more powerful (and dangerous) by adding more bands. That of course made the game even more fun !

Gameplay itself is straightforward and reminiscent of the original. Players take turns launching pucks at each other’s castles, aiming to knock down their opponent’s structures and soldiers. I did find this new version sturdier than the original (perhaps due to the reduced velocity of the weapons) so each game took much longer to play.

Overall, the new iteration of “Crossbows and Catapults” is a mixed bag. It makes an attempt at bringing back a beloved classic, but falls short due to the lack of creative build options and significantly weakened crossbow weapon. The game would have benefited from being reissued vs. reimagined.

Moving Plex Docker Containers is Easy! Here’s how. (sponsored post)

Last year, I demonstrated how straightforward it is to set up a Plex server on a Synology NAS using Docker. In my latest monthly sponsored Plex video, we explore moving that container off the Synology NAS and onto a Mini PC running Ubuntu Linux.

First, I had to install Docker on the Mini PC, which is running Ubuntu. Installing the Docker Engine was straightforward—just copying and pasting commands into the terminal, as detailed on Docker’s official website. With Docker set up, I moved the Plex container’s files from the Synology NAS, where it had been operating with a small library that included a movie and some TV episodes.

Before transferring, I changed some metadata on the NAS, such as updating a thumbnail for a TV show episode, as a test to ensure that all data will transfer correctly. I stopped the Plex container on the NAS, copied all necessary files—including the Docker compose file, the media files and the folders containing Plex Metadata over to the Mini PC. I then adjusted the Docker compose file to reflect the new file locations on the Mini PC.

With the files in place, I issued a command to spin up the container. Everything started up without a hitch, and all metadata and media were intact and accessible. The flexibility of Docker makes such transitions smooth and reliable. As far as my Plex clients were concerned nothing changed at all!

Next, I wanted to add an external hard drive to the Plex server. I stopped the Plex container, identified the drive’s location on the system, and edited the Docker compose file to include the new media directory from the external drive. After restarting the container, the new media was seamlessly integrated into Plex.

Upgrading the Plex server within Docker is also straightforward. A simple pull command is all that is needed to upgrade to the latest version of the Plex Media Server.

Docker’s portability and ease of use (once you understand how it works of course) make it an excellent choice for self-hosting applications like Plex. Whether starting on a NAS or a Mini PC, Docker allows for straightforward setup, backup, and migration.

You can see some other self hosted projects I’ve played with recently here.

Disclosure: This was a paid sponsorship from Plex however they did not review or approve this content before it was uploaded.

1.7 Million Cut the Cord So Far in 2024 and Comcast isn’t worried. Should they be?

The pace of cord-cutting in the United States continues to accelerate, with two major cable companies losing about 1.7 million TV subscribers in just the last six months according to Cord Cutters News. In my latest video we explore this trend and why Comcast isn’t worried about it.

If things keep on this trend, Cord Cutters News predicts the number of TV cord cutters could reach 3.5 million, adding to the 3 million who did so last year.

Despite the significant loss in TV subscribers, the internet business for cable providers is faring much better – as only 298,000 customers dropped their Internet service too. This indicates that most people are retaining their internet service while cutting TV subscriptions. This surprised me given the aggressive rollout of less expensive and arguably superior fiber optic services throughout the United States. But many customers still lack competitive choices for broadband.

Comcast and other cable companies are also capitalizing on bundling services to retain customers. They offer packages that include internet, mobile phone services, home phone service, and even home security, making it hard for customers to switch to other providers.

In regions with competitive alternatives, such as Connecticut, Comcast faces more challenges. My area, for example, has two fiber optic providers (Frontier and GoNetspeed) on top of fixed wireless services from Verizon and T-Mobile and satellite service from SpaceX Starlink. These options allow customers to save money while enjoying similar or better internet speeds and reliability.

Despite the competition, Comcast remains confident. On a recent earnings call they touted the excess capacity in their network, allowing them to handle increased usage and new customers without major upgrades. By the end of 2025, Comcast expects to be 60% overbuilt. Additionally, a large portion of their customer base subscribes to higher-speed tiers, with many opting for 500 megabits or higher, further enhancing their revenue from internet services.

Comcast is also planning to address the disparity between download and upload speeds through their DOCSIS 4.0 deployment. This upgrade will enable symmetrical service offerings, bringing their performance closer to that of fiber optic providers. In some areas, Comcast already offers high-speed services, such as 10 gigabit symmetrical plans, to compete with fiber providers.

But, as the network becomes more of a commodity, cost of service will likely be the most important factor in choosing a provider. The increased competition in some regions and technological advancements benefit consumers by driving down prices and improving network performance.

As more people cut the TV cord, however, the impact on the TV side of the industry will be significant, affecting retransmission fees and the viability of broadcast TV moving forward.

8bitdo Retro 18 Review – Retro Mechanical Number Pad

I recently got my hands on the 8bitdo Retro 18, a mechanical number pad designed to complement their retro mechanical keyboard. You can see it in action in my latest video.

As someone who was impressed by the keyboard, I was eager to see how this new addition would perform, especially since it addresses the only major shortcoming of the original keyboard—the lack of a number pad.

The Retro 18 maintains the same aesthetic and feel as the keyboard. It connects independently to your computer, using either a Bluetooth connection, a 2.4 GHz dongle, or a USB Type-C connection. But that means if you have the keyboard already connected via USB directly or with the 2.4ghz dongle, you’ll need to dedicate another USB port to the Retro 18. Bluetooth is also supported which is likely the best solution.

Like the keyboard, the Retro 18 comes in four color schemes: the NES version, which matches my NES-style keyboard, as well as schemes inspired by the Japanese Famicom, Commodore 64, and IBM keyboards. This allows users to maintain a cohesive retro look across their devices. My Retro 18 matched up perfectly with the NES style keyboard I already have.

Priced at around $45, the number pad is equipped with Kailh Box White V2 switches, known for their satisfying click and smooth travel. The key switches are hot-swappable, allowing for easy customization, though it’s worth noting that the number pad, like the keyboard, is not backlit. This might be a drawback for those who need to see the keys in low light, but as a touch typist, I didn’t find it to be a significant issue.

Operating the number pad is straightforward. It has an internal battery with a long lifespan between charges, and the display shows the battery level and power input when charging. One of the standout features is its ability to function as a standalone calculator. By pressing the “calc” button, the number pad switches to calculator mode, disabling input to the host device.

For Windows users, there’s a dedicated button to launch the calculator app, though this feature did not work on my Mac. Unfortunately, the number pad doesn’t offer the same level of key customization as the keyboard, which is a missed opportunity for those who like to tailor their setups.

Despite these minor limitations, the 8bitdo Retro 18 is a solid companion to the retro mechanical keyboard. It feels sturdy, has a satisfying typing experience, and includes the bonus of a built-in calculator. For users who need a reliable and aesthetically pleasing number pad, it’s a worthwhile investment.

Acer Aspire Go 15 Slim Review – AG15-31P-3947

My latest video is a review of the budget friendly Acer Aspire Go 15 Slim. This is a low cost laptop from a major manufacturer that costs about the same as some of the more generic cheap laptops you might encounter.

The price on this one varies almost daily. You can see its latest price on Amazon (compensated affiliate link).

The model I reviewed has an Intel i3-N305 processor, a low-end but capable Alder Lake-N chipset typically found in inexpensive mini PCs. It has 8 GB of DDR5 RAM and 128 GB of slow UFS storage, making this one very similar to an HP Chromebook Plus I looked at a few weeks ago. But this one runs Windows and not ChromeOS.

The storage, however, can be expanded by installing an NVMe hard drive, which is a straightforward process. It was not difficult to pop the bottom panel off the computer to access the components beneath.

The 15.6-inch display, an IPS panel with a 1080p resolution, delivers satisfactory viewing angles and color, but is not suited for professional creative work. It looks to me that it’s likely around 300 nits of overall brightness (Acer did not list the display specifications in their product materials). Though not a touchscreen, the display is quite functional for its price range. The integrated webcam, a modest 720p at 30 frames per second, is just adequate for video calls, with a peculiar filter effect.

Weighing in at 3.75 pounds and constructed entirely out of plastic, the laptop feels reasonably durable despite some flex under pressure. The keyboard and trackpad provide a decent user experience, though the keys could be larger. The inclusion of a small number pad might appeal to some users, despite the cramped layout of certain keys. It does not have a keyboard backlight or fingerprint reader.

Port-wise, the Aspire Go 15 Slim offers a full-service USB Type-C port supporting video output and power delivery. Additionally it has a HDMI output (allowing for two simultaneously display outputs), two USB-A ports, and a headphone/microphone jack.

The downward-firing speakers fall short in audio quality, making external headphones or speakers a necessary accessory for music consumption.

In terms of performance, the laptop handles Microsoft Word and web browsing with ease, though playing back 1080p60 YouTube video revealed some dropped frames, likely an issue that could be fixed with future driver updates. The Speedometer benchmark placed it on par with similarly specced Chromebooks, making it a competent performer for basic tasks.

Battery life spans about 7 to 8 hours under typical usage, though more demanding activities will drain it faster. Gaming tests with older titles like GTA V and PS2 emulations showed acceptable performance at low settings, indicating that while newer games will struggle, there’s plenty of opportunity for older games to run well.

Benchmarks on 3DMark Time Spy revealed performance levels consistent with budget devices, outpaced by older Ryzen processors but still sufficient for less demanding tasks. The fan noise, though constant, remains relatively unobtrusive, helping keep the device cool.

A test with the latest Ubuntu version indicated partial Linux compatibility, with the Mediatek Wi-Fi and Bluetooth card drivers not yet supported.

Overall, the Acer Aspire Go 15 Slim presents a solid option for those looking for a reliable, budget-friendly laptop with better options support versus lesser-known brands.

Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 Review

The Cambridge Melomania P100 headphones, priced at $279 (compensated affiliate link), sound spectacular – as long as you don’t move around too much. You can see more in my latest review.

Although I’m not an expert audiophile, I primarily listen to lossless audio, and the P100’s sound quality truly impressed me. The headphones feature 40mm drivers, providing a balanced range of sound with punchy bass when needed and clear precision across other frequencies. I left the equalizer on its default flat setting, as suggested by Cambridge, and was satisfied with the results.

The headphones are comfortable, featuring synthetic vegan leather ear cups that fit well over my ears and effectively block out ambient noise even without active noise cancellation. The fabric headband is comfortable, and I experienced no significant fatigue after wearing the headphones for several hours. However, the tight fit made it a bit challenging to wear glasses comfortably.

Control-wise, the P100s are straightforward. A physical switch turns the headphones on and off, and pairing via Bluetooth is seamless. They support Bluetooth 5.3 and can connect to two devices simultaneously. Media controls and noise cancellation settings are easily accessible, and the headphones include a Qualcomm QCC 3084 chip for audio processing, which I found satisfactory despite being an entry-level processor.

One drawback is the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack, although the included USB-C cables (including one with a 3.5mm headphone connector) provide alternatives for connecting to devices. The headphones support lossless audio formats such as aptX Lossless over bluetooth, making them ideal for high-quality music listening when connected directly to a device that supports wireless lossless.

The battery life is impressive, with claims of up to 100 hours without active noise cancellation and 60 hours with it.

However, using the headphones while walking revealed an issue: an annoying clicking sound caused by the noise cancellation picking up my footsteps. This problem, reported by other users as well, makes the P100s less suitable for active use. Even when the noise cancellation is disabled I heard the footsteps resonating through the headphones.

The Cambridge Audio companion app runs on iPhone and Android devices. It offers basic but useful features, including firmware updates, graphic equalizer and customization of noise cancellation settings. The app also includes a gaming mode to reduce audio latency, which might be useful for some users.

Overall, the Cambridge Melomania P100 headphones provide excellent audio quality and comfort, making them a solid choice for stationary music listening or long flights. However, for those who like to move around with their headphones, the noise cancellation issues may be a significant drawback.

Disclosure: The headphones came in free of charge through the Amazon Vine program. However no other compensation was received and this content was not reviewed or approved by Amazon or the manufacturer before upload.

Netflix Does Games? Some of them are pretty good!

I recently explored Netflix’s venture into the gaming industry, discovering that it offers a variety of games as part of its streaming subscription plan. I take a look at their offerings on mobile, TV and the web in my latest video.

This all started with an article in Kotaku, which looked at Netflix’s plan to add 80 new games this year to its existing library of 100. Unlike many mobile games, Netflix’s offerings do not feature ads or in-app purchases, resembling the model of Apple Arcade and Google Play Pass. Existing Netflix customers can download and play the games without any additional fees.

In their second quarter earnings call last week, Netflix said they are focusing on developing games based on their popular intellectual properties (IP), such as a previously released Stranger Things game. These games tend to be narrative-driven and less reliant on quick reflexes, making them well-suited for touch screens.

Navigating Netflix’s game offerings varies between platforms. On Android, there is a dedicated games tab, while on iPhone, games are currently on a “shelf” that is mixed in with the streaming media content. Downloading a game from the Netflix app takes the user to the phone’s app store where it will install like any other app. Users can also download the games directly from each platform’s app store too.

One impressive feature is the cross-platform cloud syncing. For instance, I started playing Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Shredder’s Revenge (compensated affiliate link) on an Android phone and was able to pick up my game seamlessly on an iPhone. However, it’s important to note that if a game is removed from Netflix, the save files will not be compatible with versions of these games purchased separately.

Netflix’s TV interface for games is still developing. While mobile games cannot be downloaded on TV devices, Netflix offers TV-specific games that run within the Netflix app, controlled via a phone app. These games, such as Rocket, are simpler but still enjoyable.

In the web browser, Netflix offers the same games available on TV, which are web-based and apparently streamed from Netflix’s servers. Although these games look and play well, they currently do not support game controllers. An example is Infernax, a side-scrolling platformer reminiscent of Shovel Knight (compensated affiliate link).

Overall, Netflix’s foray into gaming is diverse and still evolving. It offers a unique blend of mobile, TV, and web-based games, making it worth exploring. If you haven’t yet tried Netflix games, it might be time to dive in and see what’s available.

HP Sprocket Panorama Review

I recently got my hands on the HP Sprocket Panorama, an intriguing little gadget designed to print long strips of photos using special thermal Zink paper. This compact printer, like other models in the Sprocket lineup, eliminates the need for ink cartridges, relying instead on its unique paper to produce images.

You can see my quick review of it over at Flip.

The printer costs about $129 (compensated affiliate link) but often goes on sale.

When unboxing, I found the paper supplied on a small spool. While the amount included isn’t extensive, it’s enough to get started and run a few prints. Through my phone, I could design custom prints, choosing lengths from half an inch up to nine inches. I decided to go with a middle ground of five inches for my test.

The design process is quite user-friendly. I could add borders, graphical elements, photos, stickers, and text to create my desired layout. However, one limitation I noticed was the inability to place borders behind the photos. This requires careful alignment of elements to achieve the desired look.

Once satisfied with my creation, I hit the print button. The printing process is relatively slow, comparable to other Sprocket models. The quality is what one would expect from other Zink-based thermal printers – not exceptional, but decent enough for fun and casual use. The prints do have a tendency to curl, possibly due to humidity, and the color fidelity isn’t perfect.

An additional feature of the Sprocket prints is their sticky backing, which can revealed after pulling off the backing on the paper. This makes it a handy tool for scrapbooking and other creative projects.

One thing to note is that unlike other Sprocket printers, the Panorama model must remain plugged in, as it lacks a battery.

Overall, the HP Sprocket Panorama offers a fun way to print and customize photos, especially for those who enjoy scrapbooking or simply want to add a personal touch to their prints. While the quality may not satisfy professional photographers, it provides an enjoyable and creative experience for casual users.

Camp Snap Digital Camera Review

The Camp Snap digital camera is an intriguing device reminiscent of old disposable film cameras, yet it is digital, reusable, and rechargeable. It offers a simple photography experience featuring no screen and only a 80’s style counter on the back to indicate how many photos has been taken.

See my quick review over at Flip to see it in action.

The camera features a fixed focus lens, producing images with a built-in filter that cannot be altered without having to flash its firmware. However, if you enjoy its unique look, it’s straightforward to use. Taking a photo involves simply pressing the shutter button, which then saves the image to the onboard storage and updates the photo count displayed on the back.

Viewing photos requires connecting the camera to a computer or other device via a USB port located under a small gasket. The camera presents itself as an external USB storage device when connected allowing easy access to your pictures. I was even able to transfer photos directly to my smartphone.

While it includes a flash, it isn’t particularly bright, yet still functional in various lighting conditions. Flash settings can be adjusted with a switch on the back of the camera.

Internally, the Camp Snap houses a 4 GB SD card, though it is secured with screws, making it difficult to replace. The rechargeable battery, which is charged via the USB-C port, can last for around 500 images before needing a recharge.

Overall, the Camp Snap is basic in its functionality but offers a charmingly simple way to capture moments. For those looking to reduce the complexity of their photography or enjoy a nostalgic experience, this camera presents a fun and practical option.

Android’s AirTag Alternative Falls a Bit Short – Pebblebee Clip Review

I’ve been closely following the rollout of Google’s version of Apple’s “Find My Device” network and recently had the opportunity to review one of the first products to support this ecosystem: the Pebblebee Clip. You can see how it works in my latest review.

This device, retailing for about $30 (compensated affiliate link), aims to bring Android users a tracking solution akin to Apple’s AirTag. In theory, any updated Android phone can detect these trackers and report their location back to Google. However, my initial tests revealed some shortcomings.

Setting up the Pebblebee Clip was not as seamless as expected. I had to uninstall and reinstall the Find My Device app on my Google Pixel 8a to get it working. The device pairs over Bluetooth and features a rechargeable battery, a departure from the replaceable watch batteries used in many trackers, including AirTags. The battery life is advertised to last about a year, though this will vary based on usage.

One significant feature of the Pebblebee Clip is its anti-stalking capability. Google mandates that these devices notify people if they are being followed by a tag not in the owner’s possession. This feature is supposed to work across both Android and iOS devices. However, in my tests, it did not function as intended. When my wife carried the tag around with her iPhone for the better part of the day, she received no notifications, indicating a possible issue with the current implementation.

The user interface for the Pebblebee Clip allows for tracking the device, playing a sound to locate it, and even features a light to assist in finding it in the dark. It also provides a hot and cold directional indicator to help users find the tag when they are close by, although it lacks the precision of Apple’s ultra-wideband technology.

A significant limitation of the Google network is the default setting on Android phones. By default, the phones only participate in the network in “high-traffic” areas where there are a number of other Android phones present in the environment. This setting severely limits the effectiveness of the network in suburban or rural areas. When my wife took the tag to various locations where presumably other Android users would be present, including a grocery store and an art show, I received no location updates until she returned home.

Furthermore, the Pebblebee Clip lacks a “left behind” notification feature, which is present in Apple’s system. This feature alerts users when they move away from their tagged items, such as a bag. Additionally, the RFID scanning feature, which is supposed to allow users to tap the tag against their phone to get the owner’s information, did not work on either my Google or Apple devices in my testing.

Overall, while the Pebblebee Clip has some promising features, it falls short due to the limitations of Google’s network. The default settings and lack of universal device reporting significantly hinder its effectiveness, especially in less densely populated areas. For those in urban environments, it may perform adequately, but for others, Apple’s AirTag remains a more reliable option. Google’s network needs to be more robust and universally accessible to truly compete. Until then, the Pebblebee Clip is an interesting device that highlights the potential and current limitations of Google’s “Find My Device” network.

Many users wrote in to say that I “forgot” Samsung Tags that also have a similar find my device network. I didn’t forget and know it exists.. The point here is that Google is building a network that should work across the entire Android ecosystem – not just Samsung. And it falls short.

Sandisk Pro G40 Thunderbolt SSD Review

The Sandisk Pro G40 portable SSD is marketed towards creative professionals and stands out thanks to its Thunderbolt & USB 4.0 compatibility, promising multiple gigabytes per second of transfer rates. But it also is (mostly) backwards compatible to slower USB devices that lack Thunderbolt technology.

I put it through its paces in my most recent review.

Because it’s a “professional” product this drive comes it at a higher price point, about $174 for the 1TB version (compensated affiliate link).

The drive’s build quality is impressive, featuring a solid, rubberized metal design with a grippy bottom, common in other SanDisk drives. It is IP68 weatherproof, making it resistant to splashes, though users should avoid exposing it to harsh weather when plugged in.

It comes with a short Thunderbolt 3 cable USB-C cable which will also work on computers not equipped with USB-C. Other cables, like USB-C to USB-A cables will work as well but those will need to be purchased separately.

Performance tests on a Thunderbolt-equipped Windows computer showed it achieving over 2.4 gigabytes per second in read and write speeds, maintaining this without thermal drop-offs or cache issues. For optimal performance, it’s crucial to connect to the correct port, identified by the Thunderbolt or USB 4.0 icon, as using a standard USB port significantly reduces speeds.

The CrystalDiskMark benchmark further highlighted its strengths in sequential and random reads and writes, suggesting potential for PC gaming. Comparisons with other USB-C-based drives such as the SanDisk Extreme Pro and Samsung T9 showed the Pro G40’s superior performance in Thunderbolt mode. Speeds were comparable to competitors when not connected to the Thunderbolt, however.

The SanDisk Pro G40 SSD contains an off-the-shelf WD Black SN850 NVMe (compensated affiliate link) drive inside its enclosure.

Notably, the Pro G40 does not work with iPhones, which limits its utility despite its potential for high bitrate, lossless video formats. Attempts to use it with other phones also failed, possibly due to power draw issues, making it suitable primarily for computers.

For Windows users, achieving full performance requires enabling write caching in the drive’s settings. I outlined those steps at the 6:12 mark in the video review. This extra step is unnecessary for Mac users, where the drive works at full speed out of the box.

While the Pro G40 is compatible with game consoles, its high performance can’t be utilized, making it an impractical choice for that purpose. However, for PC gaming and professional creative work, it offers excellent performance akin to internal drives. Despite its limitations with mobile devices, the Pro G40 is a compelling option for those needing a fast, reliable external drive.

Eufy e340 Doorbell Review

My quest for the perfect wireless subscription-free doorbell has been a long one.. I’ve looked at Blink, Wyze, Google Nest and a few others but the Eufy e340 is one that I think is the best of the bunch. You can see my full review here.

It currently is selling at its Prime Day sales price at $119 (compensated affiliate link) but is normally $179. An indoor chime costs an additional $39.

One of the standout features of the Eufy E340 is its dual-camera setup. It includes a front-facing camera and a second camera aimed downward to monitor packages left at the doorstep. This design is particularly useful for keeping an eye on deliveries, ensuring that packages are not missed or stolen.

The doorbell stores footage locally, boasting 8GB of internal storage. If more space is needed, users can opt for the chime accessory, which includes an SD card slot for additional storage. There is also compatibility with Eufy’s hub for broader integration with other security devices.

The doorbell’s installation is straightforward, and it includes a secure mounting mechanism to deter theft. Users can also angle the doorbell using an included bracket for optimal coverage. The device operates efficiently in various lighting conditions, featuring both infrared and color night vision modes. The infrared mode uses invisible light to illuminate the scene, while the color mode employs visible lights for a clearer picture at night. You can see examples of both modes in the video above.

Audio quality is another strong point. The doorbell includes a microphone for clear audio recordings and a speaker for two-way communication. This setup allows users to interact with visitors or delivery personnel directly through their smartphones, providing real-time communication without the need for a walkie-talkie style exchange.

Battery life is impressive, lasting several months under low to moderate usage. The device also supports direct power connections if existing doorbell wiring is available, which helps maintain the battery charge indefinitely.

The Eufy app, available on both Android and iOS, provides a comprehensive interface for managing the doorbell. Users can view live footage, review recorded events, and adjust settings directly from the app. The app’s AI offer reliable human detection while ignoring non-essential movements or trees blowing in the wind or animals. This reduces false alerts and enhances the overall user experience.

One of the advanced features is the “Delivery Guard,” which tracks packages left at the door and can also activate a deterrent alert when a package is detected and someone walks up to the door. Users can also receive alerts if a package remains unattended for too long. The familiar faces feature allows users to upload photos of known individuals, enabling the doorbell to recognize and log visits from these people.

All in, the Eufy E340 Dual Camera Wireless Doorbell is a well-rounded, high-performing device that excels in key areas such as video quality, audio clarity, battery life, and smart features. Its dual-camera design and robust app integration make it a versatile choice for anyone seeking a reliable, subscription-free doorbell solution. For those in search of a dependable and cost-effective security addition to their home, this doorbell is worth serious consideration.

Disclosure: I paid for the doorbell with my own funds.

New Amazon Echo Spot 2024 Review – Amazon’s smart alarm clock

While Amazon does regularly update their Echo devices, it’s often hard to discern one version from the next these days as most are more revisions versus something totally new. But the other day Amazon released their latest Echo Spot that looks and operates a little differently than the others. You can see more in my latest review.

Unlike the more versatile Echo Show, the Echo Spot is being marketed primarily as a smart alarm clock. This device lacks a camera and has a more limited display functionality, but at the same time it’s not displaying ads to the user as a means of subsidizing its cost.

The design is reminiscent of other Echo devices, with a cut-off sphere look. It comes with a low resolution display that is mostly dedicated to showing the time and weather conditions. Unlike the Echo Show, it cannot display video footage from security cameras or provide the same depth of visual information. However, it will provide basic visual responses to certain queries, such as showing the weather or the current music track playing.

While it is capable of performing many of the same tasks as other Echo devices, the limited display means it might not be as suitable for tasks that require more visual information, like kitchen timers. The Echo Spot can also handle multiple countdown timers, although the small display makes it challenging to manage several at once.

Amazon offers some limited customization of the clock face, including choosing from a few different layouts for the clock display along with the base color it uses. The clock faces can be adjusted using the touch functionality of the display but it’s much easier to do it via the Alexa app.

Amazon also built in a night mode that dims the display and switches to a red color for the clock to avoid disrupting sleep. Night hours can be set within the app. The alarm clock functionality is also intuitive; you can set alarms by voice and snooze them with a simple tap on the top of the device. There are different alarm tones available, including some celebrity voices, which can add a fun element to waking up.

In terms of audio, the speaker on the Echo Spot is decent, offering a richer sound than the entry-level Echo Dot but not quite at the level of higher-end audio devices. It’s suitable for background music or podcasts, especially when getting ready in the morning.

The physical controls on the top include a mute button for the microphone and volume buttons. The Echo Spot’s microphones are quite sensitive and can pick up commands from across a room, making it a convenient addition to a bedroom or office.

Overall, the Amazon Echo Spot serves well as a smart alarm clock, offering basic smart assistant functionalities without the added complexity or privacy concerns of a camera. It integrates smoothly into Amazon’s ecosystem and provides a balance of features for those looking for a simple, voice-controlled device for their bedside table.

An Interview With the Last Floppy Disk Retailer!

Japan has officially banned the use of floppy disks in its government operations. This move comes as part of a broader effort by the country’s new Digital Transformation Minister, Taro Kono, who has declared a war on outdated technology. According to a recent Ars Technica article, the Japanese government required obsolete media formats, including floppy disks, CD-ROMs, and even mini-discs for many official filings.

In my latest video we take a look at the Japanese law and look at why floppy disks persist as a storage medium over a decade after the last one was made. We also have a fun interview with Tom Persky, owner of floppydisk.com, who is one of the last remaining floppy disk retailers.

In the United States, the use of floppy disks persisted in critical areas longer than one might expect. For example, until 2019, the US nuclear arsenal relied on 8-inch floppy disks, which were eventually replaced by secure digital storage solutions. Floppy disks also remain essential in certain private sector areas, particularly in aviation, where some Boeing 747s update their software using 3.5-inch floppy disks.

Despite their obsolescence, floppy disks are not entirely dead. They are still available for purchase online, often from niche suppliers like Tom Persky’s Floppydisk.com. Persky’s business, which started as a software development house, morphed into a disk duplication service in the 1990s. Now it thrives by catering to a dwindling yet persistent market for floppy disks. As retail shelf space for these disks has vanished, Persky’s large inventory and online presence have made him a go-to source for individuals and businesses needing floppy disks.

Floppydisk.com supplies both new old stock and repurposed disks. Persky’s stock comes from various sources, including large purchases from countries like South Africa, Argentina, and Brazil. He also provides a recycling service for used disks, repurposing those that pass reformatting tests and selling others for artistic or promotional uses.

The clientele for floppy disks is diverse. About 10% of Persky’s customers are computer hobbyists looking to revive old games or systems. He says the bulk of his business comes from industrial customers who rely on floppy disks to operate machines built decades ago. These machines, designed to last for decades, still use floppy disks to ingest data for automation.

One common concern about floppy disks is their longevity. Persky notes that disks manufactured during the peak production years of the 1980s and 1990s are generally reliable. In contrast, disks made towards the end of their manufacturing run may be less so. Interestingly, well-maintained floppy disks can sometimes be more dependable than other storage media like USB drives or CDs, which can suffer from issues like “disc rot” over time. I have a few CD’s that I burned in the late 90’s that are rotted out yet many of my 40 year old Apple II disks still read perfectly.

Floppydisk.com also offers data transfer services, helping customers recover old data from floppy disks, such as early drafts of books, financial records, and treasured photographs.

While the future of floppy disks is finite, given that no new disks are being produced, Persky remains optimistic. He acknowledges that the business may not last forever, but is confident that the current inventory will suffice for the foreseeable future.