Tag: review

GMKTec EVO-T1 Mini PC Review – With Intel Core Ultra 9

I recently spent some time testing out the GMKTec EVO-T1, which sits at the higher end of the mini PC spectrum. You can see it in action in my latest video.

It’s larger than most of the mini PCs I usually look at, but that extra size supports a more robust cooling system, allowing it to house an Intel Core Ultra 9 processor—the Ultra 9 285H specifically. With 16 cores (six performance, eight efficiency, and two low-power), it offers a lot of CPU capacity for a Mini PC.

As configured, it retails for $999 on GMKtek’s website (compensated affiliate link) and includes 64GB of DDR5-5600 RAM and a 1TB NVMe drive. A barebones version is also available for $899, but the fully-loaded configuration is a better value right now. For those buying on Amazon (compensated affiliate link), it’s worth hunting for a coupon link to bring the price in line with the direct sale.

The Evo T1’s upgradability was a highlight. It supports up to 128GB of RAM and has three PCIe 4.0 NVMe slots. While the build quality feels a bit more “plasticky” than some of their earlier models—likely to accommodate the vapor chamber for cooling—the internal layout is straightforward and accessible.

Port selection is generous. On the front, there are three USB-A 3.2 ports, a USB-C port with display output, and a headphone jack. The back offers two 2.5G Ethernet ports using Realtek controllers, two USB 2.0 ports, HDMI, DisplayPort, a USB 4/Thunderbolt port, another headphone jack, and an Oculink port for high-speed external GPU connectivity. The included 150W GaN power supply is compact and external.

One setup note: by default, the system runs in a balanced 54W power mode. I switched it to 70W performance mode in the BIOS, which unlocked noticeably better performance without thermal throttling. There’s also a “fan mode” button on top, but that’s just to change the LED lighting color—not the actual fan speed or performance.

Out of the box, the PC came with a fully activated version of Windows 11 Pro. It was fast and responsive in basic use and handled 4K60 YouTube playback with only a single dropped frame at the start. Benchmarks landed where expected, with a Browserbench.org Speedometer test score of 35.5. It’s worth noting that Apple’s Mac Mini with the M4 chip edges out this machine in browser performance, but from an Intel and Windows standpoint, it delivers solid results.

The T1 shipped with a preinstalled app called “AI PC,” which runs a stripped down version of DeepSeek—a large language model—locally. It ran on the GPU, which provided better performance than when I tried the same model using Ollama on the CPU. Still, I was cautious about this preinstalled software and opted to run several malware scans, all of which came back clean. I’d still recommend using open-source tools like Ollama for local AI workloads.

For video editing, DaVinci Resolve handled simple 4K60 edits smoothly, although more complex effects introduced some slowdowns. An external GPU might help here, and the Oculink port makes that possible. Gaming performance was respectable for a mini PC with integrated graphics. No Man’s Sky and Cyberpunk 2077 were playable at 1080p on low settings, staying in the 45–60 fps range depending on the scene.

On the 3DMark Time Spy test, the system scored 4,180, with the CPU performance notably stronger than the Core Ultra 7 I tested on a laptop previously. Thermals held up well even under stress, with consistent performance and quiet fan operation. Power consumption under load peaked around 90W, while idle usage hovered around 12 to 15W.

I also tested Linux compatibility using Ubuntu. The system ran well overall, though Wi-Fi and Bluetooth weren’t detected despite using an Intel AX201 chipset. That could be a temporary driver issue. For server use, though, the system’s NVMe slots and efficient idle power draw make it a strong candidate.

Despite its higher price tag, the Evo T1 packs a lot of power and flexibility. Enthusiasts looking for a machine to experiment with in a home lab or as a local AI box might find this an interesting option.

Disclosure: GMKTec provided the Mini PC to the channel free of charge. However they did not review or approve this content before it was uploaded and no other compensation was received. All opinions are my own.

Synology’s Beestation Plus Makes for a Simple Transcoding Plex Server

The Synology BeeStation Plus (compensated affiliate link) is a personal cloud server that offers a stripped-down take on Synology’s usual network-attached storage experience. Unlike their more robust NAS systems, the BeeStation line focuses on just a few core functions—file syncing across devices and photo backup from phones. It’s more or less a homegrown alternative to services like Dropbox or Google Drive, and this new Plus model adds something the original lacked: the ability to run a Plex server.

In my latest video, we take a look at this new BeeStation performs as a Plex server.

That Plex capability is what drew my attention this time. I reviewed the original BeeStation last year, and not much has changed outside of this new functionality. The interface, the photo and file syncing—all of that remains the same. What’s different is under the hood: more storage, faster hardware, and just enough headroom to make media serving viable.

The BeeStation Plus comes in at a price roughly double that of the original model. It’s also just slightly less expensive than Synology’s newer DS225+ NAS when configured with storage. The DS225+ shares the same Intel Celeron J4125 processor found here.

The BeeStation Plus includes 8TB of built-in Synology-branded storage running at 7200 RPM, compared to 4TB at 5400 RPM on the original. There’s also a bump from 1GB to 4GB of RAM.

From a design standpoint, you get basic connectivity: Gigabit Ethernet, USB-A and USB-C ports for external backup drives, and a fan that’s quiet during operation. Unfortunately, it lacks 2.5-gigabit Ethernet, which is now available on that aforementioned DS225+.

The Plex Media Server is installed through the web control panel. It’s not the latest version—Synology seems to vet versions before distributing them—but the process is pretty painless. You’ll need to walk through the usual Plex setup steps manually, including mapping your media directories one by one. The BeeStation Plus creates default folders for things like movies and TV shows, but you have to point Plex to them yourself.

Once it’s up and running, Plex behaves as expected. I tested it by playing a BluRay MKV rip of Back to the Future from my phone over Wi-Fi and had it transcode a 4K HDR10 file down to 1080p at 8Mbps with tone mapping. The hardware handled that without issue, using only about 20% of available system resources thanks to Intel’s Quick Sync technology.

One catch: hardware transcoding requires a Plex Pass. It’s a separate purchase—not bundled with the BeeStation—and available either as a subscription or one-time payment. Without it, Plex will still work fine on your local network if you don’t need transcoding, but you will need to pay to stream outside the home.

Transferring media files to the BeeStation is easiest over a local SMB share. You can access the device through your network like any other NAS box, and I was getting about 100MB/s transfer speeds, which lines up with expectations for gigabit Ethernet.

So what’s the verdict? The BeeStation Plus works. It’s a more capable version of the original, and for someone new to Plex who wants a simple, all-in-one box, it might be a decent starting point. But at this price point, it sits in a weird middle ground. For casual users, the original BeeStation might still be enough if they don’t need the Plex server. It’s possible Synology will add more app support to this device in the future, and if they do, the extra processing power here will help. But for now, the BeeStation Plus feels like a bridge between the simple and sophisticated—and that may limit its appeal.

iPad Mini Review – Gen 7 / A17 Pro Version

I picked up the latest iPad Mini—the one with the A17 Pro chip that came out in October (compensated affilate link) —during a Prime Day sale a few months after its release. It wasn’t something I was initially planning on buying, but I started flying lessons and needed a bigger screen for ForeFlight, the aviation app I’ve been using. Just about every pilot I’ve encountered uses the iPad Mini, and it made sense to follow suit when I saw it on sale.

In this video, I take a look at the new iPad Mini and see what it can do. I was surprised that it has performance and capabilities that rivals some of the pre-M1 iPad Pros.

The device looks very much like the previous iPad Mini, which came out four years ago. The bezels haven’t changed, and they definitely feel dated by today’s standards. That said, the internals are better—more powerful processor, more memory, and increased base storage. I went with the 128 GB Wi-Fi model, which is enough for my needs. The starting price is $499, but I paid $379 on sale. Apple also offers 256 and 512 GB versions, and you can opt for cellular connectivity if needed.

I did get some questions about why I went with the non GPS unit if I’m using it in a plane. The reason is that we use a device called a Foreflight Sentry that provides GPS and ADS-B data to the iPad. It’s a pretty neat device. During our preflight I connect the iPad to the sentry via Wi-Fi and it’s up and running.

Inside, the iPad Mini is powered by the A17 Pro chip—essentially the same as the one in the iPhone 15 Pro, minus a GPU core. While that technically means it’s slightly less powerful graphically, I didn’t notice much of a difference in real-world use. The screen is 8.3 inches with a 2266 by 1488 resolution. It’s not OLED, but the contrast and black levels are still quite good. It runs at 60 Hz, so if you’re used to 120 Hz displays, the difference in smoothness will be noticeable. I’m not too bothered by it personally.

The hardware is solid. It weighs about 293 grams and feels well built with a glass front and a metal back. I added a MagSafe ring (compensated affiliate link) to the back for easier mounting in my studio and in the cockpit. It won’t wirelessly charge that way, but I mostly use the ring for mounting, not charging.

There’s a single USB-C port at the bottom, and stereo speakers that intelligently shift left and right depending on the orientation. Audio quality is passable—good for conference calls but not ideal for music playback. For better audio, external headphones or speakers are recommended, but note there is no headphone jack. The iPad supports the 2nd generation Apple Pencil, as well as the new USB-C Pencil and the Pencil Pro.

On the back is a 12 MP camera with a 1.8 aperture. It shoots 4K at 60 fps and can do slow-motion at 1080p 240 fps. There’s no optical stabilization, just digital, but video looks good and still images are sharp with natural bokeh, though there’s no portrait mode. The front-facing camera is also 12 MP but limited to 1080p video and isn’t great in low light. It does though have a very wide field of view and supports Center Stage for video calls, tracking you as you move.

Performance is snappy. Web browsing, app launching, and multitasking all work well. Split screen functionality is available, though the screen size makes it a bit tight. It supports Wi-Fi 6E and performed well in speed tests on my network.

I was surprised to find that Final Cut Pro runs on this iPad. I tested it using Apple’s sample project, and it played back 4K HDR footage smoothly. It’s not the easiest device to edit on due to screen size, but it worked. The full USB-C port also makes it possible to connect external displays, keyboards, and other peripherals, which makes it more useful for tasks like presentations. I ran a Keynote presentation off it without issue in my video.

Gaming is another strong suit. I tested Fortnite which ran at a solid 60 fps. Benchmark results put its performance in the same league as the iPhone 15 Pro Max, and even comparable to a Windows handheld like the ASUS ROG Ally in some respects. That said, it does get warm under load and will throttle performance after sustained use. It’s worth noting that thermal throttling didn’t appear to impact my gaming session significantly but I did see performance losses with my benchmark tests.

Battery life varies by use. For web browsing and video playback, expect 8–10 hours. With more intensive applications like gaming, that drops to around 4 hours or less. It charges fairly quickly and, unlike iPhones, still includes a charger in the box.

I wasn’t planning to rejoin the iPad world, especially since my larger one doesn’t get much use, but this device feels right for what I need it to do. My wife has been using the prior Mini for a couple of years now and still loves it. For a smaller iPad, this one does a lot more than I expected. It’s not just about size—it’s also about capability.

GMKTec G10 Mini PC Review

In my latest Mini PC review video, I take a look at the new GMKTec G10. This one is on the lower-end of the price scale (compensated affiliate link), and reminded me a bit of their other low cost machine G3 Plus, which I liked for its low cost and practical design. The G10 comes in a bit higher in price but swaps in a Ryzen processor, specifically the older 3500U that can perform a little better in some applications.

My G10 review unit came with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage, and it’s easy to open up and upgrade. There are two NVMe slots inside, and the unit can support up to 64GB of RAM and 16TB of total storage—though you’ll need to work around a pretty tight layout. One NVMe slot overlaps the RAM modules, which makes things a little cramped. It’s all housed in a plastic case, nothing premium, but serviceable.

On the front are two 5Gbps USB-A ports and a headphone/mic jack. Around back, there’s a USB-C port that supports data, video, and power delivery, along with a second USB-C port that’s power-only. There’s also USB 2.0, 2.5Gb Ethernet, HDMI, and DisplayPort outputs. Combined with the USB-C video output, you can run three independent displays. Wi-Fi is limited to Wi-Fi 5, and the Ethernet and wireless chips use Realtek controllers.

Right out of the box, performance is a bit underwhelming. By default, the BIOS is set to a balanced mode that limits the processor to 15W. Switching to the high-performance mode bumps that up to 35W, which improves performance, but thermal issues start cropping up. I ran a 3DMark stress test and initially got poor results—even in performance mode—until I manually configured the fan to run at 100%. With the fan running constantly, I got much better stability and higher benchmark scores. It’s louder than I’d like, but not the worst I’ve seen.

Windows 11 Pro comes pre-installed and activated. In high-performance mode, it feels snappier than Intel N150-based mini PCs, especially at 4K60. Browsing is responsive, though I noticed some dropped frames when playing back 4K60 video from YouTube. It eventually smooths out, but not quite to the level I’ve seen from newer Intel chips in the same price range.

Benchmarking with browserbench.org’s Speedometer test gave me a score of 11.2 in performance mode and 7.63 in balanced mode. It does beat the N150 when pushed in the higher TDP, but just barely.

Gaming is possible at the low end. GTA V at 720p and minimum settings averaged around 45 to 50 frames per second. Emulation performance was mixed. PS2 titles like Burnout Revenge didn’t run very smoothly, even with performance settings. Older consoles and retro-style games should run fine, but don’t expect this to handle more demanding emulators consistently.

In the Time Spy benchmark, the G10 scored 756 in performance mode and 394 in balanced mode. On paper, that’s better than the N150, but in practice, I saw smoother emulation on the Intel system. I suspect that the older CPU architecture and slower RAM are contributing to that gap.

Linux support seems solid. I tried Ubuntu 25.04 and had working Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, audio, and video. An earlier version of Ubuntu didn’t detect Ethernet, but the latest build corrected that. Linux felt more responsive than Windows in balanced mode, likely due to lower system overhead.

Idle power consumption came in at around 11–12 watts in balanced mode and 20 watts in performance mode. For those thinking of using it as a low-cost server, it could work, but you’ll want to put it somewhere where the fan noise won’t be a annoyance.

Overall there are some compromises with this device. Thermals need hands-on tweaking, and the older chip architecture shows in areas like video playback and emulation. I’d probably still recommend the Intel N150-based mini PCs for most people, especially if your budget is tight and you’re looking for a quieter and more polished experience. Still, for the right use case—like a small home server or a Linux box—the G10 has its place.

Disclosure: GMKTec sent the Mini PC to the channel free of charge. They did not review or approve this video prior to uploading, no additional compensation was received, and all opinions are my own.

Free App Hidden Gem: STARSS – RSS Reader with a Star Trek LCARS Interface!

I stumbled across something recently that made my inner Star Trek nerd do a double-take. If you’re like me—middle-aged and grew up watching The Next Generation—chances are your iPad mini reminds you of the data pads the crew used aboard the Enterprise. But of course, Apple’s default interface doesn’t exactly scream LCARS. That’s where an app called “STARSS” comes in.

See it in action in my latest video.

I found this while browsing around and had never heard of it before, despite the fact that it’s apparently been on the App Store for over 17 years. It’s free, and was created by Christopher Kriens, who as far as I can tell hasn’t made any other iOS apps. What makes STARSS unique is that it turns your iPad—or iPhone—into a fully functional LCARS-style RSS reader. It’s more than just a nostalgic interface toy. It actually has some function.

When you launch the app, you’re greeted with that familiar Starfleet color palette and UI structure. It pulls in RSS feeds and displays articles as if they were Starfleet communiqués. It even includes audio effects—when you share an article, for instance, it plays the communicator chirp. The navigation is pure LCARS: no scrolling with your fingers here. Instead, you tap buttons labeled “ascend” and “descend” to move through lists. To read an article, you select it and tap “access article,” which opens a summary. You can then hit “access web” to launch the article in a built-in browser.

There’s a certain charm in how committed the app is to the Star Trek aesthetic. Features like “red alert” mode, weapon systems with sound effects, and a “subspace scan” button add to the illusion. If you really want to immerse yourself, you can even enable ambient bridge sounds that play while the app is open.

Underneath the LCARS exterior is a lightweight but capable RSS reader. It doesn’t offer all the bells and whistles like tags or folders, but it gets the job done. You can add new feeds by searching for a site and hitting “engage.” I tried it with my own blog and had no problem getting it to work. Articles show up in the reader with summaries or full text, depending on how the site publishes its feed.

There’s also iCloud sync support, basic text size controls, and even an option to trigger red alert mode if you drop your iPad. It’s clearly not meant to replace more advanced RSS readers, but it doesn’t need to. For Star Trek fans looking for a functional novelty, it lands in the sweet spot.

STARSS is free and still available on the App Store. It might not be new, but it was new to me—and sometimes that’s even better.

Find an iPad on Amazon (compensated affiliate link).

The ASUS Prime Day Gaming Laptop: ROG Strix G16 Review

I’ve been spending some time with the ASUS ROG Strix G16 (compensated affiliate link), a gaming laptop that’s been on sale for Prime Day and likely will pop up in other sales throughout the year. This is a mid-tier option in the ROG lineup, and ASUS sent it over on loan for a closer look.

You can see it in action in my latest review.

It’s powered by an Intel Core i7-14650HX—an older CPU, but still very capable given the rest of the system—and it’s paired with an Nvidia RTX 5060 GPU with 8GB of VRAM, running at up to 115 watts. The display is a 16-inch 1920×1200 panel in a 16:10 aspect ratio. It’s not especially high-res, but it runs at 165Hz with G-Sync and a 3ms response time. I’d estimate brightness at around 350 nits. While not the brightest screen out there, it holds up well in everyday use and looks good while gaming.

The build is mostly plastic, with some metal reinforcement on the display lid. It weighs in at about 5.84 pounds (2.65 kg). Inside, there’s 16GB of DDR5-5600 RAM and a 1TB PCIe Gen 4 SSD. There’s an extra NVMe slot for expansion. One thing that stood out to me was the ease of access for upgrading memory and storage—no screws are needed to get inside. A simple twist-and-lift mechanism opens the bottom panel to expose the internals.

As for the lighting, it’s a bit of a mixed bag. The system features a full underglow RGB light bar and zone-based keyboard lighting, but the customization process is far from intuitive. You’ll need to dig into ASUS’s Armory Crate and Aura Sync software to isolate the keyboard from the light bar, and it doesn’t support per-key lighting. It’s clunky.

The keyboard itself feels solid, with a good amount of travel and a few translucent keycaps that let the lighting through. The trackpad is generously sized and responsive.

Port selection is another strong point: the left side includes the power input, gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, a 10Gbps USB-A port, a Thunderbolt 4 port, and a 10Gbps USB-C port that also supports video output. On the right, there are two more 10Gbps USB-A ports. The power brick is 280W—not small, but a bit more manageable than others in this class.

I like Thunderbolt ports because they add a lot of versatility to a laptop, especially for someone like me who does live video production. With Thunderbolt, I can connect high-speed external storage, additional displays, or even specialized gear like desktop capture cards in compact breakout boxes (compensated affiliate link). I set my local high school up with a Blackmagic card in a Thunderbolt box that brought in four SDI camera feeds for live switching—something that wouldn’t be possible with a standard USB-C port. It’s one of those features that quietly makes a gaming laptop far more capable for both creative work and general expansion.

Battery life is about what you’d expect. While gaming, you might get an hour or two. Lighter tasks like browsing and document work could stretch it to six to eight hours, assuming lower brightness and efficiency settings. The 1080p webcam is passable, and there’s also an IR camera for facial recognition login.

In terms of gaming performance, I tested Cyberpunk 2077, No Man’s Sky, and Red Dead Redemption 2, all at the display’s native resolution with graphic settings cranked up and DLSS enabled. Frame rates ranged from about 75 to over 100 fps depending on the title and scene. Even with the modest display resolution, the visuals looked sharp and responsive, and the 165Hz refresh rate kept everything smooth. The display also handles glare well thanks to its anti-reflective coating.

As for benchmarks, the 3DMark Time Spy score came in at 12,960—better than last year’s version of this with an RTX 4060, and not far off from some RTX 4070 laptops. A 99.2% score on the 3DMark stress test suggests strong thermal performance under sustained load. The laptop has three fans and large exhaust vents, and while you’ll hear the fans when gaming, they’re not overly loud. This thicker chassis likely contributes to better airflow and reduced noise.

From a build and performance perspective, the G16 sits in an interesting spot—not quite high-end, but a clear step up from ASUS’s TUF line. It’s sturdy, not overly flashy, and quiet under load. The display looks better than its resolution might suggest, and gaming performance is solid across the board. It’s also a useful option for creators thanks to the inclusion of Thunderbolt 4.

This one checks a lot of boxes for me as someone who games occasionally and does video production. Others might prefer different brands or slightly different features, but this setup hits a nice balance.

Disclosure: Asus provided the laptop on loan. This was not a sponsored review nor was content reviewed or approved prior to publishing. All opinions are my own.

Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14 Review (with Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910)

I got a chance to check out Lenovo’s new Chromebook Plus 14, powered by the MediaTek Kompanio 910 processor. I didn’t have high expectations going in—MediaTek hasn’t exactly been known for high-performance chips in the Chromebook space—but this one surprised me. It handled just about everything I threw at it with the kind of responsiveness I usually associate with Intel or AMD-based machines, and it stayed cool and quiet throughout thanks to its fanless design. You can see it in action in my latest review.

This particular configuration comes with 16GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, priced at $749 (compensated affiliate link). The entry-level version starts at $649, and both perform the same. As part of the Chromebook Plus program, buyers also get a year of Google’s Gemini Pro service included, along with two terabytes of cloud storage across their Google account. After the first year, subscription fees apply.

The 14-inch OLED touchscreen runs at 1920×1200 with a 60Hz refresh rate and maxes out at 400 nits of brightness. It’s sharp and vibrant, with a 16:10 aspect ratio that works well for productivity. The webcam clocks in at 1440p and includes some of those AI background effects Google has built into the Chromebook Plus version of the ChromeOS operating system. It’s not amazing, but it does the job. There’s also a physical privacy shutter.

Build-wise, the Chromebook feels solid with a mostly metal chassis, though there’s a bit of flex in the keyboard deck. The keyboard is standard Lenovo fare—comfortable, backlit, and roomy enough for extended typing sessions, even if the key travel is a little shallow. The audio quality was better than expected, with Dolby Atmos certification and a full, clear sound, especially for a Chromebook.

Ports are minimal: two USB-C ports (one on each side, both full-function but limited to 5Gbps), a USB-A port, and a headphone jack. It supports up to two external displays, though only one port could hit 60Hz, the other 30Hz, when I mixed adapters. Wi-Fi 7 support is on board, and I was able to hit close to gigabit speeds with a compatible access point.

Battery life is a standout. I got more than 13 hours out of it under typical Chromebook workloads, especially when keeping the OLED brightness in check. And since it’s completely silent and solid-state, it’s a very comfortable device to use on the go.

In terms of real-world performance, web browsing felt snappy and responsive. On the Speedometer benchmark, it scored a 25, which lines up with newer Snapdragon-powered Windows devices and outperforms some previous-generation Intel Chromebooks. It also had no trouble playing back 4K 60fps YouTube video.

One limitation to be aware of is streaming video apps. Netflix, for example, doesn’t output HD video through the Android app on Chromebooks due to DRM issues—something that’s been unresolved for years. The workaround is to use the Netflix website instead, where video plays back at full resolution.

This particular Chromebook Plus has two on-device AI features lacking on other Chromebook Plus devices. The first is a browser tab organizer can group tabs into virtual desktops based on topic. It worked, though not perfectly and it sometimes missed obvious groupings. The other feature, an on-device background removal tool for images, is not quite there yet. I tried it on a photo for a YouTube thumbnail and still needed additional edits afterward. Some of the Gemini-based tools integrated into Chrome OS—like article summaries and auto-writing—worked more reliably and were genuinely helpful for quick tasks.

Gaming and emulation performance was better than I expected. Android games like Wuthering Waves ran smoothly on balanced settings. I tried mapping touchscreen controls to a game controller (another Chromebook Plus exclusive feature) and it seemed to work well enough. I also ran the Dolphin emulator and tested out GameCube games. I experienced solid, full speed performance with room to push resolutions higher on some titles.

3DMark’s Wildlife test gave a score of 18,498 on the standard benchmark and 5,284 on the Extreme version. That puts it in the ballpark with many of its peers at this price point.

Linux support is present, as it is with most Chromebooks. I installed the Linux development environment, ran some command-line tools like Nano, and even launched graphical applications like LibreOffice. Everything worked, aside from a few window resizing quirks. It’s a useful feature for anyone interested in development or running more traditional desktop applications.

This Chromebook will be supported with security updates through June 2035, giving it a 10-year lifespan. That’s about as good as it gets on Chrome OS right now.

What stood out most was just how capable the MediaTek chip was. I’ve used a lot of Chromebooks over the years, and this one didn’t feel like it was held back by its processor. I’m curious to see whether MediaTek will be able to bring this same chip to the Windows ecosystem. Overall this is a strong showing for Chromebook users looking for a fanless, portable device with long battery life and decent performance across the board.

See more Chromebook reviews here!

Disclaimer: Lenovo provided the Chromebook on loan for this review. They did not review or approve this content before it was uploaded and this is not a sponsored review.

NVME Six Pack: Beelink ME Mini Server / NAS

I recently got a look at a compact mini PC from Beelink called the ME, and what makes it stand out is its ability to hold six NVMe drives internally. This device is built with network-attached storage in mind, and while I’m demoing it here with Unraid, it also supports other NAS operating systems and Linux distributions. It even ships with a licensed copy of Windows if you want to go that route.

You can see it in action in my latest review.

Inside, it runs on an Intel N150 processor—definitely on the lower end—but well-suited for light server tasks and Docker containers. You can find it on Amazon or direct with a few more configuration options on their website directly (compensated affiliate links).

My review unit included a Crucial-branded NVMe drive pre-installed in slot 4. All the bundled storage options appear to use Crucial, which I’ve been using myself for years.

The drives insert vertically and make contact with a heat pad that connects to a large central heatsink. That design does a noticeably better job at keeping drives cool than other compact NAS units I’ve tested recently. The slots themselves are mostly 1x PCIe interfaces, with slot 4 being the faster with a 2x lane slot. Even so, it maxed out around 1.3 GB/s with the Crucial PCIe 4.0 SSD out of that slot. The rest are slower but the bottleneck in most NAS applications will be the network, not the drive speeds.

This unit includes two 2.5Gb Ethernet ports, which gave me around 200–250 MB/s throughput over the network during my tests. It’s unlikely you’ll saturate even the slowest drive slot with this kind of networking. Internally, the device has 12GB of soldered Crucial RAM. That’s not expandable, but for NAS and home server purposes, it’s enough. There’s also an Intel AX101 Wi-Fi 6 card if you’d rather go wireless.

Ports include two USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports (one USB-A, one USB-C), HDMI, USB 2.0, and a power jack—no external power brick here, just a built-in 45W supply. The casing is plastic but feels solid and clean, especially for a device that may sit out in the open. Video output supports 4K60, and I tested it with Ubuntu and Windows 11 Pro, both of which ran without issues. The hardware was properly recognized under Linux, and the preinstalled Windows license activated without a problem.

To test Unraid, I simply took the drives out of a GMKtec NAS I had been using and inserted them into this one. Everything came up immediately, including my external USB drive array. The only hiccup came from the USB-C port not playing nicely with my drive array; switching to the USB-A port resolved it, but I did lose my parity drive in the process. That seems more like a controller compatibility issue than a fatal flaw, though it’s something to be aware of.

I’m now considering moving entirely to solid-state storage, especially since this device gives me two more NVMe slots than the GMKtec box did. With Unraid’s parity setup, five slots can be used for storage and one for parity, giving me up to 20TB of usable space if I install 4TB drives across the board. I’ve only got about 9TB of data right now, so it’s feasible. 4TB NVME storage is pretty pricey at the moment so I’ll probably piece it together with smaller drives.

Power consumption is low—about 18–20 watts idle with five NVMe drives installed and a couple of Docker containers running. Under load, like when writing large files or playing back a Plex stream with hardware-accelerated 4K HDR tone mapping, it edged up to around 26-30 watts. Hardware transcoding works just fine in Unraid as long as you remember to add /dev/dri to your container configuration. I detail that in the video.

Temperatures on the drives were impressive. A WD cache drive that previously idled at 69°C in the GMKtec unit now hovers around 50–51°C in this one. Under load, those numbers go up a bit, but they’re still dramatically better than before. It’s a testament to the improved passive cooling inside this unit. The fan is also whisper-quiet—much less noticeable than my spinning external drives.

One downside is thermal throttling under extended CPU load. A 3DMark Time Spy stress test resulted in a fail grade, with performance dropping around 16%. That’s shouldn’t impact most NAS workloads, but I wouldn’t use this for anything that demands sustained CPU performance.

Overall, this mini PC has proven to be a capable, efficient little box for self-hosting in tight spaces. I’ve got some reconfiguring to do now—time to dig through my parts bin and see which higher-capacity NVMe drives I can consolidate onto this unit. It feels like there’s real potential to go all solid-state here and simplify the setup.

Sandisk Creator Phone SSD Review

I’ve been testing out an external SSD from SanDisk that’s designed for smartphones. It’s called the Creator Phone SSD, and it attaches magnetically to the back of your MagSafe compatible phone. If you’re not using an iPhone with MagSafe, there’s a ring included in the box to help with the mounting. The drive connects via USB-C, so it’s compatible with just about any device that has a USB-C port including Android phones.

You can see it in action in my latest review.

Once connected via USB, your phone can record video directly to the drive using apps like Final Cut Camera on iOS or Blackmagic’s Camera App that works on both platforms.

You can find it on Amazon and see the latest prices at this compensated affiliate link.

Physically, there’s not much to it—just a USB port and the magnetic mount point. One limitation is the lack of a pass-through port, which means the phone’s USB-C port is completely occupied when the drive is connected. That rules out charging your phone or connecting something like an external microphone while recording. It’s a tradeoff that could matter for certain workflows.

There is a five-year warranty on the product, which adds some peace of mind for professional users. Out of the box, it’s formatted with the exFAT file system, which works across most devices—iPhones, iPads, Windows, Macs, and Linux systems. Some older Android phones might not mount the drive properly due to lack of exFAT support, but reformatting to FAT32 can help with compatibility in those cases.

One frustration I had was with the bundled app, SanDisk Memory Zone. If installed, it auto-launches every time the drive is plugged in. It’s useful for things like photo and contact backups, but it also tends to interfere with other apps, particularly Final Cut Camera. Even worse, if you don’t install it, your iPhone will keep prompting you to do so. The only workaround I found was to install the app and then uninstall it, which stops the prompts and lets other video apps access the drive properly.

Once I removed the app, Final Cut Camera immediately recognized the drive, and I was able to record without issues. Using HEVC compression, the 1TB drive can store a lot—up to 18 hours of 4K 120 fps footage, or 36 hours at 60 fps. With ProRes, that drops to about 1 hour and 9 minutes at 4K 60 fps, which is still respectable for the format.

SanDisk seems to have done a good job managing the drive’s power draw, which is important for iPhones. The iPhone will cut off power if a connected accessory pulls more than 4.5 watts, and I didn’t encounter that problem during extended testing at 4K 60 fps or 120 fps.

But in order to manage power draw, the drive will throttle its write performance. While I was able to achieve 4k 60 fps ProRes recordings without any dropped frames, I did have some frame drops shooting 120 fps with the ProRes codec. I did not have issues with fast frame rates at 120fps, however.

I ran the Blackmagic Disk Speed Test on my MacBook Air to get a sense of the drive’s performance. It clocked write speeds around 917 MB/s and read speeds near 881 MB/s. Those are solid numbers, but I did notice some variation in earlier tests, with write speeds occasionally dipping to around 400–500 MB/s. Apple says ProRes 4k 120 needs a minimum of 440 megabytes per second in sustained write speeds.

For users who need consistent, reliable performance at 4K 60 fps using ProRes, I think this drive holds up. It didn’t overdraw power, and I didn’t see dropped frames during long recordings. I’d like to see a future version of this drive with pass-through power and maybe a USB hub for audio gear, and it would be a big improvement if the software didn’t interfere so much. Still, the hardware itself seems reliable, and that counts for a lot if you’re shooting professionally with a phone.

Disclosure: Sandisk sent the drive to the channel free of charge. However no other compensation was received and they did not review or approve this post or my video prior to publication.

8BitDo Controller Compatibility with the Switch 2!

I noted last week that I was able to pick up a Nintendo Switch 2 on launch day, and one of the first things I wanted to check out was how well 8BitDo controllers work with it. If you’re not familiar with 8BitDo, they make a mix of retro-styled and modern wireless controllers that have been popular with Switch owners for years. They are excellent budget replacements for the first party Switch Pro controller that cost substantially less.

When the Switch 2 launched, their controllers didn’t work right out of the box, but 8BitDo recently pushed down some firmware updates that bring compatibility to some of their newer controllers. In my latest video, I take a look at a few and see how they perform.

8BitDo recently posted an update on their X account detailing which of their controllers now support the Switch 2 via firmware updates. Some older models are still out of luck, but a good number of the more recent ones—including newer versions of the SN30 Pro, their translucent editions with Hall effect sticks, and others—can now connect and work properly once updated.

I took a handful of these controllers, installed the latest firmware, and tested them with Super Mario Odyssey to see how they held up with basic controls, motion input, and rumble feedback.

The update process itself was a little bumpy. The SN30 Pro uses a different tool than the Ultimate and 2C controllers, and I ran into some hiccups—especially with the Ultimate 2C controller not connecting properly on macOS. Switching to Windows solved the issue, and once I got the firmware installed on all three, it was time to test them out.

Pairing the SN30 Pro was straightforward. After holding down Y and Start to enter Switch mode, the console recognized it as a Pro Controller. In Mario Odyssey, the buttons, analog sticks, and motion controls worked as expected. The same held true for the 2C and Ultimate controllers—everything was responsive and mapped correctly, including motion gestures like flicking Mario’s cap.

One thing I did have to tweak was the vibration setting. It was off by default, and none of the controllers rumbled until I went into the system settings and turned vibration back on. Once enabled, rumble worked normally, although it’s the standard type—not the HD Rumble you’d get from Nintendo’s Joy-Cons.

I also tested input latency using a 240fps camera to measure button response time. All three controllers, when connected via Bluetooth, performed identically to the Joy-Cons in terms of latency.

At the moment, Switch 2 compatibility is limited to specific 8BitDo models, as outlined in their recent post. Support for older controllers isn’t here yet, but they’ve indicated that more updates are on the way. For now, if you have one of their newer models and install the latest firmware, you should be in good shape.

Disclosure: 8BitDo and their distributor AKNES sent the controllers to the channel free of charge. No other compensation was received and they did not review or approve this post or my video before publication.

The Switch 2 Launch Was Nintendo’s Most Successful and Most Boring..

I picked up a Switch 2 (compensated affiliate link) the other day—not because I had planned on it, but because I noticed GameStop had them in stock, so I grabbed one. I’ve been playing with it since, but what really stood out to me wasn’t the console itself—it was the nature of the launch. This might be the most low-key console release I’ve ever seen. My kids, who are big Nintendo fans, didn’t even know it was happening. None of their friends were talking about it either. It felt like the Switch 2 just kind of… appeared. And I think that was by design.

See more in my latest video.

That said, the launch was a success for the Big N. They manufactured enough inventory to get units into the hands of most early adopters who wanted one. Nintendo says it’s their most successful console launch to date, selling 3.5 million units in its first four days on the market. Scalpers are not making much money this cycle as a result.

The Switch 2 feels like a slightly better version of the original Switch. It feels faster while navigating the interface and it now has 4K output when docked, though most games won’t take advantage of that. The handheld now sports a larger and higher resolution 1080p screen at 120Hz with variable refresh rate.

There are some tweaks to the hardware: it now features magnetic Joy-Con attachments that attach securely (but prevent the use of non-drifting hall effect sticks), dual USB-C ports, and a sturdier kickstand. Docking works smoothly, and the whole thing feels very familiar to the original Switch. That seems intentional. Nintendo didn’t want to reinvent the wheel—they just wanted to refine it. The result is a console that’s very recognizably a Switch, just with some extra capabilities and polish.

Backward compatibility has been seamless in my experience. Some older games even seem to run a little better. Nintendo is also offering paid upgrades for certain titles—I spent $10 to upgrade my copy of Zelda Tears of the Kingdom, for instance.

As for new games, there’s not much to talk about. Mario Kart World is the marquee launch title along with Fast Fusion, a sequel to an F-Zero style racing game that launched on the first Switch. There’s three remakes/remasters of older games exclusive to the Switch 2: Survival Kids, and Bravely Default HD, Yakuza 0 Director’s Cut. Aside from that, there’s Nintendo Welcome Tour, which is more of a tutorial than a game. The rest of the lineup are bunch of ports of games that have been out for awhile on other systems including Cyberpunk 2077 and No Man’s Sky.

Price-wise, it’s not cheap. $449 for the console and dock, or $499 if you want the Mario Kart World bundle (which comes as a digital download). Nintendo has also introduced a new kind of cartridge—digital key cards that don’t contain the game but rather a code to download it embedded on the chip. On the plus side, these can be resold unlike non-physical digital titles. On the downside, they rely on Nintendo’s servers, which raises questions about long-term access.

Battery life is about on par with the original Switch: two hours or so when running demanding titles like Mario Kart, and a bit more for lighter games.

What stood out to me most about this launch was how quiet it was. Nintendo made a deliberate choice to ease into this. After all, they’ve been here before. The Wii sold over 100 million units, but its successor, the Wii U, sold only 13.5 million. That was a hard lesson in how quickly things can go south when the mainstream consumer base gets confused or alienated. The Switch reversed that trend and became a runaway success. Now, Nintendo’s being cautious, and I can’t blame them.

What I think we’re seeing here is the continued commoditization of video game hardware. Consoles no longer have unique, defining traits. The PlayStation and Xbox are essentially the same inside—PCs in console shells. Microsoft isn’t even making its own handheld—it’s letting ASUS handle that with a Windows-based Xbox-branded device. Nintendo’s sticking to ARM architecture with Nvidia chips, but even that feels like a holdout against an inevitable shift.

It’s starting to feel like we’re heading into a hardware-agnostic future. Where you play might soon matter less than what you play, and the idea of console exclusivity might not hold much weight when the hardware differences vanish. That raises some big questions for Nintendo. Do they eventually pivot fully into software? They resisted that move before, but as more consumers expect access across devices, the pressure might mount again.

For now, the Switch 2 is what it looks like: a slightly nicer Switch. And that might be enough to get through the rest of this decade and into the next.

GTBox G-Dock Review – Oculink/USB 4/Thunderbolt eGPU Enclosure with Built-in Power Supply

I’ve been experimenting lately with external GPUs on the channel, especially now that Oculink ports are showing up in more mini PCs. One of my ongoing frustrations, though, is that a lot of the budget Oculink gear looks like a science fair project when you set it up—there’s power supplies and cables all over the place.

The other day a company called GTBox reached out and sent over their G-Dock, which aims to clean things up a bit. You can see it in action in my latest video review.

The G-Dock integrates an 800 watt power supply, which not only makes things neater but also more convenient. What’s nice about the G-Dock is that it’s more versatile than most setups I’ve tried. It supports both Oculink and Thunderbolt/USB 4 connections, and the USB/Thunderbolt port also provides power delivery, so it can charge a laptop with up to 100 watts while providing external GPU support all through one connection. You don’t get a traditional enclosure with this—your card mounts on top, exposed—but it does make for a more compact and affordable option.

The unit sells for $249 on GTBox’s site (compensated affiliate link), and they provided a coupon code—LON10—for an extra $10 off. It’s also on Amazon. Just keep in mind, if you’re connecting over USB 4, you’ll need a full 40 Gbps port for it to work. A lot of USB-C ports look the same, but older USB 3.2 ports won’t cut it. Oculink, on the other hand, requires your PC to have an Oculink port or an adapter that adds it. Some mini PCs have them built in now, and I’ve tested some of those here in the past.

For the G-Dock test, I hooked up a 4060 GPU to the dock and connected it to a MinisForum mini PC using the included Oculink cable. It’s important to note that Oculink isn’t hot-swappable, so you need to boot the system with the connection already in place. I also made sure to connect my HDMI cable directly to the GPU rather than the mini PC for best performance—routing through the system’s onboard video usually results in lower performance.

The G-Dock powered up just fine. The GPU’s fan spun up, Windows detected the card, and after installing the latest NVIDIA drivers, I fired up Cyberpunk at 1080p with medium settings which ran great. The mini PC featured in this video has strong CPU performance but weak integrated graphics, so the external GPU really gave it a boost.

Next, I tried it with a laptop over Thunderbolt. Everything worked as expected, though there was a small performance dip compared to the Oculink connection. I also made sure to disable the laptop’s internal display and run everything through the external monitor connected to the GPU, which helps avoid further performance losses.

Overall, the G-Dock felt solid. The fan noise was minimal, and the integrated power made it a lot less cluttered than the other Oculink setups I’ve worked with. Still, I’d like to see companies revisit the more protective enclosures we see in the Thunderbolt world—something that completely houses the card and power supply for better durability and aesthetics. But all in this is one of the better Oculink solutions I’ve used.

Disclosure: GTBox sent the eGPU enclosure to the channel free of charge. I purchased the 4060 GPU with my own funds. No other compensation was received and no one reviewed or approved this post or video before it was uploaded.

Unifi U7 Lite Review: $99 Wi-Fi 7 Access Point Breaks the Gigabit Barrier

I’ve been gradually upgrading the Wi-Fi setup in my house, and the latest step in that process is beginning to swap out my UniFi Wi-Fi 6 access points for the new Wi-Fi 7 models. This first step was installing the new U7 Lite, their entry-level Wi-Fi 7 device priced at $99 (compensated affiliate link).

You can see it in action in my latest video.

I started with the one in my studio since this is where I’ll likely have the most Wi-Fi 7 clients to experiment with. It’s a good test case for seeing how much of a real-world bump I can get from upgrading to Wi-Fi 7.

Physically, the U7 Lite is nearly identical to previous “Lite” models from UniFi. It uses the same mounting bracket as the AC Lite and U6 Lite, which made installation a 30-second job—twist out the old one, twist in the new one, and that was it. It requires PoE (Power over Ethernet), and I’m powering it through the UniFi Flex 2.5 PoE switch I reviewed recently. The U7 Lite, like the prior model, doesn’t include a PoE injector.

Specs-wise, the U7 Lite is a 2×2 access point for 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz only—it doesn’t include 6 GHz support. For my environment, which is a rural home with minimal RF interference and modest usage, that’s fine. The jump to 2.5 Gbps Ethernet from the 1 Gbps found on older units opens up some potential bandwidth gains, and I was curious to see just how much improvement I’d get on my Wi-Fi 7 devices.

Before upgrading, I ran some benchmarks using an iPhone 16 Pro Max connected to my U6 Lite prior to its decommissioning. Downstream speeds hovered just under 500 Mbps, and upstream was a bit better, close to 600 Mbps. Those were solid numbers for a mid-range access point, and I saw similar results on my Windows PC as well.

Once the U7 Lite was installed and adopted by the UniFi Controller, I didn’t change any settings initially—just let it run with the defaults to see if the upgrade alone made a difference. And it did. Download speeds immediately jumped to around 700 Mbps. Upload stayed in the same ballpark as before, but the increased downstream bandwidth was a good early sign.

Next, I tried enabling a wider channel width. The U7 Lite allows up to 240 MHz, but that depends on client compatibility and has the potential for channel overlap and interference with other access points. I set it to 240 just to see what would happen, and my iPhone connected at 160 MHz—likely its hardware limit. Still, that change alone brought my download speeds right up to a gigabit, with upload seeing an improvement as well.

Then I tested out Multi-Link Operation (MLO), a new feature in Wi-Fi 7 that allows simultaneous connections across multiple frequency bands—in this case, 2.4 and 5 GHz. I created a new SSID and enabled MLO in the UniFi Controller, but the results weren’t impressive. Downloads dropped a bit compared to the single 160 MHz channel, and upload didn’t see much change either. Latency was slightly worse as well, with occasional packet drops during ping tests. For now, MLO seems like a feature that still needs some maturing—both in terms of firmware and client device support.

When I reverted back to the standard 160 MHz Wi-Fi 7 configuration, latency improved and speeds returned to peak levels. I’ll continue to keep an eye on MLO as I bring in new test devices with stronger radios, but it’s not quite ready for prime time in my setup.

The takeaway so far is that Wi-Fi 7, even on an entry-level access point like the U7 Lite, can deliver meaningful performance gains—especially on the downstream side. It’s a simple, affordable upgrade that integrates easily into existing UniFi networks. I’ll likely pick up another, more robust unit for my upstairs area where traffic is heavier and keep testing from there. As always, more to come!

Disclosure: I purchased the U7 Lite myself. The router I’m using, the UniFi Dream Machine Pro, was sent to the channel five years ago, but all opinions are mine and the video was not sponsored or pre-reviewed.

The Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Packs a Lot of Value – Full Review

Lenovo’s Yoga Tab Plus is a large Android tablet that packs a fair amount into a single package. It includes the tablet, keyboard, and pen—all for a price that’s often around $700, sometimes less if there’s a sale. You can find it direct at Lenovo or at Best Buy (compensated affiliate links). Shop around and you may get a good price when it goes on sale.

You can see it in operation in my latest video review.

The tablet comes equipped with a nice 12.7-inch LTPS display. It’s not OLED, but the 3K resolution and 144Hz refresh rate made it look sharp and feel very responsive. It supports Dolby Vision HDR with a peak brightness reaching up to 900 nits. The display was quite visible outdoors even under direct sunlight. Colors are accurate too, with full DCI-P3 coverage.

Performance is solid thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor and 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM. It’s responsive for everyday use, can run Android games well, and even handles emulation up to the PlayStation 2 era reasonably smoothly. There’s 256GB of internal storage, though there’s no SD card slot, which might be a limitation for some. You can expand storage via USB-C, but there’s not much in the way of ports otherwise—just a USB-C and a power button that doubles as a fingerprint reader.

The included keyboard, while not backlit, feels solid—similar to Lenovo’s laptop keyboards with good spacing and travel. It attaches magnetically and folds around the back when not in use. One weak point is the kickstand, which doesn’t sit flush when folded up and feels a bit awkward. Still, the keyboard gives the tablet a laptop-like experience, especially when used with Lenovo’s optional “PC Mode” that lets apps float in windows rather than running full screen.

The included pen introduces something a little different. It offers subtle haptic feedback and a paper-like writing sound that made the experience feel more natural. It also supports pressure sensitivity and charges magnetically on the top of the tablet. The build quality of both the pen and the tablet feels premium, with a metal body and sturdy design.

For media consumption, the tablet supports Widevine L1 DRM, so Netflix and Disney+ stream at the full resolution of the display. Audio is decent with a quad-speaker setup that includes what Lenovo says are subwoofers. There’s not much deep bass, but the sound is balanced and immersive enough, especially in landscape orientation.

The camera system is pretty good especially for conference calls. The front-facing 13MP sensor supports 4K at 30fps and looks better than many laptop webcams I’ve looked at. Around back, there’s a second 13MP camera and a 2MP macro camera. Rear video also records in 4K, but there’s no stabilization, so handheld video can get shaky.

Battery life held up well in testing. Lighter tasks like web browsing and media playback stretched past 11 hours, while more demanding apps will naturally pull that number down. The tablet ships with Android 15 and will get security updates through 2029—less than what Chromebooks or PCs usually get.

There’s also a local AI feature onboard called AI Now. It works completely on device and will analyze attached documents to answer questions. It’s not perfect, but it worked reasonably well in my tests, and it’s entirely self-contained on the device. For more accurate or nuanced answers, you’ll still want to turn to cloud-based tools like ChatGPT or Google Gemini.

All told, the Yoga Tab Plus offers a lot for the price—especially with the pen and keyboard included. It’s not a top-tier device, but for those looking for a larger Android tablet that can handle a bit of everything without breaking the bank, this might be worth a look—particularly if you catch it on sale and don’t mind waiting for the right deal to come along.

Walmart Onn 4k Plus Google TV Streaming Box Review

Walmart just refreshed their sub $30 Google TV device with the new Onn 4K Plus (compensated affilate link). These are designed mainly for situations where a TV’s smart features are outdated or no longer functional, and in that context, it ends up being a surprisingly capable solution that feels a lot more powerful than its predecessor.

You can see it in action in my latest video review.

The device itself is a small puck—slightly larger than the last version—with HDMI out, a USB-C port for power, and a reset button. Performance over Wi-Fi was surprisingly solid. It supports Wi-Fi 6 and pulled around 430 Mbps down and up.

The 4k Plus supports USB-C hubs for peripherals, and I was able to get Ethernet working through one, though compatibility was inconsistent depending on the adapter. It looks as though the port is limited to USB 2.0 speeds as the best I could get out of my adapter was 100 megabits per second.

Internally, this version runs on an Amlogic S905X5M processor with 2GB of RAM and 16GB of storage. That’s a bump up in both performance and storage compared to earlier models. It still won’t satisfy power users, but general performance is responsive, especially when navigating Netflix and other streaming apps. The interface felt much zippier than I expected for this price point.

It runs Android 14 under the hood, and the front-end experience is standard Google TV, which remains very ad-centric. You’re presented with promotions and suggestions based on viewing habits, and it integrates content from services that support Google’s recommendations. The usual suspects like Netflix, Disney+, and YouTube are present, although there are some quirks—Netflix shows can’t be added to the watchlist, for example. That’s a long-standing limitation tied to how Netflix handles integration.

The remote includes voice control, which worked well for searches, and a new “Free TV” button that jumps into Google’s curated free content offering. It’s not vastly different from what Roku or other aggregators do, but Google has added a prominent shortcut to it on the remote to steer users onto their free platform.

Video and audio performance was mixed depending on the app. Netflix ran fine with Dolby Vision and Atmos audio on my 4K setup, but Disney+ didn’t deliver Atmos, and also failed to switch into 24p mode for content that needed it. This isn’t unusual—frame rate switching has been a persistent issue on Android boxes. You can enable it in settings, but results still vary app by app. Netflix behaved the best in my testing.

Gaming was better than expected. Android games ran smoothly, and GeForce Now performed decently over Wi-Fi at 1080p60. There was one crash and reboot, possibly related to the 2GB RAM ceiling, but overall stability was reasonable. Emulation is limited; PlayStation 1 works, but GameCube and PS2 emulators wouldn’t install.

As a Plex client, it handled browsing quickly, which made navigating a large local library feel snappy. But it lacks features more serious users might expect—no support for Dolby Vision from Blu-ray rips or lossless audio passthrough. So while it’s fine for casual Plex use, it’s not going to replace a higher-end setup in a home theater environment.

This box isn’t for enthusiasts, but it’s the kind of product they might still find a use for in a guest room or second TV. For most people, especially anyone looking to upgrade an old smart TV without spending much, it feels like a substantial upgrade. Even if it’s not perfect, it is probably the most value packed TV box on the market.

Unifi Flex 2.5 POE – Power over Ethernet Switch Review

I’ve been running my home network on UniFi gear for over five years now, starting around the time I got a 10 gigabit symmetrical internet connection. I installed a UniFi Dream Machine Pro (compensated affiliate link) and built out a network using their access points and a few switches. Recently, I added a new component to the mix: the Flex 2.5GP PoE switch. That new switch is the subject of my latest video review.

This Flex 2.5 POE is designed more for home prosumers than for rack-mounted enterprise setups. But it will integrate into a business environment just the same. It supports 2.5 gigabit per second speeds across all its Ethernet ports and delivers power over Ethernet (PoE) to connected devices on each. It has an uplink port that supports either an SFP+ or a 10-gigabit RJ45 connection. I opted to uplink it to my 10-gig network backbone using a direct-attached copper SFP+ cable (compensated affiliate link) to my backbone switch.

The switch sells for a reasonable $199 (compensated affiliate link) but has one huge caveat: it doesn’t include a power supply! That cost me another $80 + shipping as I didn’t read the fine print prior to making the initial purchase. The Flex 2.5 POE can use power over ethernet to power itself, but using POE as the input limits the overall power budget—only about 16 watts in my case—while the external power supply gives you up to 196 watts in total with full POE++ wattage for each port on the output. A PoE++ input allows for a 46 watt power budget, and a PoE+++ input allows for 76 watts.

I picked up the Flex 2.5 POE mainly because I’m upgrading to Unifi’s Wi-Fi 7 access points, which now have 2.5 gigabit Ethernet ports. My older UniFi PoE switch only supports gigabit, so this new one gives me faster connectivity and power to those access points. It’s also useful for powering some of my video gear, which relies on PoE.

Hardware-wise, the switch feels solid but lacks the industrial sturdiness of their rack mounted gear. It’s fanless, so it runs quiet but gets a bit warm. It has rubber feet for desktop use and a wall mount option. You can only use one uplink port at a time—either the RJ45 or the SFP+—and only the RJ45 supports PoE in. It is possible to power over the RJ45 while using the SFP+ for data.

Setup was as seamless as usual with UniFi gear. As soon as I connected it, my network detected it, and I was able to adopt it from the web control panel. The firmware updated automatically, and then it was ready to go.

Testing it out, I ran a 2.5 gigabit Ethernet adapter from my PC and confirmed I was getting full speeds on both download and upload. At the same time, I was sending an NDI video stream upstream to my video production system, which added more bandwidth use beyond the 2.5 gigabit baseline. Everything performed as expected.

In the UniFi control panel, I could see real-time power usage across each port. I plugged in four PoE devices and was still using only about 27 watts out of the 196-watt power budget. As this is a managed switch you have full access to all of the configuration options that Unifi offers on their other switches on a per-port level.

What this switch offers is a nearly ideal mix of features for my needs: solid power support, 2.5 gig speeds, and tight integration with the UniFi ecosystem. I would have liked to see at least one more 10 gig port onboard, and it’s frustrating that the power supply wasn’t included. But otherwise, it fills a long-standing gap in UniFi’s product line. For now, it’s found a home in my network closet—and it looks like it’s going to stay there.

The Heltec MeshPocket is an Out of the Box Meshtastic Solution

My latest video takes another look at Meshtastic, this time with a new device called the Heltec MeshPocket that makes the process of getting devices on the off-grid open source mesh communications network much easier.

For those unfamiliar, Meshtastic is a project that lets you build low-cost mesh communication networks using LoRa radios. It’s not huge yet, so Meshtastic networks are often in small pockets in more densely populated areas. But the hardware is cheap enough that you can buy a bunch of nodes for yourself and friends and slowly build out a mesh yourself. If you haven’t already, check out my original Meshtastic video to learn more about how it works.

Heltec, the maker of one of the LoRa boards I’ve used before, sent over a new consumer-ready device—a power bank that also doubles as a Meshtastic node. This one’s interesting because it combines wireless charging (including Qi2 and MagSafe compatibility) with a built-in LoRa radio and an e-ink display for direct messaging visibility. It comes in two capacities—5,000 and 10,000 milliamp hours—and although I’ve been using the smaller version, the larger one is the better value. Still, it lasted me several days running the Meshtastic node continuously, and there was plenty of battery left to charge a phone.

Find one here on Amazon! (compensated affiliate link)

You interact with the node via Bluetooth through the Meshtastic app, and there’s no assembly required. Mine came with previously communicated nodes stored in memory, possibly from Heltec’s testing or perhaps from what the device picked up while in transit. Once powered on, it was immediately ready to join the network. One tip from the manufacturer: don’t use the Meshtastic function while also charging a phone wirelessly—it’s not dangerous, but the radio signal can suffer interference.

The interface is basic but functional. You can scroll through received messages using the “user” button and even send pings without needing the phone. The e-ink display only draws power when it updates, unlike the OLED displays in other nodes, which helps with battery life. So far my MeshPocket has gone a week in between charges when just used for Meshtastic purposes. Firmware updates require a separate magnetic cable, so it’s worth making sure that doesn’t get misplaced.

As for performance, it works about the same as any other node, which is to say pretty well when you’re within range. I tested it by pairing with another DIY node I built and exchanged a few messages over the network. Everything came through reliably and I was able to reach my home node walking around the neighborhood with the MeshPocket.

There’s no GPS or Wi-Fi on this particular Heltec unit, so it’s designed to work entirely via Bluetooth pairing with a phone. But if you wanted to go all in, you could pick up a few cheap radios, build out your own network, and have an independent messaging system that doesn’t rely on cell towers or subscription fees.

In the second part of my video, I demoed what it looks like when your Meshtastic node is around other Meshtastic users. I brought a node along on a recent trip to NYC and left it running on the train and later in a window. After a while, it found another node and pulled in a bunch more from its local list, populating my app with what looked like a pretty well-developed network. I didn’t get much back from most of the nodes—just one automated acknowledgment—but it did confirm that I was reaching something.

The visit made it clear that while the network is still sparse in some areas, the concept works. And with enough nodes—especially ones placed high up with solar power—it could become a viable off-grid communication option. LoRa uses very little power to transmit, so any kind of terrain or building will block signals – hence the need to have many nodes in many places to fill in the gaps.

I’ll keep carrying this around and see what else I can find around Connecticut. There’s something satisfying about seeing a homegrown, decentralized network start to take shape one node at a time.

Disclosure: Heltec sent this to the channel free of charge. However they did not review or approve this post or my video before it was uploaded. All opinions are my own.

Brother HL-L8360CDW Color Laser Printer Review

I finally had to retire my old black-and-white Lexmark laser printer. It served me well for more than a decade, but it started falling apart recently and spewing toner everywhere. After weighing my options, I picked up the Brother HL-8360CDW, a color laser printer that seemed to check all the boxes for my needs without going overboard. You can see it in action in this review video.

My daily printing habits are mostly black-and-white pages—quick reference docs for my Youtube videos, kids reports and other light printing tasks. I don’t print in color often, but when I do, it’s nice to have the option without dealing with the constant clogging issues of an inkjet. That’s been a persistent problem with the inkjet I have sitting nearby, which I use just a couple times a month. Every time I turn it on, it’s a battle with dried ink. A color laser printer like this one solves that for me—no fuss, no wasted ink, and it spins up reliably after sitting idle even for long periods of time.

I paid $449 for the printer over at B&H (affiliate link). The high-yield black toner cartridge costs about $87 and is rated for 4,500 pages. Color toner comes in a three-pack for around $229, yielding about 1,800 pages combined. These numbers are based on standard text coverage, and like any printer, more toner-heavy jobs will burn through supplies faster. Still, I appreciate that Brother offers both standard and high-yield options so I can tailor the setup to how I print.

Even though I don’t do much printing, I wanted something a little more capable than an entry level printer. This model includes a manual feeder that holds 50 pages and can handle envelopes or index cards. There’s a 250-sheet tray at the bottom, and you can expand the capacity with additional trays if needed. My wife prints a lot for PTO work, so having that flexibility helps.

Size-wise, it’s what you’d expect from a laser printer: 47.9 pounds, and bigger than an inkjet, but manageable with good built-in handles. The resolution is 2400 x 600, which boils down to very sharp, clear text and business graphics. It’s not a multifunction device—no scanning or faxing—just a straightforward printer.

Setup was simple. I connected it to Wi-Fi using the on-device display, and all of our devices—Windows PCs, Macs, Chromebooks, phones—found it without issue. There’s Ethernet and USB connectivity too. I didn’t have to register the printer with Brother or set up any kind of cloud account to get started. That was refreshing. It even came with a CD-ROM—an old-school touch that’s increasingly rare.

On a Mac, print settings are handled through AirPrint, so some options like quality settings aren’t directly adjustable. That said, it defaults to high quality anyway, so I haven’t noticed any degradation on the Mac vs. Windows.

Print speed is rated at 33 pages per minute for both black-and-white and color, not counting the time it takes to process the job. It wakes from sleep a bit slower than my old Lexmark, but once it starts, the output is quick. Double-sided printing works well, and while it makes the usual laser printer noises, it’s not overly loud.

Color output was fine after I adjusted the printer’s calibration through the onboard control panel. Out of the box, some alignment was off—especially with graphics layered over color blocks—but it only took a minute to run the calibration through the printer’s menu. Once aligned, text and business graphics looked clean, and photo quality was serviceable. Not inkjet quality, but good enough for newsletters and handouts.

All of our devices were able to print easily once the printer was on the network. iOS, Android, and Chromebook devices recognized it automatically. It’s also CUPS compatible for Linux users. And if needed, you can print directly from a USB stick—PDFs and image files—without even touching a computer.

You can manage the printer through a web interface by entering its IP address, but honestly, the on-device screen was easier to use.

So far, it’s doing exactly what I wanted: reliable black-and-white printing, occasional color jobs, and no headaches. If it lasts anywhere near as long as my last printer, I’ll consider it a win.

The BlueRetro Connects Modern Controllers to the Nintendo 64

I’ve been revisiting my old Nintendo lately, and this time I took a closer look at a small but powerful accessory that could be a game-changer for retro gaming enthusiasts: the BlueRetro Bluetooth controller adapter. Based on BlueRetro’s open source design, it allows nearly any modern bluetooth-based controller to work with the classic console. But it goes beyond just that basic function.

You can check it out in my latest video.

I’ve been using an Xbox controller with my BlueRetro, and everything mapped pretty well right out of the box. Analog stick movement feels accurate and responsive, and it’s a lot more comfortable than trying to wrangle an aging OEM controller back to life. For parents introducing their kids to the N64, this might also be a friendlier on-ramp.

One of the added benefits is its support for controller pack saves. My original controller pack is non-functional, but the BlueRetro replicates that feature internally. I tested it with Rampage World Tour and a few other games and was able to save and load my progress just fine. It’s not something that’s enabled by default, but once set up through the BlueRetro’s web-based control panel, it works well.

The adapter is powered by the console’s controller ports. You’ll need an additional BlueRetro for each controller port, and it’s worth noting that some older N64 power supplies may not handle four units at once. Many users report no issues but it’s something to keep in mind.

Bluetooth pairing is simple enough, and the adapter supports a wide range of controllers. I had no issues with Xbox, PlayStation, Nintendo Switch Pro, and several from 8BitDo. Nintendo’s N64 controller for the Switch is also reported to work.

Most controller functions are mapped intelligently out of the box, but everything is reconfigurable through a web-based UI hosted at blueretro.io. To access it, you’ll need a Chromium-based browser like Chrome or Brave, and you might have to enable the Web Bluetooth API in browser settings. You can remap buttons, back up controller pack saves, and even set configurations on a per-game basis.

I also tested out some advanced functionality, like emulating a Rumble Pak and switching the device into mouse mode. That came in handy when I loaded up a Japanese-exclusive 64DD disc—Mario Artist Paint Studio—through my SummerCart. I paired the 8BitDo mouse I reviewed the other day with the BlueRetro and was able to draw using the original N64 hardware. That’s something I never thought I’d do on a U.S. console.

Overall, this little device along with my new SummerCart has breathed some new life into my Nintendo 64 setup. It’s not without quirks, especially in the configuration process, but once it’s up and running, it opens up a lot of options that weren’t previously available or affordable.

8bitdo Retro R8 Gaming Mouse Review

8bitdo is primarily known for their retro-styled game controllers, but this mouse is their latest foray into a broader ecosystem of PC peripherals, complimenting their mechanical keyboards.

At first glance, it doesn’t looks like a modern gaming mouse—especially with its NES-inspired design—but once I started using it, I found it had a bit more going on than the nostalgic look might suggest. You can see it in action in my latest review and pick one up on Amazon (compensated affiliate link).

The R8 mouse supports three different connectivity modes: Bluetooth, 2.4GHz via a USB dongle, and direct USB-C. Each of the two wireless methods has trade-offs in performance. Bluetooth is the most power-efficient but comes with a modest polling rate of 125Hz. The included 2.4GHz brings a polling rate of 4,000Hz, and plugging it in directly via USB delivers the maximum 8,000Hz rate. Battery life ranges accordingly—up to 100 hours on Bluetooth, and closer to 20–25 hours when polling at 4000hz on the 2.4ghz dongle.

The mouse uses the PAW3395 optical sensor, a popular choice for gaming mice, and features clicky, mechanical Kailh Sword GM X Micro Switches. The full face of each primary button is clickable, which makes for consistent actuation regardless of finger position. The ambidextrous design includes two round programmable side buttons on both flanks.

8BitDo also includes a compact charging dock, which doubles as a receiver station if you plug the dongle into it and connect the dock to your PC. The dock has a solid, weighted base with a rubberized bottom that keeps it from sliding around.

Customization is handled through 8BitDo’s Ultimate Software, which runs on both macOS and Windows but not Linux. It lets you reassign button functions, record macros, and set multiple profiles—useful for switching between games or work tasks. The software also controls DPI levels (with up to five settings), polling rate, scroll speed, and liftoff distance. The only small complaint I had was with the DPI indicator light on the mouse—it doesn’t stay on long enough to easily confirm your setting without cycling back through them.

When I first took it out of the box, the mouse felt lighter than I expected, almost too light at 77 grams. But after playing a few rounds of Quake II, I started to appreciate that lack of heft. The mouse glides easily, and the quick actuation of the buttons makes it well-suited to fast-paced gameplay. There’s no perceptible lag when wired in at the highest polling rate, and even at lower settings, it feels plenty responsive for most tasks.

All told, the R8 mouse ends up being a solid addition to 8BitDo’s growing lineup of retro-inspired, performance-minded gear. It’s priced competitively—depending on tariffs—and brings more features to the table than its minimalist look might suggest.

For a few dollars more they have an Xbox licensed version that offers transparent green casing and an Xbox style color theme. Oddly it doesn’t work with the Xbox console. It also pairs nicely with the company’s keyboards for those looking to keep their setup aesthetically consistent.

Disclosure: 8bitdo provided the mouse free of charge to the channel. No other compensation was received, nor did they review or approve this article or my video prior to uploading. All opinions are my own.